Roseman JM, Go RC, Perkins LL, Barger BD, Bell DH, Goldenberg RL, DuBard MB, Huddleston JF, Sedlacek CM, Acton RT. Gestational diabetes mellitus among African-American women.
DIABETES/METABOLISM REVIEWS 1991;
7:93-104. [PMID:
1794260 DOI:
10.1002/dmr.5610070203]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with increased risk of poor outcomes for the pregnancy. It is a strong risk factor for subsequent diabetes. The epidemiology of GDM in African-American women is not well known. It has not been demonstrated that their risk factors are similar in character and weight to those among White women. There is considerable multicollinearity among GDM risk factors such as age, parity, obesity, hypertension, and family history of diabetes, and this needs to be sorted out. This review is based on the results of a nested case-control study to evaluate the frequency of, and the relationships of the known risk factors with, the onset of GDM among African-American women. All cases of GDM within a cohort of women seen at any of the county health department clinics in Jefferson County, Alabama from 1981 to 1987 were identified. The cohort represents approximately 63% of all African-American pregnancies in the county during the period. With few exceptions (5.1% based on fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 120 mg/dl), potential GDM cases (7.1%) were selected on the basis of a 2 h post 100 g carbohydrate meal screening plasma glucose measure at their second prenatal visit and again at 28-32 weeks greater than or equal to 115 mg/dl and diagnosed on the basis of the results of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) using the criteria of O'Sullivan and Mahan. Women with any prior history of diabetes (even in pregnancy), 1.6%, were excluded. The frequency of the new diagnosis of GDM among African-American women in this pregnancy in the cohort was 2.5% of pregnancies and 3.4% of women, which is similar to the values reported in the other studies. Controls were selected from women with negative screening tests who delivered after a GDM subject. The results reported in this paper reflect 358 cases (86% of all eligible GDM cases identified) and 273 controls. Cases were significantly older (28.3 vs. 21.7 years), of higher gravidity (2.7 vs. 1.9), more obese (76.7 vs. 61.7 kg), gained weight more rapidly (0.34 vs. 0.28 kg/week), had more hypertension in this pregnancy (28.2 vs. 2.6%), and there was a higher proportion with a family history of diabetes (41.3 vs. 16.5%) (p less than 0.001 for all comparisons). Because there were significant correlations among the risk factors in both cases and controls, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Collapse