Operative Intervention Does Not Change Pain Perception in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test

Objective

To construct a self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients, and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods

Through literature reading and interviews with 30 patients, a pool of scale items was formed. The items were classified and sorted out according to the expected scale structure framework. After two rounds of expert consultation and a small range of test dressing, the initial scale was formed. Through the investigation of 85 patients with diabetic foot, item differentiation analysis, correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to screen the items. Cronbach's α coefficient, retest reliability and content and structure validity analysis were used to determine the feasibility and validity of the scale.

Results

The final scale included 4 first-level items and 22 second-level items. The critical ratio method showed that the scores of each item in the high group and the low group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between each item and the total score was 0.431 to 0.829; The content validity index of the scale was 0.91, the exploratory factor analysis identified three common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 75.381%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.934 and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.926.

Conclusion

The self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients has good reliability and validity, and can be used to investigate the health status of diabetic foot patients and evaluate the therapeutic effect.

Implementation of PROMIS® in an Optometry Clinic

PURPOSE

The full utility of general health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) surveys in the eye care setting has not been previously demonstrated. This report demonstrates the feasibility of implementing PROMIS in an eye care clinic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over 2 months, general health and functioning PROMIS surveys were offered to all patients in an optometric clinic in Rochester, NY. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded along with percent completion and time to completion of the survey.

RESULTS

Across 651 patients, 258 chose to attempt PROMIS. Patients with low visual acuity were less likely to attempt the survey (p=0.049), and younger patients were more likely to complete the survey (p=0.025); no other patient characteristics were found to differ between those who did and did not participate in, nor complete, PROMIS. A total of 193 patients completed the survey (74.8%) in a mean time of 6.36 minutes (range = [1.43, 51.92] minutes; standard deviation = 5.62 minutes). Time to completion did not vary significantly across any groups.

CONCLUSION

Our relatively high completion rate among those who attempted PROMIS indicates that PROMIS surveys are feasible to implement in an optometry clinic. While most patients completed the survey in little time, the large range of time to completion may indicate that some patients had difficulty completing the survey. Furthermore, the significant difference in visual acuity between those who participated in the survey and those who did not highlights the need to address the way PROMIS is delivered in order to foster greater inclusion.

Chopart Amputation: Questioning the Clinical Efficacy of a Long-standing Surgical Option for Diabetic Foot Infection

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers with associated infection and osteomyelitis often lead to partial or complete limb loss. Determination of the appropriate level for amputation based on the patient's baseline physical function, extent of infection, vascular patency, and comorbidities can be challenging. Although Chopart amputation preserves greater limb length than more proximal alternatives such as Syme or below-the-knee amputations (BKA), challenges with wound healing and prosthesis fitting have been reported. We aimed to investigate the functional and clinical outcomes of Chopart amputation combined with tendon transfers.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent Chopart amputations for diabetic foot infections by an academic orthopaedic group between August 2013 and September 2018. Subjects completed three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) instruments. Incidence of postoperative complications and change in patient-reported outcomes before and after surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with an average age of 60.8 (range, 44 to 79) years were identified. The mean follow-up was 22.8 months (range, 6.7 to 51.0). Seventeen of the 18 total patients developed postoperative wound complications. These lead to revision amputations in 10 Chopart amputees, consisting of two Syme and eight BKAs. Half of the Chopart patients never received a prosthesis because of delayed wound healing and revision amputation. PROMIS physical function (PF) (31.1 pre-op and 28.6 post-op), pain interference (63.1 pre-op and 59.4 post-op), and depression (53.0 pre-op and 54.8 post-op) did not show significant change (P-values = 0.38, 0.29, 0.72, respectively). Pre- and post-op the PROMIS physical function scores were well below the US average.

DISCUSSION

In our patient cohort, 94% of patients developed postoperative wound complication. Only 44% of patients ever successfully ambulated with a prosthesis after Chopart amputation, and the others (56%) required revision amputations such as a BKA. Even after wound healing, Chopart amputees may struggle with obtaining a prosthesis suitable for ambulation. Surgeons should exercise judicious patient selection before performing Chopart amputation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case Series.