Safety and Effectiveness of Debulking for the Treatment of Infrainguinal Peripheral Artery Disease. Data From the Recording Courses of vascular Diseases Registry in 2910 Patients

We investigated the safety and efficacy of debulking infrainguinal lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing endovascular revascularization (EVR) as part of the RECording Courses of vascular Diseases (RECCORD) registry. Patient and lesion specific characteristics, including the lesion complexity score (LCS) were analyzed. The primary endpoint encompassed: (i) clinical improvement in Rutherford categories, (ii) index limb re-interventions, and (iii) major amputations during follow-up. The secondary endpoint included the need for bail-out stenting. Overall, 2910 patients were analyzed; 2552 without and 358 with debulking-assisted EVR. Patients were 72 (interquartile range (IQR) = 15) years old and 1027 (35.3%) had diabetes. Overall complication rates were similarly low in the debulking vs the non-debulking group (4.7 vs 3.2%, P = .18). However, peripheral embolizations rates were low but more frequent with debulking vs. non-debulking procedures (3.9 vs 1.1%, P < .001). After adjustment for clinical and lesion-specific parameters, including LCS, no differences were noted for the primary endpoint (odds ration (OR) = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.69-1.41, P = .94). Bail-out stenting was less frequently performed in patients with debulking-assisted EVR (OR = 0.5, 95%CI = 0.38-0.65, P < .0001). Debulking-assisted EVR is currently used in ∼12% of EVR with infrainguinal lesions and is associated with lower bail-out stent rates but higher peripheral embolization rates; no differences were found regarding index limb re-intervention and amputation rates.

Safety and effectiveness of the phoenix atherectomy device for endovascular treatment of common femoral and popliteal arteries: Results of the EN-MOBILE trial

Background: This study aimed to assess the peri- and postprocedural outcomes of atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of the common femoral (CFA) and popliteal arteries. Methods: Phoenix atherectomy was used for the treatment of 73 and 53 de novo CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, in 122 consecutive patients. Safety endpoints encompassed perforation and peripheral embolization. Postprocedural endpoints included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and clinical success (an improvement of ⩾ 2 Rutherford category [RC]). In addition, 531 patients treated for popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion without atherectomy were used as a comparator group. Results: Procedural success (residual stenosis < 30% after treatment) was 99.2%. The need for bail-out stenting was 2 (2.7%) and 3 (5.7%) in CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively. Only one (1.4%) embolization occurred in the CFA, which was treated by catheter aspiration. No perforations occurred. After 1.50 (IQR = 1.17-2.20) years, CD-TLR occurred in seven (9.2%) and six (14.6%) patients with CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, whereas clinical success was achieved in 62 (91.2%) and 31 (75.6%), respectively. Patients treated with atherectomy and DCB in the popliteal artery after matching for baseline RC, lesion calcification, length, and the presence of chronic total occlusion, exhibited higher freedom from CD-TLR compared to the nondebulking group (HR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Atherectomy can be used safely and is associated with low rates of bail-out stenting in CFA and popliteal arteries. CD-TLR and clinical success rates are clinically acceptable. In addition, for the popliteal artery, atherectomy combined with DCB demonstrates lower CD-TLR rates compared to a DCB alone strategy. (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016708).

Periprocedural Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy-Assisted Balloon Angioplasty in Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions: The ISO-POP Trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of calcified popliteal artery lesions represents an ongoing challenge for vascular specialists. Biomechanical forces of external compression, torsion and elongation that occur with locomotion in the popliteal segment can lead to stent fractures and occlusions. The aim of our study was to assess the procedural success rate of atherectomy in combination with balloon angioplasty for isolated calcified popliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, 62 patients with isolated atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery underwent endovascular treatment by use of rotational atherectomy (Phoenix, Philips USA, (subgroup A) or Jetstream, Boston USA, (subgroup B), atherectomy systems) and additional balloon angioplasty in two vascular centers. The primary outcome measures were: 1. periprocedural clinical and technical success (<30% residual stenosis and no need for bailout stenting due to flow-limiting dissection) and 2. postprocedural increase in the ankle brachial index of more than 0.1.

