Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year

Comparison between model-based RSA and an AI-based CT-RSA: an accuracy study of 30 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometry (RSA) is the current gold standard for evaluating early implant migration. CT-based migration analysis is a promising method, with fewer handling requirements compared with RSA and no need for implanted bone-markers. We aimed to evaluate agreement between a new artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT-RSA and model-based RSA (MBRSA) in measuring migration of cup and stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

30 patients with THA for primary osteoarthritis (OA) were included. RSA examinations were performed on the first postoperative day, and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. A low-dose CT scan was done at 2 weeks and 5 years. The agreement between the migration results obtained from MBRSA and AI-based CT-RSA was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Stem migration (y-translation) between 2 weeks and 5 years, for the primary outcome measure, was -0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.31 to -0.05) mm with MBRSA and -0.36 (CI -0.53 to -0.19) mm with AI-based CT-RSA. Corresponding proximal migration of the cup (y-translation) was 0.06 (CI 0.02-0.09) mm and 0.02 (CI -0.01 to 0.05) mm, respectively. The mean difference for all stem and cup comparisons was within the range of MBRSA precision. The AI-based CT-RSA showed no intra- or interobserver variability.

CONCLUSION

We found good agreement between the AI-based CT-RSA and MBRSA in measuring postoperative implant migration. AI-based CT-RSA ensures user independence and delivers consistent results.

CT-Based Micromotion Analysis After Locking Plate Fixation of AO Type C Distal Radius Fractures

Background

Volar locking plate fixation (VLPF) is the most common method for operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF). The dorsal ulnar corner (DUC) can be difficult to stabilize as the fragment is small and not exposed when using the volar approach. The purpose of this study was to study fracture fragment migration after VLPF of AO type C DRF, using a volume registration technique of paired CT scans with special focus on the DUC fragment.

Materials and Methods

This pilot study included ten patients with AO type C DRF, all operated with VLPF. The primary outcome was radiographic outcome. Postoperative and 1-year scans were compared and analyzed. Fragment migration was assessed with CT-based micromotion analysis (CTMA), a software technique used for volume registration of paired CT scans.

Results

All plates were stable over time. Two patients showed signs of screw movement (0.2-0.35 mm and 0.35- > 1 mm respectively). Postoperative reduction was maintained, and there was no fragment migration at the 1-year follow-up except for one case with increased dorsal tilt. The DUC fragment was found in 8/10 cases, fixated in 7/8 cases, and not dislocated in any case at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

The CTMA results indicate that variable-angle VLPF after AO type C DRF can yield and maintain a highly stable reduction of the fracture fragments. The DUC fragment remained stable regardless of the number of screws through the fragment. CT volume registration can be a valuable tool in the detailed assessment of fracture fragment migration following volar plate fixation of DRFs.

Dose reduction does not impact the precision of CT-based RSA in tibial implants: a diagnostic accuracy study on precision in a porcine cadaver

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for evaluation of migration of implants. CT-RSA has been shown to have precision at the level of RSA in hip, shoulder, and knee joint replacements. We aimed to assess the impact of dose reduction on precision of CT-RSA on tibial implants, comparing it with previously published data on precision of standard dose CT-RSA on tibial implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a total knee arthroplasty on a porcine knee cadaver, and subsequent CT-RSA with low effective doses (0.02 mSv). We compared the results with previously published CT-RSA data with standard (0.08 mSv) dose. The primary outcome variable was the difference in precision of the maximum total translation (MTT). Secondary variables included ratios of variances and standard deviations, and precision of peripheral point translations, center-of-mass translations, and rotations. A difference of more than 0.1 mm in precision was defined as clinically relevant. Our hypothesis was that precisions of low and standard CT-RSA doses were equal.

RESULTS

Low dose (mean 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.08) and standard dose CT-RSA (0.08, CI 0.07-0.09) achieve similar precision, with difference in precision of MTT of 0.01, CI 0.00-0.02 mm. The F-statistic (0.99, CI 0.63-1.55) and sdtest (1.05, CI 0.43-2.58) also supported this.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the precision of low dose CT-RSA for tibial implants on a porcine cadaver is equal to standard dose CT-RSA. However, these findings should be confirmed in clinical trials.

