Short tandem repeat typing of cells transferred via micromanipulation with whole-genome amplification

New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis

Modern PCR-based analytical techniques have reached sensitivity levels that allow for obtaining complete forensic DNA profiles from even tiny traces containing genomic DNA amounts as small as 125 pg. Yet these techniques have reached their limits when it comes to the analysis of traces such as fingerprints or single cells. One suggestion to overcome these limits has been the usage of whole genome amplification (WGA) methods. These methods aim at increasing the copy number of genomic DNA and by this means generate more template DNA for subsequent analyses. Their application in forensic contexts has so far remained mostly an academic exercise, and results have not shown significant improvements and even have raised additional analytical problems. Until very recently, based on these disappointments, the forensic application of WGA seems to have largely been abandoned. In the meantime, however, novel improved methods are pointing towards a perspective for WGA in specific forensic applications. This review article tries to summarize current knowledge about WGA in forensics and suggests the forensic analysis of single-donor bioparticles and of single cells as promising applications.

Effectiveness of whole genome amplification prior to short tandem repeat analysis for degraded DNA

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is prone to failure as DNA is frequently damaged by various environmental factors; hence, increasing the number of starting templates may constitute a feasible approach to improve STR profiling success. Whole genome amplification (WGA) is often applied to bolster starting template quantity. Moreover, WGA can reportedly be used on degraded DNA samples in forensics. Therefore, we utilized a PCR-based WGA method, termed "modified improved primer extension preamplification" (mIPEP), prior to STR analysis of degraded DNA, as this method is less affected by DNA quantity and quality than most others. Saliva from four volunteers was dried on glass fiber filter papers (paper) and glass slides (glass) and irradiated with UVA light (365 nm). The mIPEP method was initiated using 5, 0.5, and 0.05 ng of DNA following DNA extraction. The DNA degradation index (DI) was calculated based on the ratio of 129 to 41 bp DNA fragments; lower numbers indicate higher degradation. Following mIPEP, STR analysis was performed using the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kit. The number of detectable STR loci, with and without mIPEP, decreased according to reduced DI in a different manner for the various DNA concentrations extracted from paper and glass. Specifically, for the 5 ng DNA sample on paper, at a DI < 0.2, the number of detectable STR loci was greater with mIPEP than without it, owing to fewer locus drop-outs. Similarly, the 0.05 ng DNA sample deposited on paper, at DI ≥ 0.7, exhibited higher numbers of detectable STR loci when prepared using mIPEP owing to fewer allele drop-outs. Moreover, among samples deposited on glass, the 0.05 ng DNA sample at DI ≥ 0.4 afforded a larger number of detectable STR loci when prepared using mIPEP than those without mIPEP, owing to fewer locus drop-outs. These findings suggest that performing mIPEP in accordance with sample DNA condition (e.g., quantity and quality) may lead to increased success of STR analysis. Notably, the conditions identified as most responsive to mIPEP were consistent across both UVA-irradiated and environmentally-damaged sample states. Taken together, our results suggest that applying mIPEP would be beneficial to obtain improved STR profiles under conditions involving severely degraded samples with large quantities of DNA, or with small quantities of DNA albeit with slight degradation.