1
|
Considine EG, Sherr JL. Real-World Evidence of Automated Insulin Delivery System Use. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:53-65. [PMID: 38377315 PMCID: PMC10890954 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Objective: Pivotal trials of automated insulin delivery (AID) closed-loop systems have demonstrated a consistent picture of glycemic benefit, supporting approval of multiple systems by the Food and Drug Administration or Conformité Européenne mark receipt. To assess how pivotal trial findings translate to commercial AID use, a systematic review of retrospective real-world studies was conducted. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published after 2018 with more than five nonpregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Data were screened/extracted in duplicate for sample size, AID system, glycemic outcomes, and time in automation. Results: Of 80 studies identified, 20 met inclusion criteria representing 171,209 individuals. Time in target range 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) was the primary outcome in 65% of studies, with the majority of reports (71%) demonstrating a >10% change with AID use. Change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was reported in nine studies (range 0.1%-0.9%), whereas four reported changes in glucose management indicator (GMI) with a 0.1%-0.4% reduction noted. A decrease in HbA1c or GMI of >0.2% was achieved in two-thirds of the studies describing change in HbA1c and 80% of articles where GMI was described. Time below range <70 mg/dL (<3.9 mmol/L) was reported in 16 studies, with all but 1 study showing stable or reduced levels. Most systems had >90% time in automation. Conclusion: With larger and more diverse populations, and follow-up periods of longer duration (∼9 months vs. 3-6 months for pivotal trials), real-world retrospective analyses confirm pivotal trial findings. Given the glycemic benefits demonstrated, AID is rapidly becoming the standard of care for all people living with T1D. Individuals should be informed of these systems and differences between them, have access to and coverage for these technologies, and receive support as they integrate this mode of insulin delivery into their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer L. Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yafi M, Shah A, Velez K. Narrative review of the role of technology in pediatric diabetes: from testing blood glucose to subcutaneous automated therapy and hope for cure. Transl Pediatr 2023; 12:1725-1734. [PMID: 37814709 PMCID: PMC10560351 DOI: 10.21037/tp-23-145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective Type 1 diabetes, the most common cause of diabetes in pediatrics, is defined by the hyperglycemia that results from the permanent autoimmune damage to the pancreas. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that strict glycemic control targeting lower HbA1c goals can both delay the onset and progression of its complications that include diabetic neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, and increased cardiovascular events. Our primary objective is to review the literature available regarding the technology applied for the treatment of diabetes, not only aiding patients' quality of life but addressing its effects on hypoglycemia and reduced risk of the long-term complications. It will synthesize the evolution of glucose monitoring devices; the development of insulin: from animal to recombinant engineering, smart insulin in the future; the development of algorithm-driven insulin delivery devices, the closed loop system/artificial pancreas; and the future utilization of technology to support islet cell transplant with the goal of a long-term cure. Emphasis will be made on what is known about the impact on its outcomes in children and adolescents. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed for publications from 1985 to present. Keywords used: type 1 diabetes, children, adolescents, pediatrics, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pumps. Referenced articles include other reviews, current care guidelines as supported by cross sectional studies, cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. Key Content and Findings Understanding the pathophysiology of type 1 diabetes has led to the design of technology that facilitates glucose monitoring and insulin administration in a personalized manner. The current technology has improved outcomes and quality of life by decreasing hypoglycemic events and decreasing risk of long-term metabolic complications. Barriers remain, for children and adults, often driven by patient's preference as well as their understanding of the limitations of what they are wearing. Conclusions With the progressive evolution of this technology, it is now realistic to lower the burden of diabetes self-management while reducing hypoglycemia and risk of complications that otherwise impact daily life from academics, physical activity, career choices and even life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yafi
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at the University Texas Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Avni Shah
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at the University Texas Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine Velez
