Value-addition of lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning

Digital versus Manual Tracing in Cephalometric Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Over the years, various researchers have attempted to compare digital cephalometry with the conventional manual approach. There is a need to comprehensively analyze the findings from the earlier studies and determine the potential advantages and limitations of each method. The present systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of digital and manual tracing in cephalometric analysis for the identification of skeletal and dental landmarks. Methods: A systematic search was performed using the keywords "Digital" AND "Manual" AND "Cephalometry" to identify relevant studies published in the English language in the past decade. The electronic data resources consulted for the elaborate search included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ERIC, and ScienceDirect with controlled vocabulary and free text terms. Results: A total of n = 20 studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria within the timeframe of 2013 to 2023. The data extracted from the included articles and corresponding meta-analyses are presented in the text. Conclusions: The findings of the present systematic review and meta-analysis revealed trends suggesting that digital tracing may offer reliable measurements for specific cephalometric parameters efficiently and accurately. Orthodontists must consider the potential benefits of digital cephalometry, including time-saving and user-friendliness.

The use of CBCT in orthodontics with special focus on upper airway analysis in patients with sleep-disordered breathing

Applications of cone-beam CT (CBCT) in orthodontics have been increasingly discussed and evaluated in science and practice over the last two decades. The present work provides a comprehensive summary of current consolidated practice guidelines, cutting-edge innovative applications, and future outlooks about potential use of CBCT in orthodontics with a special focus on upper airway analysis in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. The present scoping review reveals that clinical applications of CBCT in orthodontics are broadly supported by evidence for the diagnosis of dental anomalies, temporomandibular joint disorders, and craniofacial malformations. On the other hand, CBCT imaging for upper airway analysis-including soft tissue diagnosis and airway morphology-needs further validation in order to provide better understanding regarding which diagnostic questions it can be expected to answer. Internationally recognized guidelines for CBCT use in orthodontics are existent, and similar ones should be developed to provide clear indications about the appropriate use of CBCT for upper airway assessment, including a list of specific clinical questions justifying its prescription.

The accuracy of photographic soft-tissue profile analysis to determine Class II and vertical skeletal relationships in children

BACKGROUND

Lateral cephalometric analysis (LCA) is the reference standard for identifying common skeletal relationships in orthodontics, such as Cl II and hyperdivergent skeletal discrepancies, but it entails radiation exposure. Therefore, photographic soft-tissue profile analysis (PSPA) could be a useful alternative for these diagnoses, particularly for paediatric patients. This study aims to estimate the accuracy of PSPA for determining common skeletal discrepancies in children.

METHODS

Cephalometric radiographs and profile photographs of a consecutive series of 100 children (8.0-17.6 years old) made on the same day were included. The validity of PSPA was verified against comparable LCA. First, by assessing the Pearson correlation and then estimating the sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) in sample A (n = 50). After external validation in a new sample B (n = 50), the ROC-AUC, diagnostic odds ratio, best cut-off points and discriminative validity were assessed in the total sample. Interrater reliability was estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the standard error of measurement and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

The measurement properties of the PSPA angles A'N'B', Gl'-Sn-Pog, N'-Sn-Pog', and N'-Tra-Me' were valid (ROC-AUC > 0.7) and reliable (ICCs > 0.92). The angles A'N'B', Gl'-Sn-Pog', and N'-Sn-Pog', with the respective cut-off points ≥7.7', ≥12.8', and ≤163.5', were accurate values for determining Cl II discrepancy. The N'-Tra-Me'-angle (≥63') was an accurate estimate for a hyperdivergent discrepancy.

CONCLUSIONS

These validated PSPA angles could be used in clinical settings as a minimally invasive diagnostic tool to screen children suspected of having skeletal Cl II and hyperdivergent discrepancies.

Teleorthodontics: Where Are We Going? From Skepticism to the Clinical Applications of a New Medical Communication and Management System

Teleorthodontics represents the orthodontic care system involving remote management of orthodontic treatment. Despite skepticism, there are several advantages of including teleorthodontics in the clinical orthodontic practice. In the present review, we discuss the lights and shadows of this new communication healthcare system and its applications in the field of orthodontics that is destined to change the future of our clinical practice. For this purpose, we have provided a point-to-point analysis based on data from the most valuable scientific evidence on this topic. The information and data discussed in the present paper were obtained from the most relevant studies evaluating the performance of teleorthodontics and remote monitoring systems in clinical practice.

Estimation of x-ray radiation related cancers in US dental offices: Is it worth the risk?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to estimate the possible number of cancer cases produced during 2019 in US dental offices from radiography, estimate the possible reduction in those rates resulting from use of intraoral rectangular collimation and selection criteria, and determine the frequency and quality of website radiation risk information and informed consent forms.

STUDY DESIGN

An analysis of dental radiation examinations in 2014 to 2015 US national survey data, Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends, and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements surveys was performed, in addition to an analysis of 2008 to 2020 Journal of Clinical Orthodontics national orthodontic surveys for radiographic examination frequencies. Lifetime attributable cancer risk estimates from US and European studies were used to generate the total dental and orthodontic office cancer totals. In total, 150 offices were examined online for the quality and frequency of risk information in websites and consent forms.

RESULTS

The 2019 estimate for all office cancers is 967. Collimation and selection criteria could reduce this to 237 cancer cases. Most cancers arise from intraoral and cone beam computed tomography examinations, with 135 orthodontic cancers over 21 months (average treatment time). Collimation and selection criteria could reduce this to 68. Only 1% of offices use collimators or informed consent for radiography. The website and consent information were of poor quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Dentists are not following selection criteria or using collimators according to guidelines. Up to 75% of cancer cases could be avoided.