RESULTS

The overall rate of bailout stenting was 4.8%, whereas the procedural success rate was 98.4%. The rate of procedural complications included 3.7% and 5.7% peripheral embolizations in the subgroups A and B, respectively, and no vessel perforations were noted. All embolizations were successfully treated by catheter aspiration or capture in the pre-treatment placed filter system. In addition, 1 (3.7%) pseudoaneurysm in the groin was reported in subgroup A and treated by surgical means. Median ABI of the affected limbs improved from 0.55 (0.2) to 0.70 (0.2) in subgroup A and from 0.50 (0.2) to 0.95 (0.1) in subgroup B (DABI of 0.15 versus 0.45, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of rotational atherectomy and balloon angioplasty in the popliteal artery showed reproducible outcomes in 2 centers, with low incidence of complications and low rates of bail-out stenting. These findings may contribute to more liberal use of such devices especially in segments with high risk for stent factures and occlusions.

The RANGER II superficial femoral artery trial: 1-year results of the long lesion cohort

Background:

The objective of the RANGER II SFA long lesion cohort analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ranger drug-coated balloon (DCB) in patients with lesion lengths greater than 100 mm.

Methods:

Patients from the RANGER II SFA randomized controlled trial and long balloon sub-study were included in the long lesion cohort if their baseline lesion measurement was > 100 mm and if they had been treated with a RANGER DCB. Patients had symptomatic lower limb peripheral artery disease and Rutherford classification 2–4 symptomatology. The endpoints of interest included the 12-month target lesion primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (MAEs).Additional patient outcomes including changes in Rutherford classification were also evaluated.

Results:

A total of 129 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the long lesion cohort. Mean lesion length was 144.5 ± 31.7 mm. Seventy-five lesions had Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) grades 3 (33.3%, 43/129) and 4 (24.8%, 32/129). The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the primary patency rate at 12 months was 88.0%. The rate of freedom from MAEs at 12 months was 95.1% (117/123; 95% CI: 89.7%, 98.2%); all MAEs were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (4.9%, 6/123). The 12-month mortality rate was 2.4% (3/125).

Conclusions:

Patients with lesions > 100 mm treated with Ranger DCBs demonstrated excellent 1-year safety and efficacy results, comparable to those of the overall RANGER II SFA randomized clinical trial. This suggests that the Ranger DCB can provide consistent results regardless of lesion length. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03064126)

[Innovations in the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease]

Die Kooperation von Medizinern, Ingenieuren und anderen Naturwissenschaften bringt weiterhin effektive Produkte auf den Markt, die dazu geeignet sind, die Dominanz der endovaskulären Techniken im Bereich der peripheren arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit (pAVK) weiter auszubauen. Begleitend werden zunehmend bildgebende Verfahren weiterentwickelt oder neu entwickelt, die helfen können, die Strahlenbelastung für Patient und Anwender trotz wachsender Zahlen strahlenbasierter Therapieverfahren deutlich zu reduzieren. Mittlerweile haben wir ein Materialportfolio an der Hand, das es erlaubt, jede Gefäßregion endovaskulär zu behandeln. Auf der anderen Seite dürfte das endovaskuläre Leistungsgefüge nicht flächendeckend homogen gestaltet sein und die jeweilige Ergebnisqualität dann für die Chirurgie sprechen. In diesem Übersichtsartikel sollen neue Materialien und neuere Ergebnisse vorgestellt werden, die den Bereich der endovaskulären Behandlung der pAVK in allen Gefäßsegmenten mit beeinflussen dürften.

Safety and effectiveness of Phoenix atherectomy for endovascular treatment in calcified common femoral artery lesions

Background: Traditionally endarterectomy has been considered as the gold standard technique for the treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the procedural safety and mid-term outcomes of minimal invasive Phoenix atherectomy for the treatment of CFA lesions. Patients and methods: Phoenix atherectomy was used for treatment of 61 consecutive, moderately to heavily calcified CFA lesions in 56 patients. Lesions were classified based on the CFA occlusive disease classification (Type I, II&III lesions). Primary endpoints were technical, procedural, and clinical success rate. Safety endpoints (vessel perforation, peripheral embolization) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) were also assessed. Results: Of 61 CFA lesions, 58 (95%) exhibited at least moderate/severe calcification (PACSS3 in 38 (62%) and PACSS4 in 20 (33%) cases). Type III lesions were present in 30 (49%), type I/II lesions in 31 (51%) cases. Technical and procedural success was achieved in 30 (49%) and all 61 (100%) lesions, respectively with low complication rates (0% perforation, 2% embolization). Adjunctive treatment after atherectomy was performed using drug-coated balloon (DCB) in 35 (57%) and bail-out stenting in 6 (10%) cases. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 4 (7%) cases during a mean follow-up duration of 11±7months. All patients exhibited clinical improvement at follow-up, showing mean Rutherford category reduction from 3.7±1.1 to 1.5±1.1 (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Phoenix device can be used for the effective endovascular treatment of CFA lesions, due to its reasonable safety profile and mid-term results.

