Neural networks for classification of cervical vertebrae maturation: a systematic review

Classification of cervical vertebral maturation stages with machine learning models: leveraging datasets with high inter- and intra-observer agreement

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models with feature selection technique in classifying cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS). Consensus-based datasets were used for models training and evaluation for their model generalization capabilities on unseen datasets.

METHODS

Three clinicians independently rated CVMS on 1380 lateral cephalograms, resulting in the creation of five datasets: two consensus-based datasets (Complete Agreement and Majority Voting), and three datasets based on a single rater's evaluations. Additionally, landmarks annotation of the second to fourth cervical vertebrae and patients' information underwent a feature selection process. These datasets were used to train various ML models and identify the top-performing model for each dataset. These models were subsequently tested on their generalization capabilities.

RESULTS

Features that considered significant in the consensus-based datasets were consistent with a CVMS guideline. The Support Vector Machine model on the Complete Agreement dataset achieved the highest accuracy (77.4%), followed by the Multi-Layer Perceptron model on the Majority Voting dataset (69.6%). Models from individual ratings showed lower accuracies (60.4-67.9%). The consensus-based training models also exhibited lower coefficient of variation (CV), indicating superior generalization capability compared to models from single raters.

CONCLUSION

ML models trained on consensus-based datasets for CVMS classification exhibited the highest accuracy, with significant features consistent with the original CVMS guidelines. These models also showed robust generalization capabilities, underscoring the importance of dataset quality.

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Vertebral Maturation Assessment-A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: To systematically review and summarize the existing scientific evidence on the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in assessing cervical vertebral maturation (CVM). This review aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of AI algorithms in comparison to those of experienced clinicians. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, using a combination of Boolean operators and MeSH terms. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional studies with neural network research, reporting diagnostic accuracy, and involving human subjects. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool was used for bias assessment. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, predominantly employing supervised learning techniques, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The diagnostic accuracy of AI models for CVM assessment varied widely, ranging from 57% to 95%. The factors influencing accuracy included the type of AI model, training data, and study methods. Geographic concentration and variability in the experience of radiograph readers also impacted the results. Conclusions: AI has considerable potential for enhancing the accuracy and reliability of CVM assessments in orthodontics. However, the variability in AI performance and the limited number of high-quality studies suggest the need for further research.

Use of artificial intelligence in determination of bone age of the healthy individuals: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Bone age assessment, as an indicator of biological age, is widely used in orthodontics and pediatric endocrinology. Owing to significant subject variations in the manual method of assessment, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) play a significant role in this aspect. A scoping review was conducted to search the existing literature on the role of AI, ML, and DL in skeletal age or bone age assessment in healthy individuals.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2012 to December 2022 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Grey literature was searched using Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Hand-searching of the articles in all the reputed orthodontic journals and the references of the included articles were also searched for relevant articles for the present scoping review.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. Ten studies used skeletal maturity indicators based on hand and wrist radiographs, two studies used magnetic resonance imaging and seven studies used cervical vertebrae maturity indicators based on lateral cephalograms to assess the skeletal age of the individuals. Most of these studies were published in non-orthodontic medical journals. BoneXpert automated software was the most commonly used software, followed by DL models, and ML models in the studies for assessment of bone age. The automated method was found to be as reliable as the manual method for assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review validated the use of AI, ML, or DL in bone age assessment of individuals. A more uniform distribution of sufficient samples in different stages of maturation, use of three-dimensional inputs such as magnetic resonance imaging, and cone beam computed tomography is required for better training of the models to generalize the outputs for use in the target population.

CURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS DEMONSTRATE POTENTIAL IN AUTOMATED CERVICAL VERTEBRAL MATURATION STAGE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Neural networks for classification of cervical vertebrae maturation: a systematic review. Mathew R, Palatinus S, Padala S, Alshehri A, Awadh W, Bhandi S, Thomas J, Patil S. Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):796-804.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

No financial support was reported.

TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN

Systematic review.

AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has transformed various medical specialties, including orthodontics. AI has shown promising results in enhancing the accuracy of diagnoses, treatment planning, and predicting treatment outcomes. Its usage in orthodontic practices worldwide has increased with the availability of various AI applications and tools. This review explores the principles of AI, its applications in orthodontics, and its implementation in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on AI applications in dental diagnostics, cephalometric evaluation, skeletal age determination, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) evaluation, decision making, and patient telemonitoring. Due to study heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was possible. AI has demonstrated high efficacy in all these areas, but variations in performance and the need for manual supervision suggest caution in clinical settings. The complexity and unpredictability of AI algorithms call for cautious implementation and regular manual validation. Continuous AI learning, proper governance, and addressing privacy and ethical concerns are crucial for successful integration into orthodontic practice.