Adenovirus infection within stromal cells in a pediatric small bowel allograft

Approach to infection and disease due to adenoviruses in solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenoviruses are an important cause of morbidity and mortality of solid organ transplant patients and remain a clinical challenge with regard to diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we provide an approach to identification and classification of adenovirus infection and disease, highlight risk factors, and outline management options for adenovirus disease in solid organ transplant patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Additional clinical data and pathologic findings of adenovirus disease in different organs and transplant recipients are known. Unlike hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, adenovirus blood PCR surveillance and preemptive therapy is not supported in solid organ transplantation. Strategies for management of adenovirus disease continue to evolve with newer antivirals, such as brincidofovir and adjunctive immunotherapies, but more studies are needed to support their use.

SUMMARY

Distinguishing between adenovirus infection and disease is an important aspect in adenovirus management as treatment is warranted only in symptomatic solid organ transplant patients. Supportive care and decreasing immunosuppression remain the mainstays of management. Cidofovir remains the antiviral of choice for severe or disseminated disease. Given its significant nephrotoxic effect, administration of probenecid and isotonic saline precidofovir and postcidofovir infusion is recommended.

Adenovirus

Adenoviruses are a highly prevalent infection that can cause a range of clinical syndromes in immunocompromised patients, ranging from localized disease of the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, or urinary tract to disseminated disease. Adenovirus infections may develop in this unique population as the result of primary infection or reactivation of latent virus. Disease can be potentially progressive with high rates of mortality in patients with pneumonia and disseminated disease. Fortunately, cidofovir and its lipid ester, brincidofovir, appear to be effective for the treatment of adenovirus, although neither is specifically approved for this indication. Adenovirus should always be considered when immunocompromised patients present with any clinical syndrome that could be compatible with adenoviral infection. Once disease is suspected, cultures or molecular testing of appropriate specimens should be obtained and blood should be sent for adenovirus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) whenever adenovirus is suspected. Monitoring of quantitative viral loads in blood is helpful in predicting response to therapy with a significant drop (>1 log) associated with a higher probability of clinical response.

Adenovirus disease in six small bowel, kidney and heart transplant recipients; pathology and clinical outcome

Adenoviruses are emerging as important viral pathogens in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, impacting morbidity, graft survival, and even mortality. The risk seems to be highest in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients as well as heart, lung, and small bowel transplant recipients. Most of the adenovirus diseases develop in the first 6 months after transplantation, particularly in pediatric patients. Among abdominal organ recipients, small bowel grafts are most frequently affected, presumably due to the presence of a virus reservoir in the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Management of these infections may be difficult and includes the reduction of immunosuppression, whenever possible, combined with antiviral therapy, if necessary. Therefore, an awareness of the pathology associated with such infections is important in order to allow early detection and specific treatment. We reviewed six transplant recipients (small bowel, kidney, and heart) with adenovirus graft involvement from two institutions. We sought to compare the diagnostic morphology and the clinical and laboratory findings. The histopathologic features of an adenovirus infection of the renal graft and one native kidney in a heart transplant recipient included a vaguely granulomatous mixed inflammatory infiltrate associated with rare cells showing a cytopathic effect (smudgy nuclei). A lymphocytic infiltrate, simulating T cell rejection, with admixture of eosinophils was also seen. In the small bowel grafts, there was a focal mixed inflammatory infiltrate with associated necrosis in addition to cytopathic effects. In the heart, allograft adenovirus infection was silent with no evidence of inflammatory changes. Immunohistochemical stain for adenovirus was positive in all grafts and in one native kidney. All patients were subsequently cleared of adenovirus infection, as evidenced by follow-up biopsies, with no loss of the grafts. Adenovirus infection can involve allografts as well as native organs in solid organ transplant recipients. Infection is associated with variable necrosis and acute inflammation, in addition to a rejection-like infiltrate. Hematuria in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients may be associated with adenovirus nephritis and clinically silent graft involvement. Prompt diagnosis (aided by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and serology), with specific treatment, can prevent graft loss.

Small-Bowel Allograft Biopsies in the Management of Small-Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplant Recipients: Histopathologic Review and Clinical Correlations

Context.—Intestinal transplant has become a standard treatment option in the management of patients with irreversible intestinal failure. The histologic evaluation of small-bowel allograft biopsy specimens plays a central role in assessing the integrity of the graft. It is essential for the management of acute cellular and chronic rejection; detection of infections, particularly with respect to specific viruses (cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus); and immunosuppression-related lymphoproliferative disease.

Objective.—To provide a comprehensive review of the literature and illustrate key histologic findings in small-bowel biopsy specimen evaluation of patients with small-bowel or multivisceral transplants.

Data Sources.—Literature review using PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and data obtained from national and international transplant registries in addition to case material at Columbia University, Presbyterian Hospital, and Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.

Conclusions.—Key to the success of small-bowel transplantation and multivisceral transplantation are the close monitoring and appropriate clinical management of patients in the posttransplant period, requiring coordinated input from all members of the transplant team with the integration of clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic parameters.