Anesthetic Efficacy of Different Ropivacaine Concentrations for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Effect of bupivacaine concentration on ultrasound-guided pericapsular group nerve block efficacy in hip surgery patients: comparative, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial

Background

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block offers effective postoperative pain relief following hip fracture surgery. This research investigated three doses of bupivacaine, all administered in the same total volume, for performing ultrasound-guided PENG blocks during hip fracture procedures.

Methods

This randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was conducted on 135 patients aged between 18 and 70 years of both sexes who underwent hip fracture surgeries. Participants were randomized into three groups (n = 45). Ultrasound-guided PENG block was applied, the groups received 20 mL of local anesthetics. The first group received 0.5% bupivacaine, the second group received 0.375% bupivacaine, and the third group received 0.25% bupivacaine. The following parameters were recorded: onset of sensory block, resting NRS after passively raising the limb by 15° half an hour post-procedure, quality of recovery score (QoR-15) at 24 h postoperative.

Results

The 0.25% bupivacaine group exhibited a longer sensory block onset than the other groups (p ≤ .05). Significant differences were demonstrated between the groups regarding the time to 1st analgesia (p = .033) and total morphine consumption (p = .025). NRS at baseline and T30 post-block did not show significant differences between the studied groups. No significant differences were detected postoperatively in rest and dynamic NRS (p ≤ .05). Patient satisfaction, QoR-15 score, and ease of spinal positioning did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Compared to 0.25% bupivacaine, PENG block with 0.5% and 0.375% bupivacaine provided a rapid onset sensory block, delayed first analgesic requirements, and reduced total morphine consumption after hip surgeries.

Protocol Registration

The trial was registered at the clinicaltrials.gov with study number (Trial ID: NCT05788458).

Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized

Introduction

The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine (with 1:200,000 adrenaline) during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Materials and methods

The study included 75 patients randomly divided into three equal groups of 25 patients each. The study variables were: onset of anesthetic action, duration of surgery and anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. A visual analog scale was used to assess pain at different time intervals. Statistical analysis revealed insignificant difference among groups in terms of volume of anesthetic solution used, quality of anesthesia, surgical difficulty and duration of surgery.

Results

The mean onset time was significantly (P < 0.001) shorter for articaine (1.14 min) than ropivacaine (2.18 min) and bupivacaine (2.33 min). However, the duration of anesthesia as well as analgesia was significantly (P < 0.001) longer for bupivacaine (483.6 min and 464 min) and ropivacaine (426.6 min and 459 min) as compared to articaine (232.8 min and 191.4 min), respectively. Also, on comparing three groups pain scores at 6th postoperative hour were significant (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Ropivacaine and bupivacaine can be safely used in patients where longer duration of surgery is anticipated.

Analgesic efficacy of the inferior alveolar nerve block for maxillofacial cancer surgery under general anaesthesia - A randomised controlled study

Background and Aims

Mandibular resection during maxillofacial cancer surgery evokes a strong sympathetic response requiring high doses of opioids. We studied the effect of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for analgesia in maxillofacial cancer surgeries.

Methods

This randomised controlled study was conducted over five months in a tertiary care cancer hospital following Institutional Ethics approval and trial registration. Fifty consenting adult patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II requiring maxillofacial cancer surgery with unilateral mandibular resection were recruited. Twenty-five patients in the study arm received ipsilateral IANB; a mock injection was given to the control group. Fentanyl requirement and haemodynamic parameters during primary tumour excision were the primary and secondary endpoints. Student's t-test was applied to compare primary and secondary endpoints.

Results

Forty-nine patients completed the study. Both arms were comparable with respect to age, gender distribution, ASA physical status and baseline heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). The mean (standard deviation) intravenous fentanyl requirement during primary tumour excision in the IANB arm was 70(32) µg, significantly lower than 183(48) µg in the control arm, P < 0.001. The mean maximum HR during primary tumour excision was 82 and 99 per minute in the IANB and control arms, respectively (P < 0.001) whereas the maximum mean BP was 88 and 101 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

IANB significantly reduced intraoperative fentanyl requirement and caused fewer haemodynamic changes during maxillofacial cancer surgery requiring unilateral mandibular excision.

Effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine of the same dose and different concentrations on analgesic effect and rehabilitation quality of patients undergoing thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Objective

To investigate the analgesic effect and rehabilitation quality of patients undergoing thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung under erector spinae plane (ESP) block with dexmedetomidine combined with the same dose and different concentrations of ropivacaine.

Methods

Seventy patients undergoing thoracoscopic wedge resection were randomly divided into groups A (n = 35) and B (n = 35). To perform ESP block, the groups were administered dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) combined with 30 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine or 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, respectively, half an hour before general anesthesia induction. We compared the onset time of anesthesia, the block level, and the duration of the block between the two groups. The number of compressions of the analgesic pump within 24 h and 48 h postoperatively and the time of the first compression were noted. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores of static and cough at 0.5 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively were noted. Furthermore, the 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-40) score was recorded at 24 h postoperatively. In addition, we noted the time taken to get out of the bed for the first time, the length of hospital stay, analgesia satisfaction, and the occurrence of related adverse reactions and complications within 48 h postoperatively.

