Long-term rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder in patients after the first clinical atrial fibrillation episode. Towards an individualized management

Optimizing Anticoagulation Management in Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the Guidelines. How and for Whom?

ABSTRACT

Anticoagulation therapy (AT) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment for thromboembolic event prevention. The AF burden, however, is of predictive relevance and may be used as a foundation for therapeutic decisions in individuals with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Remote rhythm monitoring devices can provide early detection of the arrhythmia, long-term rhythm monitoring, and the development of anticoagulation strategies based on AF recurrence profile and the total burden of the arrhythmia. Although the exact thromboembolic cut-off value for the AF burden has not yet been established, targeted anticoagulation treatments in the new oral anticoagulants era have shown encouraging outcomes. The combined evaluation of AF burden and patient thromboembolic risk reported in some studies supports the concept of tailored anticoagulation management, at least in a subset of patients with low AF burden and intermediate thromboembolic risk, for whom the guidelines recommend that AT should be individualized based on net clinical benefit and patient values and preferences. Although it is still premature to derive firm conclusions or algorithms diverging from the current guidelines, the combination of a patient's AF burden, thromboembolic risk, and bleeding risk can lead in the future to an individualized management of patients with a congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74 years sex category (female) (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc) score of 1 (2 for female patients), in whom the guidelines do not strictly recommend long-term AT. In this study, we provide an algorithm regarding the individualized implementation of anticoagulation strategies in AF in different patients' thromboembolic risk profiles, based on the available data on the so far tailored anticoagulation strategies in AF.

Anticoagulation in Deep Venous Thrombosis: Current Trends in the Era of Non- Vitamin K Antagonists Oral Anticoagulants

:

Anticoagulation therapy is the cornerstone of treatment in acute vein thrombosis (DVT) and it aims to reduce symptoms, thrombus extension, DVT recurrences, and mortality. The treatment for DVT depends on its anatomical extent, among other factors. Anticoagulation therapy for proximal DVT is clearly recommended (at least for 3 months), while AT for isolated distal DVT should be considered, especially in the presence of high thromboembolic risk factors. The optimal anticoagulant and duration of therapy are determined by the clinical assessment, taking into account the thromboembolic and bleeding risk in each patient in a case-by-case decision making. Non-Vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were a revolution in the anticoagulation management of DVT. Nowadays, NOACs are considered as first-line therapy in the anticoagulation therapy for DVT and are recommended as the preferred anticoagulant agents by most scientific societies. NOACs offer a simple route of administration (oral agents), a rapid onset-offset of their action along with a good efficacy and safety profile in comparison with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs). However, there are issues about their efficacy and safety profile in specific populations with high thromboembolic and bleeding risks, such as renal failure patients, active-cancer patients, and pregnant women, in which VKAs and heparins were the standard care of treatment. Since the available data are promising for the use of NOACs in end-stage chronic kidney disease and cancer patients, several ongoing randomized trials are currently trying to solve that issues and give evidence about the safety and efficacy of NOACs in these populations.