1
|
De Gasperi A, Petrò L, Cerutti E. Liver Transplantation and the Older Adults Candidate: Perioperative Considerations. Clin Geriatr Med 2025; 41:65-81. [PMID: 39551542 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Pioneered by Thomas Starzl in the early 1970s, liver transplant (LT) is nowadays often considered a final intervention and standard of care to cure many forms of acute and chronic end-stage liver diseases. Started in recipients younger than 60 years old, LT indications are now much broader, and at least, one-fifth of the candidates are older than 65 years. Problems associated with ageing and frailty in LT recipients and their impact on the entire perioperative course are discussed according to a modern anesthesiological perspective and the anesthesiologist covering the role of the perioperative (transplant) physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Petrò
- ANRI1 - Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; ASST Papa Giovanni XXII, Piazza MSO 1, 24100 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cerutti
- Anestesia e Rianimazione dei Trapianti e Chirurgia Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti", Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
L'Acqua C, Frassanito L, Kusamura S, Valenza F. Single center experience with Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) during cytoreductive surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2025; 5:4. [PMID: 39844207 PMCID: PMC11752816 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00225-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla L'Acqua
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano Frassanito
- Department of Scienza dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Valenza
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin H, Baker JW, Meister K, Lak KL, Martin Del Campo SE, Smith A, Needleman B, Nadzam G, Ying LD, Varban O, Reyes AM, Breckenbridge J, Tabone L, Gentles C, Echeverri C, Jones SB, Gould J, Vosburg W, Jones DB, Edwards M, Nimeri A, Kindel T, Petrick A. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024; 20:895-909. [PMID: 39097472 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical care pathways help guide and provide structure to clinicians and providers to improve healthcare delivery and quality. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (QIPS) of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) has previously published care pathways for the performance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and pre-operative care of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). OBJECTIVE This current RYGB care pathway was created to address intraoperative care, defined as care occurring on the day of surgery from the preoperative holding area, through the operating room, and into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS PubMed queries were performed from January 2001 to December 2019 and reviewed according to Level of Evidence regarding specific key questions developed by the committee. RESULTS Evidence-based recommendations are made for care of patients undergoing RYGB including the pre-operative holding area, intra-operative management and performance of RYGB, and concurrent procedures. CONCLUSIONS This document may provide guidance based on recent evidence to bariatric surgeons and providers for the intra-operative care for minimally invasive RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Lin
- Department of Surgery, Signature Healthcare, Brockton, Massachusetts.
| | - John W Baker
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Kathleen L Lak
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - April Smith
- Department of Pharmacy, Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Geoffrey Nadzam
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lee D Ying
- Department of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Oliver Varban
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Angel Manuel Reyes
- Department of General Surgery, St. Michael Medical Center, Silverdale, Washington
| | - Jamie Breckenbridge
- Department of General Surgery, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, Virginia
| | - Lawrence Tabone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Charmaine Gentles
- Department of Surgery, Northshore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York
| | | | - Stephanie B Jones
- Department of Anesthesiology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Jon Gould
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Wesley Vosburg
- Department of Surgery, Grand Strand Medical Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | - Daniel B Jones
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | | | - Abdelrahman Nimeri
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tammy Kindel
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Anthony Petrick
- Department of Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Gasperi A, Petrò L, Amici O, Scaffidi I, Molinari P, Barbaglio C, Cibelli E, Penzo B, Roselli E, Brunetti A, Neganov M, Giacomoni A, Aseni P, Guffanti E. Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist. World J Crit Care Med 2024; 13:92751. [PMID: 38855273 PMCID: PMC11155507 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea De Gasperi
- Former Head, Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Laura Petrò
- AR1, Ospedale Papa Giovanni 23, Bergamo 24100, Italy
| | - Ombretta Amici
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Ilenia Scaffidi
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Pietro Molinari
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Caterina Barbaglio
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Eva Cibelli
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Beatrice Penzo
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Elena Roselli
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Andrea Brunetti
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Maxim Neganov
- Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva Generale, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giacomoni
- Chirurgia Oncologica Miniinvasiva, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Paolo Aseni
- Dipartimento di Medicina d’Urgenza ed Emergenza, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda ASST GOM Niguarda, Milano 20163, MI, Italy
| | - Elena Guffanti
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Urhan G, Demirel İ, Deniz A, Aksu A, Altun AY, Bolat E, Beştaş A, Altuntaş G. Comparison of Dynamic Measures in Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy of Patients with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2024; 34:1600-1607. [PMID: 38512646 PMCID: PMC11031432 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07154-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity increases the risk of morbidity and mortality during surgical procedures. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a new concept for perioperative fluid management that has been shown to improve patient prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the role of the Pleth Variability Index (PVI), systolic pressure variation (SPV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) in maintaining tissue perfusion and renal function during GDFT management in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred ten patients were enrolled in our prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, biochemical parameters, the amount of crystalloid and colloid fluid administered intraoperatively, and the technique of goal-directed fluid management used were recorded. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: PVI (n = 70), PPV (n = 70), and SPV (n = 70), according to the technique of goal-directed fluid management. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, time of return of bowel movement, and hospital stay duration were recorded. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference between the number of crystalloids administered in all three groups. However, the amount of colloid administered was statistically significantly lower in the SPV group than in the PVI group, and there was no significant difference in the other groups. Statistically, there was no significant difference between the groups in plasma lactate, blood urea, and creatinine levels. CONCLUSION In LSG, dynamic measurement techniques such as PVI, SPV, and PPV can be used in patients with morbid obesity without causing intraoperative and postoperative complications. PVI may be preferred over other invasive methods because it is noninvasive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gökhan Urhan
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Elazig, Turkey
| | - İsmail Demirel
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Deniz
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Aksu
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey
| | - Aysun Yıldız Altun
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey
| | - Esef Bolat
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey.
