Normal Variants and Pitfalls in Cardiac PET/CT

Positron emission tomography and/or computed tomography (PET/CT) MPI is a powerful imaging modality for the assessment of cardiovascular diseases. It offers several advantages over single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI including robust attenuation correction and absolute quantification of radiotracer activity. PET MPI has a large evidence base and is the only clinical tool to evaluate coronary microvascular dysfunction. In addition, the clinical use and evidence base for 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-g1ucose (¹⁸F-FDG) cardiac PET imaging for inflammation and metabolism imaging is rising exponentially. In order to gain from the advances of this sophisticated quantitative technique, a high-quality scan is critical. It is important for readers to recognize a poor-quality scan, identify artifacts contributing to the poor image quality, and understand how to correct them prior to reporting the results. In this review, we will discuss some normal variants and pitfalls in cardiac PET/CT radionuclide MPI, myocardial viability, and inflammation imaging.

Clinical Utility of Enhanced Relative Activity Recovery on Systolic Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Lessons from PET

SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion images show greater myocardial intensity and homogeneity in systole than diastole because of greater systolic myocardial thickness, less partial volume loss, and enhanced activity recovery. Consequently, conventional myocardial perfusion images obtained from whole cardiac cycles have lower myocardial intensity and greater heterogeneity than systolic images. Considering relative activity distribution on SPECT systolic images may add clinical utility to whole-cycle images and wall motion.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary angiogram within 4 mo after SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging were reviewed. Images were interpreted by 2 masked interpreters using a 17-segment, 5-point scale to determine summed rest scores (SSS), summed stress scores, and summed difference scores on conventional and systolic images in 603 patients (55.6% no coronary artery disease [no-CAD] and 44.4% CAD). Studies were considered normal when the SSS was less than 4 and summed difference score was less than 2.

RESULTS

In the no-CAD group, systolic SSS was lower than SSS from conventional images (2 ± 2.3 vs. 3 ± 2.6, P < 0.001). In contrast, SSS derived from systolic and conventional images were not different in the obstructive CAD group (9.1 ± 7.6 vs. 9.2 ± 7.4, P = 0.559). When systolic images were considered, true-negative studies increased from 27.2% to 43.3% (P < 0.001) whereas false-positive studies decreased from 28.4% to 12.3% (P < 0.001). True-positive (38% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.505) and false-negative studies (6.5% vs. 7%, P = 0.450) were not significantly changed. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 65.2% to 80.8% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, when relative activity distribution on systolic images was considered, false-positive studies were reduced and diagnostic accuracy was improved.