Distal retrieval of dislodged and migrated guidewires after retrograde puncture of the deep femoral and dorsal pedal artery. A case series

We report on retrograde retrieval of the soft end of dislodged guidewires during complex interventions. Interventionalists may consider this as an option for the endovascular management of this complication if an antegrade retrieval is not possible or fails.

Excimer laser atherectomy in complex peripheral artery disease: a prospective European registry

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate performance, effectiveness, and safety of excimer laser atherectomy for the treatment of complex lower limb artery disease in a real-world setting.

METHODS

In our prospective, multicenter registry, consecutive patients with complex lower limb lesions underwent excimer laser atherectomy with optional standard balloon angioplasty, paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty, and bailout stenting. Primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes were device performance of the excimer laser system, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), peri-procedural complications, and amputation-free survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were enrolled at 14 European centers (mean lesion length 109±103 mm, total occlusions 56.8% [167 of 294 lesions], CLI 47.3% [132 of 279 patients]. Adjuvant balloon angioplasty was conducted in 283 (96.3%), and complementary stent implantation in 98 patients (33.3%). Technical success was achieved in 95.3% of patients. Increasing lesion length was associated with decreased laser atherectomy performance (odds ratio [OR] per 10 mm: 0.94 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 0.99], P=0.01). A total of 66 patients (22.4%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Freedom from TLR was 83.5% (95% CI: 74.9 to 92.1) at 12 months. Chronic total occlusions were associated with more TLR (OR 5.03 [95% CI: 1.01 to 25.1], P=0.049). Amputation -free survival in patients with CLI was 93.1% (95% CI: 83.9 to 100).

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser atherectomy substantially contributed to technical success of endovascular treatment of complex infra-inguinal lesions. Freedom from 12-month TLR was reasonable.

Long-term outcome upon treatment of calcified lesions of the lower limb using scoring angioplasty balloon (AngioSculpt™)

AIMS

In peripheral artery disease (PAD), endovascular treatment success of heavily calcified lesions is often compromised by a number of vascular complications, such as recoils, dissections and need for target vessel re-interventions. The increasing use of scoring balloon techniques has raised the hope for better periprocedural outcomes; however, the knowledge regarding the actual benefits of the scoring balloon technique in comparison to standard therapy is still limited. Thus, the aim of the current study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of scoring balloon angioplasty in a real-life patients' collective with PAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 425 patients with moderate to severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions received interventional treatment between 2011 and 2018 at the single center; 230 received a treatment with a scoring balloon (AngioSculpt™), and 195 received a plain procedure without AngioSculpt™. Key questions of this analysis were: (1) whether AngioSculpt™ can be used as a safe and effective stand-alone treatment in heavily calcified lesions in a 24-month follow-up, as well as (2) whether target lesion preparation with scoring balloon bears additional benefits to standard treatment (PTA ± stent implantation). In terms of freedom from target lesion revascularization there were no significant differences between AngioSculpt™ and standard procedure (82.3% vs. 78.1%, P > 0.05). Vessel preparation with balloon angioplasty had no additional effects on survival and amputation rates in comparison to standard treatment without AngioSculpt™ (P > 0.05). The deployment of a scoring balloon did not reduce the subsequent need for additional stent implantations (32.6%, and 32.3%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lesion preparation with AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon represents a safe and effective tool in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions. In this retrospective analysis, AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon angioplasty did not significantly improve vessel patency- both when used as an adjunctive in preparation for stenting and as stand-alone treatment. A prospective study is needed to further investigate the scoring balloon treatment options.