Effect of pharmacological agents on relapse following orthodontic tooth movement

Effect of vitamin D deficiency on postorthodontic relapse: An animal study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the effect of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), retention, and relapse and to assess the effect of systemic administration of vitamin D (VD) in a rat model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 male Wistar rats were divided into two groups, a control group of 11 rats and an experimental group of 21 rats with VDD, after enhancement using a custom diet. Of the VDD group, 11 rats were supplemented with systemic vitamin D3 and categorized as vitamin (VD supplement [VDS]) groups. The VDS group received 40,000 IU/kg via intramuscular injection on Days 1 and 15 of the orthodontic treatment period. A modified orthodontic appliance was fitted to apply 0.5 N of force to move the maxillary right first molars mesially for 14 days, followed by retention and relapse periods for 7 days. Space created during OTM was measured and reassessed after the retention and relapse periods. The relapse ratio was estimated, and histomorphometric analysis was performed to assess the number of osteoblasts, osteoclast bone cells, and bone area.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the relapse ratio and a reduction in osteoblast cells and bone area were observed in the VDD group. By contrast, the amount of tooth movement was significantly higher together with osteoblast cells and bone marrow in VDS with a significant reduction in relapse ratio.

CONCLUSION

VDD was associated with a significant reduction in osteoblast cell count and total bone area in addition to a significant increase in relapse ratio. Routine screening of VD may be beneficial before commencing orthodontic treatment.

Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Enhance Tension-Induced Osteogenesis

Tension-induced osteogenesis has great significance in maintaining bone homeostasis and ensuring the efficiency and stability of orthodontic treatment. Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have shown great potential in regulating bone remodeling. Here, we aimed to explore the effects of periodontal ligament stem cell (PDLSC)-derived EVs on tension-induced osteogenesis and the potential mechanism. PDLSC-derived EVs were extracted by ultracentrifugation. In vitro, PDLSC-derived EVs of 10 μg/mL significantly improved the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells and enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts under a tensile strain of 2000 uε. Next, a mouse model of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) was established and treated with subperiosteal injection of PDLSC-derived EVs (1 mg/kg) on the tension side. The results showed that treatment with PDLSC-derived EVs effectively enhanced OTM and promoted osteogenesis on the tension side, including increasing trabecular bone parameters and promoting the expression of osteogenic-related biomarkers (OCN and OPN). More interestingly, we identified several mechano-sensitive miRNAs enriched in PDLSC-derived EVs by high-throughput miRNA sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that they were related to various osteogenesis-related signaling pathways. Therefore, PDLSC-derived EVs could improve the efficiency of OTM by enhancing tension-induced osteogenesis of osteoblasts. Our study may provide potential evidence for the promoting effects of PDLSC-derived EVs on osteogenesis and offer new insights into the development of treatment strategies for enhancing osteogenesis in orthodontic treatment and other metabolic bone diseases.

The effectiveness of adjuncts or alternatives to the use of orthodontic retainers in preserving posttreatment outcomes: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of adjuncts or alternatives to mechanical retention in preserving postorthodontic treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Electronic databases, unpublished literature, and ongoing trials were searched until July 22, 2022 (PROSPERO CRD42021291165). Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of adjuncts and alternatives to conventional orthodontic retainers were included. Stability, periodontal effects, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes were to be evaluated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) were used for risk of bias assessment. The certainty of the evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Exploratory sensitivity analysis was undertaken to calculate the weighted treatment effects of the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 5128 records were screened. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 5 were randomized controlled trials. Five trials were judged to be at high risk of bias, with 2 studies of unclear risk of bias. Heterogeneity between the limited number of included studies precluded the conduct of meta-analysis. Circumferential supracrestal fibrotomy resulted in less increase in the mandibular Little's Irregularity Index (mean difference, -2.30 mm; 95% confidence interval, -2.86 to -1.74). The overall level of evidence was of very low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuncts and alternatives to mechanical retention have promise, but based on the existing evidence, the reliance on mechanical retention cannot be reduced. There is weak evidence supporting circumferential supracrestal fibrotomy to improve stability outcomes. Further high-quality prospective research focusing on the predictability and acceptability of these approaches is needed.

The rationale for orthodontic retention: piecing together the jigsaw

Retaining teeth in their corrected positions following orthodontic treatment is one of the most challenging aspects of orthodontic practice. Despite much research, the rationale for retention is not entirely clear. Teeth tend to revert to their pre-treatment positions due to periodontal and gingival, soft tissue, occlusal and growth factors. Changes may also follow normal dentofacial ageing and are unpredictable with great variability. In this overview, each of these factors are discussed with their implications for retention, along with adjunctive procedures to minimise relapse. The state of current knowledge, methods used to assess relapse, factors regarded as predictive of or associated with stability as well as overcorrection are outlined. Potential areas requiring further investigation are suggested. The way in which the clinician may manage current retention practice, with a need for individualised retention plans and selective retainer wear, is also considered.

Orthodontic retention: what's on the horizon?

Orthodontic retention remains one of the great challenges in orthodontics. In this article, we discuss what is on the horizon to help address this challenge, including biological approaches to reduce relapse, treating patients without using retainers, technological developments, personalised medicine and the impact of COVID-19 on approaches to orthodontic retention.