Insulin autoantibodies and insulin assay

Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Insulin Autoantibody-Mediated Glycaemic Dysregulation and Hyperinsulinaemic Hypoglycaemia: Insulin Autoimmune Syndrome and Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome

Autoimmune glycaemic dysregulation and hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia mediated by insulin autoantibodies is an increasingly recognised but controversial phenomenon described in both exogenous insulin naïve (insulin autoimmune syndrome) and exposed (exogenous insulin antibody syndrome) individuals. There has been a significant proliferation of case reports, clinical studies and reviews in the medical literature in recent years which have collectively highlighted the discrepancy between experts in the field with regard to the nomenclature, definition, proposed pathophysiology, as well as the clinical and biochemical diagnostic criteria associated with the condition. The essential characteristics of the condition are glycaemic dysregulation manifesting as episodes of hyperglycaemia and unpredictable hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia associated with high titres of endogenous antibodies to insulin. Although the hypoglycaemia is often life-threatening and initiation of targeted therapies critical, the diagnosis is often delayed and attributable to various factors including: the fact that existence of the condition is not universally accepted; the need to exclude surreptitious causes of hypoglycaemia; the diverse and often complex nature of the glycaemic dysregulation; and the challenge of diagnostic confirmation. Once confirmed, the available therapeutic options are expansive and the reported responses to these therapies have been variable. This review will focus on our evolving understanding, and the associated diagnostic challenges - both clinical and laboratory - of this complex condition.

Therapeutic plasma exchange normalizes insulin-mediated response in a child with type 1 diabetes and insulin autoimmune syndrome

BACKGROUND

Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS), characterized by glycemic dysregulation and life-threatening hypoglycemia, can occur in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Diagnostic confirmation is complex but important in order to ensure timely initiation of definitive therapy.

AIMS

We aimed to quantitate the degree of immunoglobulin-insulin complex (IIC) formation and its effects on glycemic control in a patient with T1D and IAS compared with T1D and non-T1D controls and before and after therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).

MATERIALS & METHODS

The prospective descriptive study was conducted between June 2015 and December 2015 in a quaternary children's hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Percent Free "Immunoreactive" Insulin (%FII) as assessed by polyethylene glycol precipitation studies and its relationship to plasma glucose and serum insulin concentration.

RESULTS

Samples from the patient with T1D and IAS demonstrated lower mean %FII compared to T1D (23.8 ± 2.0 vs 52.0 ± 6.7; P < .0001) and non-T1D (23.8 ± 2.0 vs 102.9 ± 2.7; P < .0001) controls. This was associated with loss of glycemic predictability and frequent severe hypoglycemia. TPE increased %FII (23.8 ± 2.0 before TPE vs 83.6 ± 2.5 after TPE, P < .0001) and reestablished plasma glucose responsiveness to exogenous insulin.

DISCUSSION

IAS should be considered in T1D patients with unexplained glycemic instability and hypoglycemia. The laboratory plays an integral diagnostic role.

CONCLUSION

TPE is an effective method for removing IICs and normalizing insulin-mediated glucose responses.

Insights in regulated bioanalysis of human insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods

Despite the long and illustrious history of insulin and insulin analogs as important biotherapeutics, the regulated bioanalysis (in this article, regulated bioanalysis refers to the formalized process for generating bioanalytical data to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments intended for development of insulin and insulin analogs as biotherapeutics, as opposed to the analytical process used for measuring insulin as a biomarker) of these peptides remains a challenging endeavor for a number of reasons. Paramount is the fact that the therapeutic concentrations are often low in serum/plasma and not too dissimilar from the endogenous level, particularly in patients with insulin resistance, such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Accordingly, this perspective was written to provide helpful background information for the design and conduct of immunoassays to support regulated bioanalysis of insulin and insulin analogs. Specifically, it highlights the technical challenges for determination of insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods that are intended to support evaluations of pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics. In a broader sense, this perspective describes the general bioanalytical issues that are common to regulated bioanalysis of peptides and articulates some of the bioanalytical differences between conventional monoclonal antibodies and peptide therapeutics.

The effects of anti-insulin antibodies and cross-reactivity with human recombinant insulin analogues in the E170 insulin immunometric assay

BACKGROUND

Insulin assays are affected by varying degrees of interference from anti-insulin antibodies (IAs) and by cross-reactivity with recombinant insulin analogues. We evaluated the usefulness of the E170 insulin assay by assessing IA effects and cross-reactivity with 2 analogues.

METHODS

Sera were obtained from 59 type 2 diabetes patients receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and 18 healthy controls. Insulin levels were determined using an E170 analyzer. To investigate the effects of IAs, we performed IA radioimmunoassays, and analyzed the differences between directly measured insulin (direct insulin) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-treated insulins (free, IA-unbound; total, IA-bound and unbound insulin). We performed in-vitro cross-reactivity tests with insulin aspart and insulin glulisine.

RESULTS

In IA-positive patients, E170 free insulin levels measured using the E170 analyzer were significantly lower than the direct insulin levels. The mean value of the direct/free insulin ratio and IA-bound insulin, which were calculated as the difference between total and free insulin, increased significantly as endogenous IA levels increased. The E170 insulin assay showed low cross-reactivities with both analogues (< 0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

IAs interfered with E170 insulin assay, and the extent of interference correlated with the IA levels, which may be attributable to the increase in IA-bound insulin, and not to an error in the assay. The E170 insulin assay may measure only endogenous insulin since cross-reactivity is low. Our results suggest that the measurement of free insulin after PEG pre-treatment could be useful for beta cell function assessment in diabetic patients undergoing insulin therapy.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of insulin in rat and human plasma

A rapid and simple isocratic chromatographic procedure for the determination of insulin in human and rat plasma using reversed-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet/visible detector is described. The method includes extraction of insulin from human and rat plasma into dichloromethane, followed by back-extraction into 0.05 N hydrochloric acid. The organic phase was evaporated under a stream of nitrogen. The aqueous phase was filtered and a 100 microliters aliquot was analyzed on a RP-C18 column eluted with a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of 74 vol of 0.2 M sodium sulfate anhydrous adjusted to pH 2.3 with phosphoric acid and 26 vol of acetonitrile. The flow rate was 1.2 ml/min and the wavelength was set at 214 nm. The calibration curve was linear over the range of 75-800 microIU/ml. The precision of the assay expressed as coefficients of variation was less than 6% over the entire concentration range. The recovery for insulin ranged from 79 to 81% from human and rat plasma, with coefficients of variation less than 6%. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 5.7%. The limit of detection was 50 microIU/ml.