Results

The range of ESP block was wider in Group A than in Group B (P < 0.05). Group B had a significantly shorter onset time (P < 0.05) and lower static and cough VAS scores at 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05); this was associated with significantly fewer compressions of the analgesic pump within 24 h and 48 h postoperatively and significantly more time until the first compression of the analgesic pump was required (P < 0.05). Group B was associated with significantly superior QoR-40 scores 24 h postoperatively and significantly shorter time to get out of the bed for the first time than Group A (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine combined with 0.5% ropivacaine for ESP block is better than 0.33% ropivacaine for overall analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing thoracoscopic wedge resection.

Trial registration

ChiCTR2200058114, Date of registration: 30/03/2022.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of ropivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline for implant surgery anesthesia: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

The primary indication for using long-acting anesthetics in dentistry is extensive dental procedures that require pulpal anesthesia beyond 90 min and management of postoperative pain. Ropivacaine is an amide local anesthetic that is available at various concentrations with inherent vasoconstrictive properties at low concentrations. Ropivacaine has a 75% greater margin of safety than bupivacaine. Ropivacaine can be a good alternative to bupivacaine as a local anesthetic in dental implant surgery as it provides a longer duration of both pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia after mandibular nerve block and lowers CNS and cardiovascular toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of ropivacaine and lignocaine for implant surgery anesthesia.

Methods

Fifteen patients with bilateral edentulous sites indicated for implant placement were recruited for this study. Patients aged 20–60 years of both sexes were randomly recruited. Thirty implant placements were performed in the test and control groups using ropivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline as local anesthetics, respectively.

Results

The results were analyzed statistically. The duration of anesthesia was significantly higher in the test group than in the control group. Ropivacaine was found to be superior to lignocaine in terms of the quality of anesthesia. The comparison of mean visual analog scale scores showed ropivacaine to have better anesthetic and analgesic effects than the control group.

Conclusion

Ropivacaine 0.75% provides a significantly longer duration of anesthesia than lignocaine 2% with adrenaline. Ropivacaine 0.75% decreased intraoperative and postoperative analgesia compared to lignocaine 2% with adrenaline. Hence, ropivacaine 0.75% can be used as an alternative to lignocaine in implant surgeries and other intraoral surgical procedures that require a longer duration of anesthesia and analgesia.

Twin Mixed Local Anesthesia in Third Molar Surgery - Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of injection of 2 long-acting amide local anesthetic agents - bupivacaine and ropivacaine with and without 4 mg dexamethasone in patients undergoing third molar extraction.

METHODS

A prospective randomized double blind controlled trial was conducted among 68 patients with impacted mandibular third molars. Group A and B were the control groups and received 1.8 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.75% ropivacaine hydrochloride, respectively. Group A1 and B1 were experimental groups and received modified twin mixes which were 1.8 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride + 1mL/4mg dexamethasone and 0.75% ropivacaine hydrochloride + 1 mL/4mg dexamethasone, respectively. Visual analog pain scale, mouth opening measurement and facial swelling were assessed at the time of injection and postoperative days 1, 3, and 7.

RESULTS

The mean visual analogue scale score for pain on local anesthesia injection was found to be less in both experimental groups- Group A1 (2.94) and B1 (2.41) as compared to control groups- Group A (3.59) and B (3.06). The durations of soft tissue anesthesia were higher as compared to their respective controls for both Group A1 and B1. Patients in both control groups A and B had an increased postoperative swelling, pain and trismus.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative and postoperative comfort in both the experimental groups were higher than those for control groups, thereby establishing the clinical efficacy of both modified twin mixes for use in surgical extraction of mandibular third molars.

Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine (0.75% & 0.5%) with 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) in surgical extraction of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars using IANB:a prospective, randomized, single blind study

Aim

To evaluate and compare the anaesthetic efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine with 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 Adrenaline (LWA) for surgical extraction of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars using Direct inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).

Material and methods

Total of 60 outpatients of both sex,age group of 18-40 included in a prospective, randomized, single blind, split mouth clinical study after satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group I includes 30 patients and 0.75% ropivacaine as test drug, Group II includes 30 patients and 0.5% ropivacaine as test drug. In both group control drug was LWA.Parameters measured were onset of action, duration of action, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, visual analogue scale (VAS), faces pain scale (FPS).

Result

Onset of action of 0.75%/0.5% ropivacaine (101.84 ​± ​16.92 ​secs/113.03 ​± ​12.77 ​sec) was faster than LWA (Group I-218 ​± ​21.51 ​secs, Group II-196.47 ​± ​26.27 ​secs). Duration of action of 0.75%/0.5% ropivacaine (343.55 ​± ​16.44 ​mins/319.03 ​± ​19.30 ​mins) was longer than 2% Lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline (Group I I-173 ​± ​16.86 ​mins, Group II-175.20 ​± ​18.02 ​mins). In Group I - VAS/FPS of 0.75% Ropivacaine (0.97 ​± ​0.54/1.32 ​± ​0.65) was significantly lower as compared to LWA (2.90 ​± ​0.83/3.29 ​± ​0.69). In group II-VAS/FPS of 0.5% ropivacaine (1.40 ​± ​0.72/1.47 ​± ​0.50) was lower as compared to LWA (3.40 ​± ​0.89/3.30 ​± ​0.87). Mean systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate was lower for ropivacaine (0.75%, 0.5%) than LWA except mean heart rate higher for 0.75% ropivacaine at 10 ​min after injection. Else mean heart rate lower in other time interval.

