Effects of the early ACE inhibition in diabetic nonthrombolyzed patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction

Hydrogen sulfide and vascular regulation - An update

BACKGROUND

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is considered to be the third gasotransmitter after carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO). It plays an important role in the regulation of vascular homeostasis. Vascular remodeling have has proved to be related to the impaired H₂S generation.

AIM OF REVIEW

This study aimed to summarize and discuss current data about the function of H₂S in vascular physiology and pathophysiology as well as the underlying mechanisms.

KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW

Endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) as a third gasotransmitter is primarily generated by the enzymatic pathways and regulated by several metabolic pathways. H₂S as a physiologic vascular regulator, inhibits proliferation, regulates its apoptosis and autophagy of vascular cells and controls the vascular tone. Accumulating evidence shows that the downregulation of H₂S pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of vascular diseases, such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and pulmonary hypertension. Alternatively, H₂S supplementation may greatly help to prevent the progression of the vascular diseases by regulating vascular tone, inhibiting vascular inflammation, protecting against oxidative stress and proliferation, and modulating vascular cell apoptosis, which has been verified in animal and cell experiments and even in the clinical investigation. Besides, H₂S system and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors play a vital role in alleviating ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Notably, sulfhydryl-containing ACEI inhibitor zofenopril is superior to other ACE inhibitors due to its capability of H₂S releasing, in addition to ACE inhibition. The design and application of novel H₂S donors have significant clinical implications in the treatment of vascular-related diseases. However, further research regarding the role of H₂S in vascular physiology and pathophysiology is required.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition: Beyond Blood Pressure Control-The Role of Zofenopril

The extensive use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) as antihypertensive agents and the huge amount of data collected in clinical trials and post-marketing studies has allowed the extending of the indication of ACEIs beyond blood pressure control. Current guidelines recommend ACEIs in symptomatic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to decrease the risk of heart failure hospitalization, and also in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-elevation with or without post-AMI ventricular dysfunction. Analyzing the association between the choice of an ACEI after AMI with the risk of mortality and re-infarction, a class effect, rather than the superiority of some agents, has been described. The focus of this review is centered on the role of ACEIs in addition to and beyond blood pressure control. It summarizes clinical evidence on the use of these agents in cardiovascular diseases, with a specific interest in the experience with zofenopril, which presents a peculiar pharmacological profile that may contribute to additional clinical benefits in some identifiable populations of patients. Indeed, the presence of a sulfhydryl group in its structure confers on zofenopril high anti-oxidant and anti-ischemic properties involving the activation of the H₂S system, resulting in a cardioprotective effect. The efficacy and safety of zofenopril have been extensively evaluated and proved in the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Evaluation (SMILE) program in numerous clinical settings. The pharmacological features and ancillary characteristics of zofenopril with potent cardioprotective effects seem to differentiate it from other ACEIs and to confer further benefits to patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Zofenopril Versus Ramipril in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: A Review of the Published and Unpublished Data of the Randomized Double-Blind SMILE-4 Study

Zofenopril is a lipophilic, sulfhydryl group-containing angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor, characterized by wide tissue distribution, long duration of action, and pleiotropic effects on endothelial dysfunction. Its clinical efficacy and safety have been described in the four randomized controlled trials of the SMILE program, which globally enrolled more than 3600 patients in post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) setting. The SMILE-4 study specifically selected patients with left ventricular dysfunction at admission, and compared the effects of zofenopril or ramipril in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Zofenopril demonstrated its superiority over ramipril in reducing the combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes both in the overall population included in the original study and in subgroups of patients at highest risk, namely hypertensive and diabetic subjects. The effects of the early treatment with zofenopril were sustained over time, and, after 5 years of follow-up, zofenopril increased the survival likelihood and reduced the hospitalization rate. Compared to ramipril, zofenopril was cost-effective with a number to treat of 13 and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 2125.45 euros for any additional event prevented. Furthermore, in real-world settings, zofenopril decreased the risk of death in patients with heart failure, particularly in men, and in subjects older than 76 years or with ejection fraction lower than 54%. These results support the early use of zofenopril immediately after AMI, even in the presence of comorbidities, and its maintenance over time to reduce the risk of heart failure.

FUNDING

Menarini International Operations Luxembourg S.A.