CT-based migration analysis is more precise than radiostereometric analysis for tibial implants: a phantom study on a porcine cadaver

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for migration analysis, but computed tomography analysis methods (CTRSA) have shown comparable results in other joints. We attempted to validate precision for CT compared with RSA for a tibial implant.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RSA and CT were performed on a porcine knee with a tibial implant. Marker-based RSA, model-based RSA (MBRSA), and CT scans from 2 different manufacturers were compared. CT analysis was performed by 2 raters for reliability evaluation.

RESULTS

21 double examinations for precision measurements for RSA and CT-based Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) were analysed. Mean (95% confidence interval) precision data for maximum total point motion (MTPM) using marker-based RSA was 0.45 (0.19-0.70) and 0.58 (0.20-0.96) using MBRSA (F-statistic 0.44 [95% CI 0.18-1.1], p = 0.07). Precision data for total translation (TT) for CTMA was 0.08 (0.03-0.12) for the GE scanner and 0.11 (0.04-0.19) for the Siemens scanner (F-statistic 0.37 [0.15-0.91], p = 0.03). When comparing the aforementioned precision for both RSA methods with both CTMA analyses, CTMA was more precise (p < 0.001). The same pattern was seen for other translations and migrations. Mean effective radiation doses were 0.005 mSv (RSA) (0.0048-0.0050) and 0.08 mSv (CT) (0.078-0.080) (p < 0.001). Intra- and interrater reliability were 0.79 (0.75-0.82) and 0.77 (0.72-0.82), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CTMA is more precise than RSA for migration analysis of a tibial implant, has overall good intra- and interrater reliability but higher effective radiation doses in a porcine cadaver.

Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study

Implant migration is a predictor of arthroplasty survivorship. It is crucial to monitor the migration of novel hip prostheses within premarket clinical investigations. RSA is the gold standard method, but requires calibrated radiographs using specialised equipment. A commercial computed tomography micromotion analysis solution is a promising alternative but is not yet available for use with monobloc ceramic implants. This study aimed to develop and validate a CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) method for use with ceramic implants. A phantom study was undertaken to assess accuracy and precision. A ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and 20 tantalum beads were implanted into a synthetic hip model and mounted onto a 6-degree of freedom motion stage. The hip was repeatedly scanned with a low dose CT protocol, with imposed micromovements. Data were interrogated using a semiautomated technique. The effective radiation dose for each scan was estimated to be 0.25 mSv. For the head implant, precision ranged between 0.11 and 0.28 mm for translations and 0.34°-0.42° for rotations. For the cup implant, precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.11 mm and 0.19° and 0.42°. For the head, accuracy ranged between 0.04 and 0.18 mm for translations and 0.28°-0.46° for rotations. For the cup, accuracy ranged between 0.04 and 0.08 mm and 0.17° and 0.43°. This in vitro study demonstrates that low dose CTSA of a ceramic HRA is similar in accuracy to RSA. CT is ubiquitous, and this method may be an alternative to RSA to measure prosthesis migration.

Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement In Vivo Kinematic Assessment: A Prospective Study Protocol

Total ankle prosthesis as a surgical solution in the case of end-stage osteoarthritis has seen a considerable increase in the last two decades. This study protocol arises from the need to understand the in vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing, flat tibial component total ankle replacement, evaluating the real range of motion and the reciprocal relationships between the components during normal motor tasks through the use of model-based radio-stereometric analysis (MB-RSA). In addition, pre- and post-operative evaluation of walking kinematics with inertial motion sensors, proprioception through a dedicated workstation, and clinical outcomes are discussed. We expect that based on our study protocol researchers will be able to improve future prosthetic designs and validate the setup of MB-RSA, as well as to understand "how an ankle prosthesis moves" once implanted in the patient.