Soundarajan S, Rajasekar A. Comparative evaluation of combined efficacy of methylene blue mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (a-PDT) using 660 nm diode laser versus Erbium-chromium-yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser as an adjunct to scaling and root planing on clinical parameters in supportive periodontal therapy: A randomized split-mouth trial.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2022;
39:102971. [PMID:
35738551 DOI:
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102971]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM
The aim of this study was to evaluate combined efficacy of methylene blue mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (a-PDT) using 660 nm diode laser versus Er, Cr: YSGG laser as an adjunct to scaling and root planing on improving the Probing depth (PD), Clinical attachment level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI).clinical parameters in Supportive periodontal therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
In this split-mouth, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we compared a-PDT versus Er,Cr:YSGG as an adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP) with SRP alone in Supportive periodontal therapy. A total of 36 subjected were enrolled. In each patient, two quadrants constituted the control group (Group I - Scaling and root planing SRP alone), one site in other quadrant constituted the test group 1 (Group II - SRP followed by application of Er, Cr: YSGG laser), and another site in different quadrant constituted the test group 2 (Group III - SRP followed by antimicrobial Photodynamic therapy using diode laser). The diode laser was operated at a peak power of 70 mW using a 0.6 mm diameter fiber-optic tip. Each site was irradiated with a power density of 28 mW/cm2, for 10 s, thus delivering a total energy of 16.72 J/cm2 per tooth. Whereas, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser's parameters were set to 1 W of power, 10% air, and 15% water. The same procedure was repeated at 1st, 2nd and 3rd week for both the laser therapies. Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Probing depth (PD,) and Clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured by a single examiner at baseline and 3 months follow up. Inter group analysis of the parameters were done using One-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison was carried out by Tukey's post hoc test. Intra group analysis was performed using Students's paired t test. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences between participants for clinical parameters at baseline. PI, GI PD, and CAL significantly improved at 3 months follow up compared to baseline in both the study groups (Group II - SRP + Er,Cr:YSGG, Group III - SRP + a-PDT) with P < 0.05. Adjunctive use of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with SRP showed better clinical outcomes than a-PDT with SRP.
CONCLUSION
Nonsurgical periodontal therapy of chronic periodontitis using Er, Cr: YSGG, and a-PDT as an adjunct to SRP was significantly more effective than SRP alone in reducing PD, CAL, GI, and PI at 3 months follow up. Adjunctive use of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with SRP showed better clinical outcomes than a-PDT with SRP. However, the long-term positive benefits of the laser therapies are yet unknown and more research with longer follow-ups are required.
Collapse