Efficacy of Zofenopril Compared With Placebo and Other Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Previous Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Pooled Individual Data Analysis of 4 Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Prospective Studies

In the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation (SMILE) 1, 3, and 4 studies, early administration of zofenopril in acute myocardial infarction showed to be prognostically beneficial versus placebo or ramipril. The SMILE-2 showed that both zofenopril and lisinopril are safe and showed no significant differences in the incidence of major cardiovascular (CV) complications. In this pooled analysis of individual data of the SMILE studies, we evaluated whether the superior efficacy of zofenopril is maintained also in patients with ≥1 CV risk factor (CV+, n = 2962) as compared to CV− (n = 668). The primary study end point was set to 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for CV causes. The risk of CV events was significantly reduced with zofenopril versus placebo either in the CV+ (−37%; hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.78; P = 0.0001) or in the CV− group (−55%; hazard ratio: 0.45; 0.26–0.78; P = 0.004). Also, the other angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduced the risk of major CV outcomes, though the reduction was not statistically significant versus placebo (CV+: 0.78; 0.58–1.05; P = 0.107; CV−: 0.71; 0.36–1.41; P = 0.334). The benefit was larger in patients treated with zofenopril than other angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with a statistically significant difference for CV+ (0.79; 0.63–0.99; P = 0.039) versus CV− (0.62; 0.37–1.06; P = 0.081). In conclusion, zofenopril administered to patients after acute myocardial infarction has a positive impact on prognosis, regardless of the patient's CV risk profile.

Zofenopril and Ramipril in Combination with Acetyl Salicylic Acid in Postmyocardial Infarction Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Retrospective Analysis of the SMILE-4 Randomized, Double-Blind Study in Diabetic Patients

OBJECTIVE

In the SMILE-4 study, zofenopril + acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) was more effective than ramipril + ASA on 1-year prevention of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated drug efficacy in subgroups of patients, according to a history of diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The primary study endpoint was 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. Diabetes was defined according to medical history (previous known diagnosis).

RESULTS

A total of 562 of 693 (81.0%) patients were classified as nondiabetics and 131 (18.9%) as diabetics. The adjusted rate of MACE was lower under zofenopril than under ramipril in both nondiabetics [27.9% vs. 34.9% ramipril; odds ratio, OR and 95% confidence interval: 0.55 (0.35, 0.86)] and diabetics [30.9% vs. 41.3%; 0.56 (0.18, 1.73)], although the difference was statistically significant only for the nondiabetic group (P = 0.013). Zofenopril was superior to ramipril as regards to the primary study endpoint in the subgroup of 157 patients with uncontrolled blood glucose (≥ 126 mg/dL), regardless of a previous diagnosis of diabetes [0.31 (0.10, 0.90), P = 0.030]. Zofenopril significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes in both nondiabetics [0.64 (0.43, 0.96), P = 0.030] and diabetics [0.38 (0.15, 0.95), P = 0.038], whereas it was not better than ramipril in terms of prevention of cardiovascular deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis of the SMILE-4 study confirmed the good efficacy of zofenopril plus ASA in the prevention of long-term MACE also in the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus.

In-hospital daily insulin dose predicts long-term adverse outcome in patients with diabetes with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with successful primary percutaneous angioplasty

INTRODUCTION

Early initiation of reperfusion therapy including primary percutaneous coronary revascularization (PPCI) has been recognized as a crucial factor determining clinical outcomes in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. In unstable patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) the clear benefit from PPCI was proven. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of factors describing glycometabolic state on admission in patients with T2D undergoing PPCI in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective analysis of clinical and laboratory variables (mean daily short acting exogenous insulin dose (DID), admission blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), microalbuminuria) was performed in 112 consecutive patients with T2D with STEMI who underwent PPCI. Women comprised 58% of the group.

RESULTS

Insulin dosing was targeted to obtain a mean daily glucose level < 7.8 mmol/l. During 12-month follow-up 33 (29.5%) major adverse cardiac events (major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisting of death, reinfarction, and repeated target vessel revascularization) were reported. Microalbuminuria was present in 68 (60.5%) patients. The mean HbA1c level was 7.9%. In the multivariate logistic regression model only DID > 44 IU remained an independent risk factor for MACE (p = 0.02, OR = 5.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with diabetes with STEMI treated with PPCI, simple measurement of DID during hospitalization can add valuable prognostic information about the future risk of MACE.