Conclusion

Ropivacaine (0.75%,0.5%) was more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) it terms of all measured parameters in study.

Comparative evaluation of ropivacaine and lidocaine as dental pulp anaesthesia

Root canal therapy linked to pulpal diseases or trauma is common in modern dental care. The 2% Lidocaine which is considered as the gold standard has some drawbacks in pulpal anaesthesia. Ropivacaine has beneficial anaesthetic effects on pulpal anaesthesia. Therefore, it is of interest to compare and evaluate the pulpal aesthetic effect using 0.5% Ropivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial consisting of 110 lower molar and premolar tooth with irreversible pulpitis cases for root canal therapy were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A: 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and Group B: 0.5% ropivacaine. The pulp sensibility tests with heat test, cold test and electric pulp test were completed. The preoperative pain score was measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale. The classical inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique was administered to all patients by a single operator. Subjects were asked for lip numbness and presence or absence of lip numbness. Postoperative pain scores were recorded during access opening and on placing files in the canal. There is no statistical difference between the groups during pre operative conditions. The mean pain scores within group A and group B is recorded. The difference was found to be statistically significant with p value ≤ 0.05. Significant difference between the mean values after and before the treatment is observed. However, there is no statistical significance between the mean pain scores between the access and pulp. The 0.5% Ropivacaine and 2% Lidocaine with epinephrine does not have any significant difference during access opening. However, 0.5% Ropivacaine groups were effective while placing the file in the canal. Thus, 0.5% Ropivacaine showed better results even though it was not statistically significant for further consideration in this context.

Can local anesthesia with ropivacaine provide postoperative analgesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars? A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the local anesthesia efficacy of ropivacaine 0.75% compared to lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine for postoperative analgesia following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial, 30 participants underwent surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars under local anesthesia using ropivacaine 0.75% or lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The pain was recorded on a visual analog scale at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The use of analgesics and the presence of adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The duration of soft tissue anesthesia in the ropivacaine group was significantly longer than that in the lidocaine group. The lidocaine group recorded significantly higher visual analog scale scores at all postoperative time intervals, except in the final 48-h period. Analgesic use was higher in the lidocaine group. Rescue medication was used by 2 patients in each group (6.7%). Significantly more postoperative bleeding was seen in the ropivacaine group.

CONCLUSION

Ropivacaine 0.75% injection before the surgical procedure may be associated with preventive analgesia for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions for pain control immediately after the extraction of lower third molars.

METHODS

Nine databases were used to identify randomized clinical trials, without restriction of language or year of publication. The "JBI Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews" was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of different anesthetics to control the pain immediately after the surgery of lower third molars, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect estimate. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

The search presented 13,739 initial results, from which 45 met the eligibility criteria and presented low to moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2% lidocaine + clonidine presented the lowest pain scores (SMD = - 1.44; - 2.72 to - 0.16) compared to 4% articaine + adrenaline, followed by 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline (SMD = - 1.36; - 2.13 to - 0.59). The certainty of evidence varied between very low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

2% lidocaine + clonidine and 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline were the anesthetics with the highest probability for pain control immediately after the surgical procedure of removing impacted lower third molars.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of an adequate anesthetic with effective pain control can contribute to a more comfortable postoperative period.

Effect of epinephrine on the distribution of ropivacaine and lidocaine using radioactive isotopes in rat maxilla and pulp

We compared the effect of epinephrine on the distribution of ropivacaine and lidocaine by using radioactive isotopes in rat maxilla and pulp. Twenty microliters of 3H-labeled 0.5% ropivacaine, 14C-labeled 2.0% lidocaine, or epinephrine-supplemented isotopes were injected into the maxilla. The radioactivity was measured and autoradiography was obtained. Epinephrine led to increase in amounts of both anesthetics in the maxilla and pulp; however, each anesthetic did so in a different manner. Addition of epinephrine to lidocaine decreased radioactivity in maxilla and pulp with time. Conversely, when ropivacaine with epinephrine was administered, radioactivity did not change until 20 min in the maxilla and reached its peak at 20 min in the pulp. Autoradiography of lidocaine faded with time even with epinephrine use; however, with ropivacaine, higher accumulation image was observed after 20 min compared to that after 2 min. When epinephrine was combined with lidocaine, the amount of lidocaine in maxilla and pulp decreased with time, similar to when lidocaine was used alone. Conversely, when ropivacaine-epinephrine combination was administered, the amount of ropivacaine remained unchanged for 20 min in the maxilla and reached its peak at 20 min in the dental pulp.