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at the University Texas Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardona-Hernandez R, Dôvc K, Biester T, Ekhlaspour L, Macedoni M, Tauschmann M, Mameli C. New therapies towards a better glycemic control in youths with type 1 diabetes. Pharmacol Res 2023; 195:106882. [PMID: 37543096 PMCID: PMC11073821 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most frequent form of diabetes in pediatric age, affecting more than 1.5 million people younger than age 20 years worldwide. Early and intensive control of diabetes provides continued protection against both microvascular and macrovascular complications, enhances growth, and ensures normal pubertal development. In the absence of definitive reversal therapy for this disease, achieving and maintaining the recommended glycemic targets is crucial. In the last 30 years, enormous progress has been made using technology to better treat T1D. In spite of this progress, the majority of children, adolescents and young adults do not reach the recommended targets for glycemic control and assume a considerable burden each day. The development of promising new therapeutic advances, such as more physiologic insulin analogues, pioneering diabetes technology including continuous glucose monitoring and closed loop systems as well as new adjuvant drugs, anticipate a new paradigm in T1D management over the next few years. This review presents insights into current management of T1D in youths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Klemen Dôvc
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology. University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Martin Tauschmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Chiara Mameli
- Department of Pediatrics, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Messer LH, Vigers T, Akturk HK, Forlenza GP, Huss KB, Karami AJ, Malecha E, Oser SM, Polsky S, Pyle L, Shah VN, Wadwa RP, Oser TK. Increasing Use of Diabetes Devices: What Do Health Care Professionals Need? Clin Diabetes 2023; 41:386-398. [PMID: 37456091 PMCID: PMC10338282 DOI: 10.2337/cd22-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
Despite evidence of improved diabetes outcomes with diabetes technology such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, insulin pumps, and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems, these devices are underutilized in clinical practice for the management of insulin-requiring diabetes. This low uptake may be the result of health care providers' (HCPs') lack of confidence or time to prescribe and manage devices for people with diabetes. We administered a survey to HCPs in primary care, pediatric endocrinology, and adult endocrinology practices in the United States. Responding HCPs expressed a need for device-related insurance coverage tools and online data platforms with integration to electronic health record systems to improve diabetes technology uptake in these practice settings across the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel H. Messer
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Tim Vigers
- University of Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, CO
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Aurora, CO
| | - Halis K. Akturk
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Kelsey B. Huss
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Angela J. Karami
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Emily Malecha
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Sean M. Oser
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Sarit Polsky
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Laura Pyle
- University of Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, CO
| | - Viral N. Shah
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Tamara K. Oser
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karol AB, O'Malley G, Fallurin R, Levy CJ. Automated Insulin Delivery Systems as a Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review. Endocr Pract 2023; 29:214-220. [PMID: 36241017 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Approximately 6.3% of the worldwide population has type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the number of people requiring insulin is increasing. Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems integrate continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring with a predictive control algorithm to provide more physiologic glycemic control. Personalized glycemic targets are recommended in T2DM owing to the heterogeneity of the disease. Based on the success of hybrid closed-loop systems in improving glycemic control and safety in type 1 diabetes mellitus, there has been further interest in the use of these systems in people with T2DM. METHODS We performed a review of AID systems with a focus on the T2DM population. RESULTS In 5 randomized controlled trials, AID systems improve time in range and reduce glycemic variability, without increasing insulin requirements or the risk of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION AID systems in T2DM are safe and effective in hospitalized and closely monitored settings. Home studies of longer duration are required to assess for long-term benefit and identify target populations of benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander B Karol
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Grenye O'Malley
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Reshmitha Fallurin