Antihypertensive effect of zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide versus zofenopril monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension according to their cardiovascular risk level: A post hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, possibly in combination with other antihypertensive drugs, to treat hypertension with associated risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive effect of the combination of zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide versus zofenopril monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension, according to their cardiovascular risk level.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a previously published efficacy and tolerability study. After a 4-week placebo washout, patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95-115 mm Hg), aged 18 to 75 years, were randomized at a ratio of 2:1:1 to treatment with zofenopril 30 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or monotherapy with zofenopril 30 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 12 weeks in an international, multicenter, double-blind study. This period was followed by 24 weeks of open-label treatment. Systolic BP [SBP] and DBP were measured by mercury sphygmomanometry, and changes associated with treatment were calculated. Patients' cardiovascular risk was computed using the Heart Score algorithm. Patients were classified in quartiles according to distribution of cardiovascular risk level, and comparisons were limited to the zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and zofenopril monotherapy treatment groups. The primary end point was change in office DBP.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-six patients (139 men, 107 women; mean [SD] age, 54 [11] years) were included in the analysis. Mean baseline cardiovascular risk was similar in the zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide group and the zofenopril monotherapy group (7% vs 9%). DBP and SBP reductions with treatment were significantly greater (both, P < 0.01) with combination treatment than with monotherapy for each quartile of cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular risk reduction at the end of the 12 weeks of double-blind treatment was greater in the zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide group than in the zofenopril monotherapy group (1.9% vs 0.2%; P < 0.01), particularly in the group of patients with the highest cardiovascular risk at baseline (5.2% vs 2.0%). At the end of the 24-week open-label treatment period, the mean reduction in cardiovascular risk was also significantly greater in the combination treatment group than in the monotherapy group (1.4% vs 0.5%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In these hypertensive patients, combination treatment with zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide was associated with a significantly greater decrease in BP compared with zofenopril monotherapy, regardless of the patient's cardiovascular risk. The difference between combination treatment and monotherapy was particularly evident for the group of patients at highest risk.

Use of the ACE inhibitor zofenopril in the treatment of ischemic heart disease

Zofenopril, an inhibitor of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), has recently been widely introduced into the pharmaceutical market. Its clinical safety and efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with hypertension and in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation (SMILE) project provided valuable information regarding the safety of early onset ACE inhibition with zofenopril after AMI and a greater perception of the early and late benefits. The SMILE-I study demonstrated that most benefits of ACE inhibition may be obtained early after AMI and persist after discontinuation of treatment. The SMILE-II study demonstrated that early zofenopril treatment (initiated <12 h) is safe and associated with a low rate of severe hypotension in thrombolyzed patients with acute myocardial infarction when administered in accordance with an adequate dose-titration scheme. Many other studies of clinical ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs) over the last 30 years have provided us with information in order to understand the effects of ACEIs and have demonstrated that patients benefit from ACEI treatment at different stages of the pathophysiological continuum of cardiovascular diseases. The current guidelines recommend that ACEIs should be used for routine secondary prevention in all patients with coronary artery disease and should be considered for all other patients with coronary or other vascular disease unless contraindicated.

Long-term clinical experience with zofenopril

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are extensively used to improve clinical outcome of patients with several cardiovascular diseases. Zofenopril proved to be very effective in patients with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction, thanks to its unique effective mechanism of action for improving blood pressure control, left ventricular function and myocardial ischemia burden, as well as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. The SMILE project involved more than 3500 patients with coronary artery disease and demonstrated that zofenopril treatment may reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction, also when combined with acetyl salicylic acid and to a greater extent than lisinopril and ramipril. In addition, the results of the SMILE-ISCHEMIA study have demonstrated an interesting anti-ischemic effect of zofenopril, and these properties largely contribute to the overall clinical benefit of the drug. The effects of zofenopril on blood pressure control and cardiovascular protection clearly support its primary role for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

POTENTIAL OF THE MODERN ACE INHIBITOR ZOFENOPRIL IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: CARDIOPROTECTIVE, ANTI-ISCHEMIC, AND ANTIATHEROGENIC EFFECTS

The review discusses various aspects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The focus is on the modern ACE inhibitor zofenopril, its specific pharmacological characteristics, and additional cardioprotective, anti-ischemic, and antiatherogenic effects. The existing evidence of clinical effectiveness of zofenopril and its potential for a wider use in clinical practice are also addressed. 