Which is the most suitable local anaesthetic when inferior nerve blocks are used for impacted mandibular third molar extraction? A network meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the different local anaesthetic agents for the extraction of impacted lower third molars. A network meta-analysis was performed of all published reports of randomized controlled clinical trials assessing efficacy (anaesthetic success and absence of need for supplementary anaesthesia during the surgical procedure) and/or safety (number of adverse events) of anaesthetic agents. Three electronic databases were searched, from their earliest records up to April 2019. Additionally, the grey literature was searched to identify further potential candidates for inclusion. Anaesthesia had to be delivered by an inferior alveolar nerve block, complemented with infiltration anaesthesia of the buccal nerve. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. This study included a total of 21 trials (2021 molars) assessing the efficacy and 19 trials (1977 molars) assessing the safety of 11 anaesthetic solutions. Seven of the studies included were considered to have a high risk of bias. The most effective local anaesthetic for the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars appeared to be 4% articaine, with significant differences when compared with 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, and 1% ropivacaine. Lidocaine is the safest local anaesthetic, although all investigated solutions can be used safely.

Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

PURPOSE

We aim to compare and evaluate the anesthetic efficacy and safety of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in lower impacted third molar (LI3M) surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We designed a prospective randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study evaluating 60 systemically healthy patients with the presence of bilateral symmetrically oriented LI3M. The sides and sequence of drug administered were randomly allocated. The primary outcome variables analyzed were hemodynamic stability, profoundness of anesthesia, and duration of postoperative analgesia. Time of onset, duration of soft tissue anesthesia, patients requiring analgesics, and their quantity for five postoperative days were recorded.

RESULTS

Early onset of anesthesia was seen in Lignocaine (68.6 ± 20.4 s) compared with Ropivacaine (104.1 ± 17.7 s) with significant differences (p = 0.001). Both the anesthetic solutions were found to be equipotent in providing profound intraoperative anesthesia. No significant difference emerged in perioperative hemodynamic stability. Ropivacaine exhibited statistically significant differences in the duration of soft tissue anesthesia (p = 0.001) and postoperative analgesia (p = 0.001). Patients requiring rescue pain medication and the number of analgesics consumed were greater on first and during five postoperative days in lignocaine when compared with that of ropivacaine with significant differences p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that 0.75% ropivacaine is effective in providing adequate anesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and better postoperative pain control with a safer cardiovascular profile in LI3M surgery. It can be an addition to the existing list of long-acting local anesthetics used for LI3M surgery.

A simple care bundle to reduce unplanned admission rate for day case pediatric circumcision

BACKGROUND

An electronic review of unplanned day case admission rates in our hospital demonstrated an average annual rate for pediatric circumcision of 2%-3% in recent years with high levels of perioperative strong opiate use. This lay above target unplanned admission rates (<2%) set out by the Royal College of Anaesthetists for day case surgery. A targeted quality improvement initiative was undertaken to improve patient flow through the pediatric day case surgery unit for elective circumcision. Among the reasons for unplanned admission, factors modifiable by the anesthetist (pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, somnolence) are significant contributors.

METHODS

A prospective audit was undertaken over a 3-month period. Our practice was compared with evidence-based analgesic and antiemetic interventions in accordance the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Perioperative strong opiate administration rates occurred in 44% of cases. Four strategic interventions were selected based on quality of evidence, ease of implementation, and low cost: selection of higher concentration local anesthetic use for penile blocks, intravenous dexamethasone, and preoperative paracetamol combined with maximum dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory.

RESULTS

The audit was duplicated a year later demonstrating a significant increase in application of these interventions with a parallel fall in strong opiate use from 44% to 9% and an unprecedented zero unplanned admission rate in our unit for 10 months in a row after implementation.

CONCLUSION

Regular scrutiny of patient electronic data helps identify high impact areas for audit and intervention. Unplanned admission in pediatric day case surgery is an area amenable to such targeted intervention.

Comparison of the spread of two different volumes of contrast medium when performing ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane injection in dog cadavers

OBJECTIVES

To compare, via CT imaging, the spread of different volumes of diluted iodinated contrast medium in the transversus abdominis muscle plane of dog cadavers.

METHODS

Prospective, randomised study. An electro stimulation or a SonoTAP needle was inserted in plane with the ultrasound beam in the fascia between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. A test dose of 1 ml of diluted contrast (30 mg/mL iohexol) was injected to confirm positioning, followed by 0 · 5 mL/kg (n=14) or 1 mL/kg (n=12) and the distribution of the fluid compared.

RESULTS

Contrast medium was identified exclusively in the transversus abdominis plane in 19 of 26 dogs. In one dog, the contrast lay between the external and internal oblique muscles and partially in three dogs. Intraperitoneal contrast was detected in 6 of 26 dogs (23%). No significant differences were found in the dorso-ventral or cranio-caudal spread or area of distribution but a significant difference was found in the transverse spread. There was an association between poor ultrasound visualisation of the tip of the needle and intraperitoneal injection.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Injection of 1 mL/kg of diluted contrast did not result in wider cranio-caudal spread in the transversus abdominis muscle plane of dog cadavers when compared with 0 · 5 mL/kg. Intraperitoneal injection is a risk and might be reduced with good needle visualisation.

