Buss SJ, Humpert PM, Bekeredjian R, Hardt SE, Zugck C, Schellberg D, Bauer A, Filusch A, Kuecherer H, Katus HA, Korosoglou G. Echocardiographic phase imaging to predict reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;
2:535-43. [PMID:
19442937 DOI:
10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.003]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2008] [Revised: 03/06/2009] [Accepted: 03/10/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The aim of our study was to investigate whether echocardiographic phase imaging (EPI) can predict response in patients who are considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
BACKGROUND
CRT improves quality of life, exercise capacity, and outcome in patients with bundle-branch block and advanced heart failure. Previous studies used QRS duration to select patients for CRT; the accuracy of this parameter to predict functional recovery, however, is controversial.
METHODS
We examined 42 patients with advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III to IV, QRS duration >130 ms, and ejection fraction <35%) before and 6 to 8 months after CRT. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was estimated by calculating the SD of time to peak velocities (Ts-SD) by conventional tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), and the mean phase index (mean EPI-Index) was calculated by EPI in 12 mid-ventricular and basal segments. Patients who were alive and had significant relative decrease in end-systolic LV volume of Delta ESV >or=15% at 6 to 8 months of follow-up were defined as responders. All others were classified as nonresponders.
RESULTS
The Ts-SD and the mean EPI-Index were related to Delta ESV (r = 0.43 for Ts-SD and r = 0.67 for mean EPI-Index, p < 0.01 for both), and both parameters yielded similar accuracy for the prediction of LV remodeling (area under the curve of 0.87 for TDI vs. 0.90 for EPI, difference between areas = 0.03, p = NS) and ejection fraction (EF) improvement (area under the curve of 0.87 for TDI vs. 0.93 for EPI, difference between areas = 0.06, p = NS). Furthermore, patients classified as responders by EPI (mean EPI-Index <or=59%) showed significant improvement in NYHA functional class and in 6-min walk test (409 +/- 88 m at follow-up vs. 312 +/- 86 m initially, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Echocardiographic phase imaging can predict functional recovery, reverse LV remodeling, and clinical outcomes in patients who undergo CRT. EPI is a method that objectively and accurately quantifies LV dyssynchrony and seems to be noninferior to TDI for the prediction of reverse LV remodeling and functional recovery.
Collapse