Chest compressions do not disrupt the seal created by the laryngeal mask airway during positive pressure ventilation: a preliminary porcine study

Laryngeal mask ventilation with chest compression during neonatal resuscitation: randomized, non-inferiority trial in lambs

BACKGROUND

Effective positive-pressure ventilation is a critical factor in newborn resuscitation. Neonatal endotracheal intubation (ETT) needs considerable training and experience, which poses a human factor challenge. Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ventilation can be a secure and viable alternative during the initial stages of newborn resuscitation. However, there is limited evidence for its use during chest compression (CC).

METHODS

Seventeen lambs were randomized into LMA or ETT ventilation post cord occlusion induced cardiac arrest. After 5 min of cardiac arrest, resuscitation was initiated as per NRP recommendations. Ventilation, oxygenation, systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic parameters were recorded till the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or 20 min.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The incidence of ROSC was 75% (6/8) in the LMA group and 56% (5/9) in the ETT group (p = 0.74). The median (IQR) time to achieve ROSC was 6.85 min (6 min-9.1 min) in the LMA group and 7.50 min (5.33 min-18 min) in the ETT group (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

LMA ventilation during CC is feasible and non-inferior to ETT in this model.

IMPACT

Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ventilation with chest compression is feasible and non-inferior to endotracheal tube ventilation in this experimental near-term lamb model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. First translational study to evaluate the use of LMA as an airway device with chest compression. Evidence primer for clinical studies to evaluate and confirm the feasibility and efficacy of LMA ventilation with chest compression are necessary before randomized clinical trials in neonates. LMA use in neonatal cardiopulmonary resusciation (CPR) could have the potential to optimize advanced resuscitation, especially in resource-limited healthcare settings.

One-rescuer newborn CPR using a face mask or an i-gel supraglottic airway and two-finger compressions – A manikin study with cross-over desgin

Introduction

When unanticipated neonatal asphyxia occurs, it may be necessary for a single resuscitator to commence advanced resuscitation before others arrive. We hypothesised that a single rescuer can provide positive pressure ventilations and chest compressions using higher inflation pressures and better adherence to the recommended compression rate with an i-gel supraglottic airway than with a face mask.

Method

A manikin-based cross-over study was conducted. Twenty-one midwives performed both positive pressure ventilation using a T-piece and chest compressions with the two-finger technique on a newborn manikin alone. They performed ventilation with a face mask or an i-gel. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was set to 30 cmH₂O. The actual PIPs were evaluated based on the values displayed on the manometer. The total amount of time taken to complete 30 cycles of three compressions and one ventilation was also evaluated.

Results

The mean of the average PIP for each participant was significantly lower with a face mask than with an i-gel (17.3 ± 4.4 vs 28.2 ± 2.0 cmH₂O, p < 0.00001). The amount of time taken to complete 30 cycles was significantly longer with a face mask than with an i-gel (66.2 ± 6.1 vs 60.6 ± 3.4 seconds, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

During one-rescuer newborn resuscitation using a T-piece and the two-finger technique, the PIPs are consistently high and 30 cycles of CPR are better adhered to 60 seconds using an i-gel.