Femoral nerve blockade using various concentrations of local anesthetic for knee arthroscopy in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Femoral nerve blockade (FNB) provides effective postoperative analgesia in children undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery as evidenced by their opioid-sparing effects and decreased postoperative pain scores. Increasing the local anesthetic concentration in peripheral nerve blockade for adults undergoing orthopedic surgery has been shown to be beneficial, increasing block success rate, and providing a longer duration of analgesia. The effect of increasing the concentration of local anesthetic in extremity blocks in children remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of FNB using three concentrations of local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.2%, bupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.5%) in children and adolescents undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. The primary outcome evaluated was postoperative opioid consumption before discharge. Secondary outcomes included post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital discharge times, first pain score in PACU, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-nine children and adolescents who received a FNB for arthroscopic knee surgery from January 2010 to December 2013 were included for analysis. Local anesthetic used in FNB was ropivacaine 0.2% in 116 (43%) cases, ropivacaine 0.5% in 75 (28%) cases, and bupivacaine 0.25% in 78 (29%) cases. Median postoperative opioid consumption (mg/kg intravenous morphine equivalents) in the ropivacaine 0.5% group was 0 mg/kg (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 0 mg, 0.03 mg/kg) compared to 0.02 mg/kg (IQR: 0, 0.08 mg/kg) in the ropivacaine 0.2% group and 0.01 mg/kg (IQR: 0, 0.08 mg/kg) in the bupivacaine 0.25% group (p=0.009). Median PACU time was shortest in the ropivacaine 0.5% group (47 min; IQR: 36, 68 min) compared to the ropivacaine 0.2% (58 min; IQR: 41, 77) and bupivacaine 0.25% (54 min; IQR: 35, 75 min) groups (p=0.040). Among groups, there were no significant differences in first postoperative pain scores or incidence of nausea and vomiting. No patient in any group experienced a serious adverse event.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that ropivacaine 0.5% for FNB offers superior postoperative analgesia in the form of decreased postoperative opioid consumption and earlier PACU/hospital discharge, when compared to ropivacaine 0.2% and bupivacaine 0.25% in the pediatric population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Epinephrine Affects Pharmacokinetics of Ropivacaine Infiltrated Into Palate

Pulpal anesthesia success rates for ropivacaine following maxillary infiltration anesthesia seem to be low. We investigated the hypothesis that the addition of epinephrine would affect the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine by retaining ropivacaine in the mucosa of the injected area through the time-dependent distribution of ropivacaine in the rat maxilla and serum following maxillary infiltration anesthesia using (3)H-labeled ropivacaine. We then examined the vasoactivity of ropivacaine with or without epinephrine on local peripheral blood flow. The addition of epinephrine to ropivacaine increased ropivacaine concentrations in the palatal mucosa and adjacent maxilla by more than 3 times that of plain ropivacaine at 20 minutes. By observing the autoradiogram of (3)H-ropivacaine, plain ropivacaine in the maxilla was remarkably reduced 20 minutes after injection. However, it was definitely retained in the palatal mucosa, hard palate, adjacent maxilla, and maxillary nerve after the administration with epinephrine. Ropivacaine with epinephrine significantly decreased labial blood flow. This study suggests that 10 μg/mL epinephrine added to 0.5% ropivacaine could improve anesthetic efficacy and duration for maxillary infiltration anesthesia over plain ropivacaine.

Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative analgesic effect of ropivacaine administered as main or supplemental injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients undergoing lower third molar surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The double-blind randomized study comprised 72 healthy patients. All patients received two blocks, the IANB for surgical procedure + IANB after surgery for postoperative pain control, and were divided into three groups: (1) 2 % lidocaine/epinephrine + 1 % ropivacaine, (2) 2 % lidocaine/epinephrine + saline, and (3) 1 % ropivacaine + saline. The occurrence of postoperative pain, pain intensity and analgesic requirements were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square, Fisher, and Kruskal-Wallis tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni and Tukey correction.

RESULTS

Ropivacaine was more successful than lidocaine/epinephrine in obtaining duration of postoperative analgesia, reduction of pain, and analgesic requirements whether ropivacaine was used for surgical block or administered as a supplemental injection after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ropivacaine (1 %, 2 ml) resulted in effective postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Since pain control related to third molar surgery requires the effective surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, the use of 1 % ropivacaine could be clinically relevant in a selection of appropriate pain control regimen for both surgical procedure and early postsurgical treatment.

Effect of preemptive local injection of ropivocaine with dexmedetomidine on mirror pain in rats and its mechanism

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of preemptive local injection of ropivocaine with dexmedetomidine on activation of glial cells and on the mirror pain in rats and its mechanism.

METHODS

A total of 48 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 180 g-220 g) were included in the study and randomized into 3 groups, Group S, Group R, and Group RD1. A rat model of persistent postoperative pain evoked by skin/muscle incision and retraction was established in the three groups. Before procedures and nerve extraction, Group S (n = 16) was injected 0.9% saline locally; Group R (n = 16) was injected 0.5% ropivocaine locally, and Group RD1 (n = 16) was injected 0.5% ropivocaine in combined with 1 μg dexmedetomidine locally. After the model being established in the three groups, 8 rats were used for behavior test until 28 d, and dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) of the other 8 rats were harvested on the 3rd day after surgery. Immunofluorescent and transmission electron microscopy were used to observe the activation of glial cells in DRG, and the behavior test results in the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

The results showed that mechanical pain threshold in ipsilateral hind-paws of the Group S, Group R, Group RD1 animals dropped to (3.640 ± 1.963) g, (5.827 ± 1.204) g, (7.482) ± 1.412 g at 3 d respectively; while in contralateral paws dropped to (7.100 ± 1.789) g, (17.687 ± 1.112) g, (16.213 ± 1.345) g on the 3 d respectively. Immunofluorescent showed that the glial cells were activated in bilateral side DRG after surgery in 3 groups, but ipsilateral paws expressed more active glial cells than contralateral paws. Transmission electron microscopy showed that mitochondria swelling/vacuolization and lysosomes were more obvious in ipsilateral paws than contralateral paws, but Group RD1 formula could reduce glial cells activity, mitochondria swelling/vacuolization and the amount of lysosomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Local injection of ropivocaine and/or dexmedetomidine can effectively inhibit the activation of glial cells in DRG, mitigate the pathological changes of neuron in DRG and reduce mirror image pain.