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Carol J Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sherr JL, Bode BW, Forlenza GP, Laffel LM, Schoelwer MJ, Buckingham BA, Criego AB, DeSalvo DJ, MacLeish SA, Hansen DW, Ly TT. Safety and Glycemic Outcomes With a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Arm Multicenter Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care 2022; 45:1907-1910. [PMID: 35678724 PMCID: PMC9346983 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-2359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Very young children with type 1 diabetes often struggle to achieve glycemic targets, putting them at risk for long-term complications and creating an immense management burden for caregivers. We conducted the first evaluation of the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in this population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 80 children aged 2.0-5.9 years used the investigational system in a single-arm study for 13 weeks following 14 days of baseline data collection with their usual therapy. RESULTS There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. By study end, HbA1c decreased by 0.55% (6.0 mmol/mol) (P < 0.0001). Time with sensor glucose levels in target range 70-180 mg/dL increased by 10.9%, or 2.6 h/day (P < 0.0001), while time with levels <70 mg/dL declined by median 0.27% (P = 0.0204). CONCLUSIONS Use of the automated insulin delivery system was safe, and participants experienced improved glycemic measures and reduced hypoglycemia during the study phase compared with baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Amy B. Criego
- Park Nicollet Pediatric Endocrinology, International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Sarah A. MacLeish
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH
| | - David W. Hansen
- Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Polonsky WH, Hood KK, Levy CJ, MacLeish SA, Hirsch IB, Brown SA, Bode BW, Carlson AL, Shah VN, Weinstock RS, Bhargava A, Jones TC, Aleppo G, Mehta SN, Laffel LM, Forlenza GP, Sherr JL, Huyett LM, Vienneau TE, Ly TT. How introduction of automated insulin delivery systems may influence psychosocial outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: Findings from the first investigation with the Omnipod® 5 System. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 190:109998. [PMID: 35853530 PMCID: PMC10901155 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate psychosocial outcomes for adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using the tubeless Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System. METHODS A single-arm, multicenter (across the United States), prospective safety and efficacy study of the tubeless AID system included 115 adults with T1D. Participants aged 18-70 years completed questionnaires assessing psychosocial outcomes - diabetes distress (T1-DDS), hypoglycemic confidence (HCS), well-being (WHO-5), sleep quality (PSQI), insulin delivery satisfaction (IDSS), diabetes treatment satisfaction (DTSQ), and system usability (SUS) - before and after 3 months of AID use. Associations among participant characteristics, psychosocial measures and glycemic outcomes were evaluated using linear regression analyses. RESULTS Adults using the tubeless AID system demonstrated improvements in diabetes-specific psychosocial measures, including diabetes distress, hypoglycemic confidence, insulin delivery satisfaction, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and system usability after 3 months (all P < 0.001). No changes in general well-being or sleep quality were observed. The psychosocial outcomes assessed were not consistently associated with baseline participant characteristics (i.e., age, sex, diabetes duration, glycemic outcomes including percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL, percent time below range < 70 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c, or insulin regimen). CONCLUSIONS Use of the Omnipod 5 AID system was associated with significant improvements in diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for adults with T1D. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04196140.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5230 Carrol Canyon Road Ste 208, San Diego, CA 92121, United States; University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - Korey K Hood
- Department of Pediatrics, Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, B300, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Carol J Levy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Sarah A MacLeish
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States
| | - Irl B Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 750 Republican Street, Building F, Floor 3, Seattle, WA 98109, United States
| | - Sue A Brown
- Division of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C Hunt Dr, Charlottesville, VA 22903, United States
| | - Bruce W Bode
- Atlanta Diabetes Associates, 1800 Howell Mill Rd #450, Atlanta, GA 30318, United States
| | - Anders L Carlson
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet, HealthPartners, 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd, Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States
| | - Viral N Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1775 Aurora Ct #A140, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Ruth S Weinstock
- Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Anuj Bhargava
- Iowa Diabetes Research, 1031 Office Park Rd Suite #2, West Des Moines, IA 50265, United States
| | - Thomas C Jones
- Department of Research, East Coast Institute for Research at The Jones Center, 265 Sheraton Blvd, Macon, GA 31210, United States
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 N Michigan Ave Ste 530, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Sanjeev N Mehta
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1775 Aurora Ct #A140, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Jennifer L Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | - Lauren M Huyett
- Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, United States
| | - Todd E Vienneau
- Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, United States
| | - Trang T Ly
- Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, United States.
| |
Collapse
|