A Simple Method for Treating Subgingival Class V Lesions

Comparative Analysis of the Surface Roughness of Class V Composite Restorations Using a Conventional Polishing System and Pre-contoured Cervical Matrices: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Rough surfaces of restorations have an impact on the accumulation of plaque, unaesthetic contour, and marginal adaptation, thereby affecting their functional, aesthetic, and clinical performance and the long-term stability of the restoration. Several polishing systems are currently in use for composite restorations, but information on their impact on surface roughness is limited. The present study aimed to determine the surface roughness of class V composite restorations polished using pre-contoured cervical matrices and to compare it with a conventional disc polishing system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty maxillary anterior teeth were collected and used in the study. Class V cavity preparation was done, and the cavities were restored with two types of composites (microhybrid and nanohybrid) from commercially available brands (Ivoclar and Dentsply) and finished and polished using two polishing systems (super-snap and pre-contoured cervical matrices). The evaluation of surface roughness was done using an atomic force microscope (AFM).

RESULTS

The surface roughness parameters (Ra-arithmetic mean/average line roughness and Sa-average surface roughness) of the class V cavities restored using pre-contoured cervical matrices were significantly lower for both the tested resin composites.

CONCLUSION

The surface roughness of Class V cavities restored using pre-contoured cervical matrix systems was significantly less for both microhybrid and nanohybrid composites.

Morphological and Optical Coherence Tomography Aspects of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions

Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are considered the irreversible losses of dental hard tissues at the cemento-enamel junction, in the absence of acute trauma and dental caries. The aim of this study was to highlight the presence of NCCLs in cervical areas based on specific macroscopic aspects in order to establish their clinical form, size and location and to confirm the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination in the early diagnosis of these lesions. For this study, 52 extracted teeth were used, which did not have endodontic treatments, fillings or carious lesions in the cervical area. All teeth were examined macroscopically and OCT was used to evaluate the degree of occlusal wear, the presence and clinical form of NCCLs. Most NCCLs were identified on the buccal surfaces of the premolars. The most frequently encountered clinical form was the wedge-shaped form, with a radicular location. NCCLs present most frequently in the wedge-shaped form. Teeth that presented several NCCLs were identified. The OCT examination is an adjunct method to evaluate the clinical forms of NCCL.

Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Using Three Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials in Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Split-Mouth Design In Vivo Study

Introduction

Three different tooth-colored restorative materials were evaluated and compared for postoperative sensitivity using a split-mouth design. This is a double-blinded clinical trial assessed for a one-month follow-up period in patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).

Materials and Methods

A total of 60 NCCLs in 20 participants were considered in this split-mouth design study and randomly divided into three different groups: Flowable composite (n = 20), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (n = 20), and Zirconomer® (n = 20). The restorations were evaluated for postoperative sensitivity at baseline (BL-day 0), three, seven, and 21 days using the Schiff cold air sensitivity scale. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) using a post hoc test for postoperative sensitivity and one-way Anova to analyze all the groups together at the time interval of three, seven, and 21 days.

Results

In Group 1 (flowable composites) and Group 3 (Zirconomer), a statistically significant difference in terms of reduced postoperative sensitivity was seen after three and seven days. However, a significant reduction in postoperative sensitivity was seen after three, seven, and 21 days in Group 2 (RMGIC).

Conclusion

In this study, RMGIC showed reduced postoperative sensitivity after restoring NCCLs compared to Zirconomer and flowable composites. Compared with flowable composites and Zirconomer, RMGIC showed better clinical performance in terms of less postoperative sensitivity after restoring NCCLs.

Intrasulcular Restorations of Anterior Teeth According to the BAIR Technique: Evaluation of Periodontal Parameters

Some clinical situations, such as the closure of pronounced diastemas, and the transformation of malformed, small, or peg-shaped teeth, require a rebalancing of dental proportions accompanied by a modification of the gingival contour. A traditional treatment plan can include surgical, prosthetic, and/or orthodontic treatments. In some cases, it can be considered too invasive, and not all patients are willing to undertake long therapies. To overcome these limitations, a possible solution could be the application of the Biologically Active Intrasulcular Restoration (BAIR) technique, which allows us to modify the natural emergence tooth profile using simple intrasulcular direct restorations. The aims of this paper are to investigate possible effects on gingival health, and to assess the patient satisfaction about the aesthetic intervention performed. Periodontal data were collected, and patient satisfaction was registered using the VAS questionnaire. All sites healed without complications, no adverse events were registered or reported by the patients, and no signs of periodontal morbidity were visible. The results show that the patients evaluated the final aesthetics in a positive way, and they perceived a good condition of periodontal health as well. The intervention is felt as almost painless, and patients do not report significant post-operative distress. In conclusion, the BAIR technique can provide a valid therapeutic alternative for patients for whom traditional treatments are not indicated. It is a minimally invasive intervention where both the operating times and the biologic and economic costs are reduced.

Randomized controlled clinical trial of a highly filled flowable composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 3-year results

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial assessed the 3-year clinical performance of a highly filled flowable composite and a conventional paste-type composite in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 84 NCCLs in 27 subjects were included in this split-mouth design study and randomly divided into two groups: a highly filled flowable composite Clearfil Majesty ES Flow group (ES, n = 42) and a conventional paste-type composite Majesty group (MJ, n = 42). Clearfil SE Bond was used following the manufacturer's instructions. The restorations were evaluated at baseline (BL) and 1, 2, and 3 years using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. Data were analysed by a paired chi-squared test for intergroup comparisons and the Friedman test for intragroup comparisons (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Both groups had a 97.3% retention rate at the 3-year evaluation. The acceptable scores (FDI scores 1-3) for each criterion exhibited no significant difference between the MJ and ES groups at any time point (p = 1.00). The marginal adaptation performance of ES was significantly better than that of MJ at every evaluation point (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-year clinical performance of ES in NCCLs was similar to that of MJ. When the restorations were clinically acceptable, ES showed better marginal adaptation than MJ.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Compared with conventional paste-type composites, highly filled flowable composites showed similar clinical performance and better marginal adaptation for restoring NCCLs after 3 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TRN: ChiCTR1900028484 . Date of registration: December 22, 2019, retrospectively registered.

A Simple Method for Modifying the Emergence Profile by Direct Restorations: The Biologically Active Intrasulcular Restoration Technique

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is possible to modify the natural emergence profile of the tooth using simple intrasulcular direct restorations. The shape of the intrasulcular part of the restoration will determine the design of the gingival contour.

SUMMARY

Some clinical situations, such as the closure of pronounced diastemas and the transformation of malformed, small, or peg-shaped teeth, require a rebalancing of dental proportions accompanied by a modification of the gingival contour. A traditional treatment plan might require surgical, prosthetic, and/or orthodontic treatment, but in some cases, these therapeutic options could be considered too invasive and not always the best solution. Moreover, not all patients are ready to undergo irreversible, long, and expensive procedures. To overcome these limitations and to solve all of these clinical problems in a rapid and noninvasive way, we propose a new technique that allows us to modify the natural emergence profile of the tooth using simple intrasulcular direct restorations. Using the Biologically Active Intrasulcular Restoration technique, it is possible to rebalance tooth shape and dimensions, gingival level and contour with low biological and economic costs. This method, which does not require any preparation of the dental tissues, is reversible and minimally invasive. It is applicable to patients of all ages, and results are obtained in a single appointment.