Modern opportunities for optimising the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease and arterial hypertension: role of zofenopril

The wide prevalence (82%) of coronary heart disease (CHD) in combination with arterial hypertension (AH), as well as its initiating role in the development of fatal complications, such as myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure, emphasise the need for the choice of optimal ACE inhibitors with organ-protective characteristics. This paper presents a literature review on the effectiveness of a SH-containing ACE inhibitor zofenopril in patients with CHD and AH, in terms of its anti-anginal and antihypertensive activity. The authors summarise the results of the international SMILE studies which included patients after acute MI. It was demonstrated that zofenopril therapy is associated with reduced combined incidence of cardiovascular death or cardiovascular hospitalisation, and is also safe in the acute post-MI period. In patients with preserved left ventricular function, zofenopril reduced the incidence of angina attacks and arrhythmias of coronary genesis, as well as improved exercise capacity. A clinical case of zofenopril therapy, as a part of a complex treatment regimen, is also presented.

Enhanced Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in leukocytes of patients with chronic kidney disease

Previously, we demonstrated increased Angiotensin II type I receptor expression in leukocytes from patients with untreated, but not in treated, essential hypertension (essential hypertension). We hypothesized that the Angiotensin II AT1 receptor is also increased in leukocytes from patients with chronic kidney disease, however and can still be corrected with combined anti-hypertensive treatment with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and statins. Blood pressure, cholesterol, renal function oxidative stress parameters, inflammation, and leukocyte Angiotensin II AT1 receptor mRNA expression were measured both on and (6 weeks) off treatment. Data were compared to data of 10 healthy control subjects. Untreated chronic kidney disease patients (n=20) had higher blood pressure, cholesterol and leukocyte Angiotensin II AT1 receptor mRNA expression, but no different ox-LDL, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, paraoxonase activity or hs-CRP. OxLDL and Lipoprotein(a) were increased in untreated chronic kidney disease. Angiotensin II AT1 receptor expression inversely correlated with renal function (R(2)=0.15, P<0.03) and Lipoprotein(a) but not with the other parameters. Treatment with RAS blockers and statins normalized blood pressure and cholesterol, however it did not correct enhanced leukocyte Angiotensin II AT1 receptor expression. Leukocyte Angiotensin II AT1 receptor expression is inappropriately high in chronic kidney disease, correlates inversely with renal function and does not depend on antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment. The uremic environment seems to dominate over previously reported actions of high blood pressure and cholesterol to enhance leukocyte Angiotensin II AT1 receptor expression.

Effect of early treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs on short and long-term mortality in patients with an acute cardiovascular event

BACKGROUND

Acute cardiovascular events represent a therapeutic challenge. Blood pressure lowering drugs are commonly used and recommended in the early phase of these settings. This review analyses randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for this approach.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of immediate and short-term administration of anti-hypertensive drugs on all-cause mortality, total non-fatal serious adverse events (SAE) and blood pressure, in patients with an acute cardiovascular event, regardless of blood pressure at the time of enrollment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane clinical trial register from Jan 1966 to February 2009 were searched. Reference lists of articles were also browsed. In case of missing information from retrieved articles, authors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-hypertensive drug with placebo or no treatment administered to patients within 24 hours of the onset of an acute cardiovascular event.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Fixed effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five RCTs (N=166,206) were included, evaluating four classes of anti-hypertensive drugs: ACE inhibitors (12 trials), beta-blockers (20), calcium channel blockers (18) and nitrates (18). Acute stroke was studied in 6 trials (all involving CCBs). Acute myocardial infarction was studied in 59 trials. In the latter setting immediate nitrate treatment (within 24 hours) reduced all-cause mortality during the first 2 days (RR 0.81, 95%CI [0.74,0.89], p<0.0001). No further benefit was observed with nitrate therapy beyond this point. ACE inhibitors did not reduce mortality at 2 days (RR 0.91,95%CI [0.82, 1.00]), but did after 10 days (RR 0.93, 95%CI [0.87,0.98] p=0.01). No other blood pressure lowering drug administered as an immediate treatment or short-term treatment produced a statistical significant mortality reduction at 2, 10 or >/=30 days. There was not enough data studying acute stroke, and there were no RCTs evaluating other acute cardiovascular events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Nitrates reduce mortality (4-8 deaths prevented per 1000) at 2 days when administered within 24 hours of symptom onset of an acute myocardial infarction. No mortality benefit was seen when treatment continued beyond 48 hours. Mortality benefit of immediate treatment with ACE inhibitors post MI at 2 days did not reach statistical significance but the effect was significant at 10 days (2-4 deaths prevented per 1000). There is good evidence for lack of a mortality benefit with immediate or short-term treatment with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers for acute myocardial infarction.

Effects of early treatment with zofenopril in patients with myocardial infarction and metabolic syndrome: the SMILE Study

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the early administration of zofenopril in a group of patients with and without metabolic syndrome (MS+ and MS−) and anterior myocardial infarction enrolled in the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Evaluation (SMILE) Study.

