ACE I/D Polymorphism, Plasma ACE Levels, and Long-term Kidney Outcomes or All-Cause Death in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Genetic predisposition to nephropathy and associated cardiovascular disease in people with type 1 diabetes: role of the angiotensinI-converting enzyme (ACE), and beyond; a narrative review

Hypertension, cardiovascular disease and kidney failure are associated with persistent hyperglycaemia and the subsequent development of nephropathy in people with diabetes. Diabetic nephropathy is associated with widespread vascular disease affecting both the kidney and the heart from an early stage. However, the risk of diabetic nephropathy in people with type 1 diabetes is strongly genetically determined, as documented in familial transmission studies. The search for the underlying genes has been extensive, using specific hypotheses, sibling linkage studies and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The role of the angiotensinI-converting enzyme/kininase II (ACE) gene and genetic variability in ACE levels as a susceptibility and prognostic factor for diabetic nephropathy has been well documented in people with type 1 diabetes. The ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism, which is associated with plasma and tissue ACE levels, has been the most studied genomic variant in diabetic nephropathy. Recently, this polymorphism has also been associated with longevity in people with type 1 diabetes. The ACE I/D polymorphism has also been associated with vascular, extra-renal complications including myocardial infarction and lower-limb amputation in this population. Other genes and loci have been identified in linkage studies and GWAS, such as the COL4A3 gene or a region on chromosome 3q with the adiponectin gene. Replication was not always attempted and was rarely achieved, even for GWAS. Overall, effect sizes remain modest and no major gene has been identified, despite the strength of the genetic effect in transmission studies. We searched bibliographic databases for studies reporting genomic variants associated with diabetic nephropathy and meta-analyses of such studies. We selected important relevant studies for further discussion in this narrative review. This brief review attempts to summarise the current knowledge on the genetics of diabetic nephropathy and associated cardiovascular disease in people with type 1 diabetes, and discusses some conceptual and methodological issues relevant to the interpretation of past studies and the design of future ones.

Review on Molecular Mechanism of Hypertensive Nephropathy

Hypertension, a prevalent chronic ailment, has the potential to impair kidney function, and thereby resulting in hypertensive nephropathy. The escalating incidence of hypertensive nephropathy attributed to the aging population in urban areas, has emerged as a prominent cause of end-stage renal disease. Nevertheless, the intricate pathogenesis of hypertensive nephropathy poses considerable obstacles in terms of precise clinical diagnosis and treatment. This paper aims to consolidate the research findings on the pathogenesis of hypertensive nephropathy by focusing on the perspective of molecular biology.

Redox Genetic Risk Score and the Incidence of End-Stage Kidney Disease in People with Type 1 Diabetes

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a multifactorial condition influenced by genetic background, but the extent to which a genetic risk score (GRS) improves ESKD prediction is unknown. We built a redox GRS on the base of previous association studies (six polymorphisms from six redox genes) and tested its relationship with ESKD in three cohorts of people with type 1 diabetes. Among 1012 participants, ESKD (hemodialysis requirement, kidney transplantation, eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m²) occurred in 105 (10.4%) during a 14-year follow-up. High redox GRS was associated with increased ESKD risk (adjusted HR for the upper versus the lowest GRS tertile: 2.60 (95% CI, 1.51-4.48), p = 0.001). Each additional risk-allele was associated with a 20% increased risk of ESKD (95% CI, 8-33, p < 0.0001). High GRS yielded a relevant population attributable fraction (30%), but only a marginal enhancement in c-statistics index (0.928 [0.903-0.954]) over clinical factors 0.921 (0.892-0.950), p = 0.04). This is the first report of an independent association between redox GRS and increased risk of ESKD in type 1 diabetes. Our results do not support the use of this GRS in clinical practice but provide new insights into the involvement of oxidative stress genetic factors in ESKD risk in type 1 diabetes.