Ropivacaine: a new local anaesthetic agent in maxillofacial surgery

We have compared the anaesthetic efficacy, duration of action, pain, pulpal anaesthesia, and cardiovascular effects of 0.5% ropivacaine or 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in bilateral symmetrical impacted third molars. In a randomised single-blind trial we studied 78 healthy patients who required bilateral extraction of identical impacted lower third molars. A test dose was given to all patients with subdermal infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine 0.5 ml. A classic inferior alveolar and long buccal nerve block was created using 0.5% ropivacaine 2 ml on one side and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride 2 ml with adrenaline on the other. The time to onset and duration of action were noted. Pain, numbness of the lip and tip of the tongue, and haemodynamic changes were monitored throughout the procedure. The teeth were extracted two weeks apart. The onset of anaesthesia ranged between 2 and 3 min after the injection and lasted for more than 5h. Ropivacaine alone did not cause appreciable changes in the cardiovascular variables, but lignocaine with adrenaline caused a transient increase in arterial pressure and heart rate 2 min after injection. We conclude the 0.5% ropivacaine alone does not affect the cardiovascular system and has more beneficial effects than 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline. These findings may be useful for oral and maxillofacial surgeons who are looking for a local anaesthetic with minimal cardiovascular risk and without a vasoconstrictor to provide regional anaesthesia for long procedures.

The Effectiveness of Ropivacaine and Mepivacaine in the Postoperative Pain after Third Lower Molar Surgery

AIM

To compare the efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine with 3% mepivacaine for pain control in the first 24 hours after surgical removal of lower third molars, using a quantitative measurement such as VAS. The secondary objective involved rescue analgesia.

METHODS

Forty-five patients, 21 females and 24 males, mean age 23,2 ± 3 years, underwent surgical removal of third molars in two separate sessions. A split-mouth design was chosen, so each patient underwent both the first and second surgeries, having for each extraction a different anesthetic. The second extraction was carried out 1 month later. Parameters evaluated were: onset of anesthesia, duration of surgery, lip numbness, timing of pain appearance and first analgesic intake.

RESULTS

No significant differences about onset of anesthesia, duration of surgical procedures, and timing of first analgesic intake were found. Lower lip numbness, on the other hand, was more prolonged after using ropivacaine (p < 0.0001) and the onset of postoperative pain was more delayed after anesthesia with ropivacaine (p=0.0048). Pain scores at 1 and 2 hours after surgery were 3.5 ± 2.0 and 4.1 ± 1.3 after injection of mepivacaine, and 2.7 ± 2.2 and 2.9 ± 2.4 after ropivacaine (p value =0.006 for both time points). No significant differences in pain score were recorded between the two anesthetics at 12 and 24 hours post surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of ropivacaine, the discomfort caused by prolonged lip numbness is counterbalanced by less postoperative discomfort after surgery. In addition, when compared with other long-acting anesthetics, ropivacaine ensures a safer anesthetic profile for medically complex patients.

Avaliação dos efeitos da ropivacaína sobre a reatividade vascular em artéria mesentérica de rato

INTRODUÇÃO: A ropivacaína (ROPI) é um anestésico local de longa duração de ação, introduzido mais recentemente em Medicina, mas ainda não disponível para uso odontológico em tubetes. Estudos clínicos e com animais confirmam que a ROPI é um anestésico local eficaz e que possui um efeito vasoconstritor intrínseco.OBJETIVO: Avaliar os efeitos da ROPI sobre a reatividade vascular em artéria mesentérica isolada de rato, além de comparar esse efeito ao da lidocaína (LIDO) e avaliar o possível envolvimento do endotélio vascular na resposta induzida pela ROPI em anel de artéria mesentérica isolada de rato.MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Foram utilizados 14 ratos Wistar machos (250-300g). Os animais foram eutanasiados e, através de uma incisão no abdome do animal, foi retirada a artéria mesentérica. Desta artéria, foram obtidos anéis (1-2 mm), que foram mantidos em cubas contendo 10 mL de solução nutritiva de Tyrode mantida a 37 °C e gaseificada com carbogênio. Para o registro das contrações isométricas, cada anel foi suspenso, por linhas de algodão, a um transdutor de força conectado a um sistema de aquisição.RESULTADO: Tanto a LIDO como a ROPI não apresentaram efeito vasoconstritor sobre o tônus basal de anéis com endotélio funcional. Porém, quando os anéis foram pré-contraídos com fenilefrina, ambas as drogas foram capazes de induzir vasorrelaxamentos dependentes da concentração (Emáx = 31,7 ± 3,3%; n = 6, para a LIDO; Emáx = 69 ± 8%; n = 6, para a ROPI), que não foram alterados após a remoção do endotélio (Emáx = 28,7 ± 1,3%; n = 7, para a LIDO; Emáx = 58,8 ± 5,9%; n = 6, para a ROPI). Em anéis sem endotélio funcional, porém, pré-contraídos com solução despolarizante de Tyrode (KCl a 80 mM), o efeito vasorrelaxante induzido pela LIDO não apresentou alterações significativas (Emáx = 29 ± 3%; n = 7). Porém, o efeito da ROPI foi reduzido significativamente neste protocolo, bem como na presença de 1 mM de tetraetilamônio (TEA) (Emáx = 21,2 ± 5,1%; n = 7 e Emáx = 17,4 ± 3,7; n = 4, respectivamente).CONCLUSÃO: A ROPI produz efeito vasorrelaxante em artéria mesentérica superior isolada de rato pré-contraída com fenilefrina, sendo este independente da participação do endotélio. Este efeito parece envolver os canais para K+ na célula muscular lisa vascular.

Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars

INTRODUCTION

Ropivacaine belongs to pipecoloxylidide group of local anesthetics. There are reports supporting the use of ropivacaine as a long acting local anesthetic in oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures, with variable data on the concentration that is clinically suitable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomized double-blind study protocol was undertaken to assess the efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % ropivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. A total of 60 procedures were performed, of which thirty patients received 0.5 % and thirty received 0.75 % concentration of the study drug.

RESULTS

All the patients in both the study groups reported subjective numbness of lip and tongue. The time of onset was longer for 0.5 % ropivacaine when compared to 0.75 % solution. 90 % of the study patients in 0.5 % ropivacaine group reported pain corresponding to VAS ≥3 during bone guttering and 93.3 % patients reported pain corresponding to VAS >4 during tooth elevation. None of the patients in 0.75 % ropivacaine group reported VAS >3 at any stage of the surgical procedure. The duration of soft tissue anesthesia recorded with 0.75 % ropivacaine was average 287.57 ± 42.0 min.

CONCLUSION

0.75 % ropivacaine was found suitable for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Pharmacology of local anesthetics used in oral surgery

This article provides a comprehensive review of the pharmacology of local anesthetics as a class, and provides details of the individual drugs available in dental cartridges. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors are presented for healthy adult and pediatric patients, and for patients with cardiovascular system impairments. Various complications and reasons for failure of local anesthesia effectiveness are discussed, and current and future trends in local anesthesia are presented to provide an overview of current research in local anesthesia.

The local pharmacokinetics of ³H-ropivacaine and ¹⁴C-lidocaine after maxillary infiltration anesthesia in rats

The effects of infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine on the dental pulp are considered to be weak. This may be partly associated with its permeation into the oral tissue. With the objective of investigating the local pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and lidocaine following infiltration anesthesia, we injected (3)H-ropivacaine or (14)C-lidocaine to the palatal mucosa in rats, measured distributions of radioactivity in the maxilla, and compared the local pharmacokinetics of these agents. The animals were sacrificed at various times and the maxillas were removed. The palatal mucosa and maxillary nerve were resected, and the bone was divided into 6 portions. We measured radioactivity in each tissue and calculated the level of each local anesthetic (n  =  8). Lidocaine diffused to the surrounding tissue immediately after the injection, whereas ropivacaine tended to remain in the palatal mucosa for a longer period. Lidocaine showed a higher affinity for the maxillary bone than ropivacaine. There was a correlation between the distribution level of local anesthetics in the maxillary bone and that in the maxillary nerve. The lower-level effects of infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine on the dental pulp may be because ropivacaine has a high affinity for soft tissue, and its transfer to bone is slight.

Comparison of ropivacaine and articaine with epinephrine for infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry - a randomized study

AIM

To compare the efficacy, onset time and duration of maxillary infiltration anaesthesia with 0.5% plain ropivacaine or 4% articaine with epinephrine 1 : 100 000 and to determine their possible influence on cardiovascular parameters.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty volunteers received 1.8 mL of the anaesthetic for buccal infiltration anaesthesia of maxillary central and lateral incisors and canine teeth without caries, restorations or signs of pulpitis. The efficacy, onset time and duration of pulp anaesthesia were assessed with an electric pulp tester. The duration of numbness of the upper lip was also monitored. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and after administration of the solutions.

RESULTS

The efficacy of anaesthesia of lateral and central incisors was 100% for both anaesthetics. There were insignificant differences in effectiveness of canine pulp anaesthesia. The mean onset time was significantly (P < 0.05) shorter for ropivacaine (2.22 min) when compared with articaine (4.08 min). The duration of action and soft tissue anaesthesia were also significantly (P < 0.05) longer for ropivacaine (79.2 and 264 min) when compared with articaine (63.7 and 195.2 min, respectively). Ropivacaine caused significant (P < 0.05) increases in blood pressure and heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Ropivacaine (0.5%) achieved effective and long duration of uninflamed pulp and soft tissue anaesthesia. Ropivacaine could be useful for long-lasting operative procedures without the need for a vasoconstrictor.