Methods

Patients were randomized double-blind to zofenopril (n = 719) or placebo (n = 699) for 6 weeks. The primary end point was the effect of treatment on the 6-week combined occurrence of death and severe congestive heart failure. The secondary end point was the 1-year mortality rate.

Results

Of the 1418 patients included in this post-hoc analysis, 686 (48.3%) had MS. After 6 weeks of treatment zofenopril significantly reduced the incidence of all-cause death and severe congestive failure (risk reduction: 69%, 95% CI: 7–78; 2p = 0.002) in MS+ patients. This was the case for 1-year mortality, too (29%, 95% CI: 4–41; 2p = 0.048). Zofenopril was effective also in MS− patients but the amount of relative risk reduction was less than in MS+ for both the primary (−11%; 2p = 0.61) and secondary endpoint (−19%; 2p = 0.025).

Conclusions

Results of this post-hoc analysis of the SMILE Study demonstrate the striking benefit of early administration of zofenopril in MS+ patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.

Antihypertensive efficacy of zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination for treatment in metabolic syndrome

This study was undertaken to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of zofenopril 30 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg fixed combination versus zofenopril alone in patients with essential hypertension with and without the metabolic syndrome, according to National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. After a 4-wk placebo washout period, 463 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95-115 mm Hg) aged 18 to 75 y were randomly assigned 2:1:1 to treatment with zofenopril+hydrochlorothiazide, zofenopril, or hydrochlorothiazide for 12 wk in an international, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study. DBP and systolic blood pressure changes with treatment were calculated. The first 12 wk of treatment were followed by a 24-wk open-label period during which only safety was assessed. Reported here is a subanalysis of the main study results, performed in patients with and without metabolic syndrome, limited to a zofenopril+hydrochlorothiazide versus zofenopril comparison. The antihypertensive effect of zofenopril+hydrochlorothiazide or zofenopril was similar in patients with (77%) and without metabolic syndrome. In patients with and without metabolic syndrome, however, DBP and systolic blood pressure reductions were significantly greater with zofenopril+hydrochlorothiazide (with metabolic syndrome: 14+/-8/21+/-14 mm Hg; without metabolic syndrome: 15+/-7/23+/-14 mm Hg) than with zofenopril alone (with metabolic syndrome: 10+/-9/11+/-15; without metabolic syndrome: 12+/-10/14+/-18 mm Hg). The safety of the 2 treatments was similar in patients with and without metabolic syndrome. The fixed combination of zofenopril+hydrochlorothiazide improved the efficacy of zofenopril alone. This effect was particularly evident in patients with metabolic syndrome, in whom blood pressure control is more difficult to achieve and who are at greater risk for cardiovascular events.

Effects of zofenopril on myocardial ischemia in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved left ventricular function: the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation (SMILE)-ISCHEMIA study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate the cardioprotective effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with preserved left ventricular function (LVF).

METHODS

Three hundred forty-nine post-MI patients with preserved LVF (LV ejection fraction >40%) were treated for 6 months with zofenopril 30 to 60 mg (n = 177) or placebo (n = 172) according to a double-blind, randomized study design. The primary end point of the study was the combined occurrence of significant ST-T abnormalities on ambulatory electrocardiography (ECG), ECG abnormalities or symptoms of angina during standard exercise test, recurrence of MI, and need for revascularization procedures for angina.

RESULTS

The primary end point occurred in 20.3% of zofenopril-treated and 35.9% of placebo-treated patients (P = .001), despite no differences in blood pressure control, LVF, and concomitant therapy. ST-T depression during ambulatory ECG occurred in 22.7% of patients treated with placebo and 10.7% of those undergoing ACE-inhibition treatment (P = .027). ST-T depression in response to exercise test occurred in 14.2% and 26.7% of patients treated with zofenopril or placebo, respectively, (P = .024), with a lower proportion of zofenopril-treated patients who complained of anginal pain (4.7 vs 14.3%; P = .017), significant ST depression (14.2 vs 26.7%; P = .024), and major ventricular arrhythmias (3.8 vs 10.5%; P = .048). The rate of major cardiovascular events was reduced in patients treated with ACE inhibitor, with a lower rate of development and progression of congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the SMILE-ISCHEMIA study support the cardioprotective role of zofenopril when given to patients with normal LVF after acute MI.