Association Between the ACE Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and Risk of Lower-Limb Amputation in Patients With Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism has been widely studied in people with diabetes, albeit not with regard to lower-limb amputation (LLA). We examined associations among this polymorphism, plasma ACE concentration, and LLA in people with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

ACE I/D genotype and plasma ACE were assessed in three prospective cohorts of participants with type 1 diabetes. LLA was defined as minor (below-the-ankle amputation consisting of at least one ray metatarsal resection) or major (transtibial or transfemoral) amputation. Linear, logistic, and Cox regression models were computed to evaluate the likelihood of prevalent and incident LLA by ACE genotype (XD [ID or ID] vs. II) and plasma ACE, after adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Among 1,301 participants (male 54%, age 41 ± 13 years), 90 (6.9%) had a baseline history of LLA. Baseline LLA was more prevalent in XD (7.4%) than in II genotype (4.5%, odds ratio [OR] 2.17 [95 %CI 1.03-4.60]). Incident LLA occurred in 53 individuals during the 14-year follow-up and was higher in XD versus II carriers (hazard ratio 3.26 [95% CI 1.16-13.67]). This association was driven by excess risk of minor, but not major, LLA. The D allele was associated with increased prevalent LLA at the end of follow-up (OR 2.48 [1.33-4.65]). LLA was associated with higher mean (95% CI) ACE levels in II (449 [360, 539] vs. 354 [286, 423] ng/mL), but not XD (512 [454, 570] vs. 537 [488, 586]), carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This report is the first of an independent association between ACE D allele and excess LLA risk, mainly minor amputations, in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphisms AND Alzheimer's disease susceptibility: An updated meta-analysis

Background

Many studies among different ethnic populations suggested that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphisms were associated with susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the results remained inconclusive. In the present meta-analysis, we aimed to clarify the effect of ACE polymorphisms on AD risk using all available relevant data.

Methods

Systemic literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, Alzgene and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Relevant data were abstracted according to predefined criteria.

Results

Totally, 82 independent cohorts from 65 studies were included, focusing on five candidate polymorphisms. For rs1799752 polymorphism, in overall analyses, the insertion (I) allele conferred increased risk to AD compared to the deletion (D) allele (I vs. D: OR = 1.091, 95% CI = 1.007–1.181, p = 0.032); while the I carriers showed increased AD susceptibility compared with the D homozygotes (II + ID vs. DD: OR = 1.131, 95% CI = 1.008–1.270, p = 0.036). However, none of the positive results passed FDR adjustment. In subgroup analysis restricted to late-onset individuals, the associations between rs1799752 polymorphism and AD risk were identified using allelic comparison (OR = 1.154, 95% CI = 1.028–1.295, p = 0.015, FDR = 0.020), homozygotes comparison, dominant model and recessive model (II vs. ID + DD: OR = 1.272, 95% CI = 1.120–1.444, p < 0.001, FDR < 0.001). Nevertheless, no significant association could be revealed after excluding studies not in accordance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). In North Europeans, but not in East Asians, the I allele demonstrated increased AD susceptibility compared to the D allele (OR = 1.096, 95% CI = 1.021–1.178, p = 0.012, FDR = 0.039). After excluding HWE-deviated cohorts, significant associations were also revealed under homozygotes comparison, additive model (ID vs. DD: OR = 1.266, 95% CI = 1.045–1.534, p = 0.016, FDR = 0.024) and dominant model (II + ID vs. DD: OR = 1.197, 95% CI = 1.062–1.350, p = 0.003, FDR = 0.018) in North Europeans. With regard to rs1800764 polymorphism, significant associations were identified particularly in subgroup of European descent under allelic comparison (T vs. C: OR = 1.063, 95% CI = 1.008–1.120, p = 0.023, FDR = 0.046), additive model and dominant model (TT + TC vs. CC: OR = 1.116, 95% CI = 1.018–1.222, p = 0.019, FDR = 0.046). But after excluding studies not satisfying HWE, all these associations disappeared. No significant associations were detected for rs4343, rs4291 and rs4309 polymorphisms in any genetic model.

Conclusions

Our results suggested the significant but modest associations between rs1799752 polymorphism and risk to AD in North Europeans. While rs4343, rs4291 and rs4309 polymorphisms are unlikely to be major factors in AD development in our research.