Low-dose ropivacaine or levobupivacaine walking spinal anesthesia in ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to compare the equipotent doses of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for walk-out criteria and the characteristics of spinal anesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy surgery.

METHODS

Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed. Adult patients were randomly allocated to receive 5 mg 0.5% ropivacaine plus 25 μg fentanyl (group RF, n = 25) or 3.75 mg 0.75% levobupivacaine plus 25 μg fentanyl (group LF, n = 25). Each solution was hypobaric, and the same volume, 3 ml, was administered. Sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamic changes, side effects, number of patients having ability to stand and walk at the end of the operation, time to first analgesic requirement, time to urination, time to getting out of bed (ambulation), and time to home discharge were determined.

RESULTS

Sensory block onset time and time to reach the T6 dermatome were significantly shorter in group LF, whereas time to the two-segment regression and time to first analgesic requirement were significantly shorter in group RF. All patients in group LF were Bromage 0. Time to home discharge was shorter in group LF, but this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that both local anesthetics can be used in walking spinal technique. Levobupivacaine may be an alternative local anesthetic for walking spinal anesthesia as it provides minimum motor block and a long duration of postoperative analgesia, even if its use is not associated with a shorter home discharge time.

[Evaluation of anesthetic effect of ropivacaine in surgery of chronic periapical lessions]

INTRODUCTION

Ropivacaine is used in orthopedcs, gyneacology, surgery, ophtamology, whereas experience about its usage in dentistry is still limited. The aim of this research was to compare the anesthetic effect between local anesthetics ropivacaine and bupivacaine, in surgical disposals of chronical periapical lessions in maxilla.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included the patients that had indications for surgical removal of chronical periapical lessions at one of the frontal teeth of upper jaw. The total total number of examinees was 60, and they were devided in two groups. Ropivacaine chloride (0.75%) was used as a local anesthetic in one group (Naropin 0.75%; Astra Zeneca), and in the other one bupivacaine chloride (0.5%) (Vexelit 0.5%; Zdravlje). The authors applied 1.8 ml of block anesthesia for the n. infraorbitalis (intra-oral approach) as well as 0.2 ml of the local anesthetic from the palatine side for the final branches of N. nasopalatinus in order to observe the following anesthetic parameters. (I) Beginning of anesthesia was followed by the appearence of upper lip numbness. (II) Pain rating scale according to Sisk was used for the objective measurement of the anesthesia quality. (III) The pain intensity during the intervention was measured by visual analogous scale, on which the patient denoted the intensity of pain he had felt during the intervention. (IV) Duration of anesthetic effect--it is followed by soft tissues numbness.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After the ropivacaine application anesthesia effect started in 1.57 min. and after the usage of bupivacaine in 1.67 min. The mean duration of soft tissue numbness after the application of ropivacaine was 321 minutes. Bupivacaine had a shorter anesthetic effect--296.5 minutes. The quality of anesthesia after the usage of ropivacaine was assessed by the surgeons with average mark--1.76. Interventions in which this anesthetic was used were performed with minimal pain and without additional anesthesia. The quality of anesthesia after the usage of bupivacaine (3.03) was statistically much worse (p < 0.01) in comparison to ropivacaine. In visual analogous scale where patients denoted the intensity of pain during the intervention with ropivacaine the marked average value was 30.1 mm while the average value with usage of bupivacaine was 41.7 mm. The patients from the control group, where bupivacaine was used, had much stronger pain, statistically significant (p < 0.05) in comparison to the group where ropivacaine was used. Our results show that the quality of anesthesia that was attained with 0.5% bupivacaine was much worse than the quality of anesthesia after the application of 0.75% ropivacaine.

CONCLUSION

Ropivacaine has a potential to replace bupivacaine completely in cases when there is the indication for its usage in oral surgery (longlasting intervention, interventions followed by intensive postoperational pain, nerve blockade).

Long-acting local anesthetics and perioperative pain management

Although the use of long-acting local anesthetics has become a useful therapeutic approach for managing peri- and postoperative pain, recent evidence reveals unexpected outcomes. This article reviews the clinical use of long-acting local anesthetics, presents current clinical research findings, and makes recommendations for their use.

Maxillary infiltration anaesthesia by ropivacaine for upper third molar surgery

The main purpose of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and haemodynamic effects of ropivacaine for infiltration anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgical removal of upper third molars. The safety profile of ropivacaine was also studied by investigating the maximal venous plasma concentration of ropivacaine and the reactivity to ropivacaine of isolated human infraorbital arteries. Ropivacaine in concentrations of 0.5, 0.75 and 1% achieved dose-dependent parameters of maxillary infiltration aneasthesia, clinically relevant in concentrations 0.75 and 1%. Postoperative needs for analgesics were observed in 67-100% of patients. Haemodynamic parameters were stable during surgery with significant changes occuring 10 min after surgery. After maxillary infiltration of 2.0 ml 1% ropivacaine, the maximum venous plasma concentration (Cmax) was 82+/-15 microg/l. On isolated human infraorbital artery, ropivacaine (10(-4)M) induced endothelium-independent contraction. This study suggests that 0.75 and 1% ropivacaine offers adequate and safe intraoperative analgesia but not successful postoperative pain control for the surgical removal of upper third molars.