Fixed combination of zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in the management of hypertension: a review of available data

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors effectively interfere with the renin-angiotensin system and exert various beneficial actions on vascular structure and function beyond their blood pressure-lowering effects. Zofenopril, a potent sulphydryl ACE inhibitor, is characterized by high lipophilicity, sustained cardiac ACE inhibition, and antioxidant and tissue protective activities. Its ancillary properties, such as antioxidant activity and cardiovascular (CV) protection, make this drug potentially suitable for the treatment and prevention of certain CV diseases. The Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long term Evaluation trials have demonstrated that the early administration of zofenopril to patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significant reduction in the 6-week occurrence of major CV events in high-risk patients with anterior non-thrombolyzed myocardial infarction. The fixed combination of zofenopril-hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 30/12.5 mg/day is approved for the management of mild-to-moderate hypertension in different European countries. In clinical trials comparing zofenopril-HCTZ with each agent administered as monotherapy, combination therapy was clearly more effective in normalizing blood pressure (BP). In addition, combination therapy provided sustained and consistent BP control over the entire 24 hour dosing interval. The efficacy and safety profile of zofenopril-HCTZ highlights that this combination is a potentially useful addition to currently available therapy for patients with BP inadequately controlled by monotherapy, as well as for patients who require more rapid and intensive BP control.

A review of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, zofenopril, in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

Based on preclinical and clinical findings, zofenopril appears to be an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with high potency, significant tissue selectivity and a long duration of action. Its ancillary properties, such as antioxidant activity and cardiovascular (CV) protection, make this drug potentially suitable for the treatment, and possibly prevention, of several CV diseases. There is a large body of evidence that support a complex interaction between ACE inhibitors and CV disease. A review of the preclinical profile of zofenopril clearly suggest that such interaction can be even more complex and could involve some drug-specific properties directly involved in the definition of the overall clinical profile of zofenopril as emerged from randomised clinical trials. In particular, zofenopril combines the feature of an effective ACE inhibitor, with plasma and tissue activity, along with that of an antioxidant compound, and both these characteristics can contribute to its capacity of controlling hypertension and improving the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. The results of The Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long term Evaluation (SMILE) trials have demonstrated that the early administration of zofenopril to patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significant reduction in the 6-week occurrence of major CV events (death and congestive heart failure) in high-risk patients with anterior non-thrombolysed myocardial infarction, and this effect is enhanced in some higher-risk subgroups of patients, such as those with a history of diabetes or arterial hypertension.

Sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition induces sustained reduction of systemic oxidative stress and improves the nitric oxide pathway in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Essential hypertension is associated with enhanced LDL oxidation and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. The antioxidant status is linked to the nitric oxide (NO) pathway. Sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors inhibit oxidative stress and atherogenesis in experimental models; therefore we tested whether this beneficial antioxidant activity could be also clinically relevant in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

Plasma LDL oxidizability was investigated initially in untreated normocholesterolemic patients with moderate essential hypertension without clinically evident target organ damage (n = 96) and in control normotensive subjects (n = 46). Patients were then randomly assigned into two age- and sex-matched groups to receive the new sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor zofenopril (15 to 30 mg/d; n = 48) or enalapril (20 mg/d, n = 48). LDL oxidizability was evaluated (generation of malondialdehyde, MDA) and systemic oxidative stress was evaluated by isoprostanes (8-isoPGF2alpha). Asymmetrical dimethyl-L-arginine (ADMA), a competitive inhibitor of endothelial NO synthase, and plasma nitrite and nitrates (NOx) were also measured.

RESULTS

LDL from hypertensive subjects had enhanced susceptibility to oxidation in vitro compared with that in control subjects (P <.05). Similarly, isoprostanes were significantly increased (P <.01) in hypertensive subjects versus control subjects. After 12-week treatment, MDA levels were significantly reduced by zofenopril (P <.05) but not enalapril treatment (P = not significant). Isoprostanes were normalized after zofenopril treatment (P <.03), whereas enalapril was ineffective. After treatment with both ACE inhibitors, plasma NOx concentrations were significantly reduced (P <.05). Similarly, hypertension increased ADMA concentration compared with the normotensive state, whereas ACE inihibition elicited a significant decrease. However, the reduction of ADMA concentration was significantly higher in patients receiving sulfhydryl ACE inhibition (P <.05 vs enalapril).

CONCLUSIONS

The sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor zofenopril reduces oxidative stress and improves the NO pathway in patients with essential hypertension. If confirmed in a large multicenter clinical trial, our data suggest a possible vasculoprotective effect of the compound in retarding vascular dysfunction and atherogenesis that often develops rapidly in hypertensive patients.