| | - Azize Beştaş
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey
| | - Gülsüm Altuntaş
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Medicine Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Esper GW, Anil U, Cavaleri SG, Furgiuele DL, Zaretsky J, Konda SR, Egol KA. Preoperative Workup of Operative Hip Fracture Patients: A Survey. HSS J 2024; 20:237-244. [PMID: 39281995 PMCID: PMC11393624 DOI: 10.1177/15563316231158546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Abstract
Background: There may be disagreement among stakeholders on the need for preoperative cardiac screening for elderly hip fracture patients. Purpose: We sought to assess preoperative workup perceptions among physicians for hip fracture patients across specialties, specifically considering a patient's cardiovascular risk. Methods: A case-based survey was distributed to 50 physicians in each of the 4 departments involved in preoperative patient care: orthopedic surgery (OS), anesthesiology (A), cardiology (C), and hospital medicine (HM). The survey asked about which clinical presentations required a cardiology consult, as well as about further preoperative imaging and laboratory work. Single score intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare agreement. Results: Of the 200 surveys sent out, 33 responses (16.5% response rate) were received. Between all specialties, there was 72% agreement about preoperative cardiology consult need (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.063 or poor) and 71% agreement about preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) need (ICC = 0.188 or poor). Within each specialty (A, C, HM, OS) ICCs measuring agreement for the need for cardiology consult were 0.812 (good), 0.561 (moderate), 0.457 (poor), and 0.414 (poor), respectively, and for the need for preoperative TTE were 0.852 (good), 0.441 (poor), 0.848 (good), and 0.188 (poor), respectively. Common preoperative testing requested included complete blood count, basic metabolic panel in all cases, and electrocardiogram with troponins if perioperative acute coronary syndrome symptoms were present. Conclusion: This survey suggests that there may be varying levels of agreement within specialties and poor agreement between specialties on the need for cardiology consultation and preoperative imaging for hip fracture patients. This suggests the need for established, reliable preoperative workup protocols with input from different specialties to streamline preoperative care for patients before hip fracture surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett W Esper
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Utkarsh Anil
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - David L Furgiuele
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonah Zaretsky
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sanjit R Konda
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Richmond Hill, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth A Egol
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Richmond Hill, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berger-Estilita J, Marcolino I, Radtke FM. Patient-centered precision care in anaesthesia - the PC-square (PC) 2 approach. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37:163-170. [PMID: 38284262 PMCID: PMC10911256 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review navigates the landscape of precision anaesthesia, emphasising tailored and individualized approaches to anaesthetic administration. The aim is to elucidate precision medicine principles, applications, and potential advancements in anaesthesia. The review focuses on the current state, challenges, and transformative opportunities in precision anaesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS The review explores evidence supporting precision anaesthesia, drawing insights from neuroscientific fields. It probes the correlation between high-dose intraoperative opioids and increased postoperative consumption, highlighting how precision anaesthesia, especially through initiatives like Safe Brain Initiative (SBI), could address these issues. The SBI represents multidisciplinary collaboration in perioperative care. SBI fosters effective communication among surgical teams, anaesthesiologists, and other medical professionals. SUMMARY Precision anaesthesia tailors care to individual patients, incorporating genomic insights, personalised drug regimens, and advanced monitoring techniques. From EEG to cerebral/somatic oximetry, these methods enhance precision. Standardised reporting, patient-reported outcomes, and continuous quality improvement, alongside initiatives like SBI, contribute to improved patient outcomes. Precision anaesthesia, underpinned by collaborative programs, emerges as a promising avenue for enhancing perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Berger-Estilita
- Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Salemspital, Hirslanden Medical Group
- Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Isabel Marcolino
- Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Spital Limmattal, Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Finn M. Radtke
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital of Nykøbing Falster, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Douglas IS, Elwan MH, Najarro M, Romagnoli S. Dynamic monitoring tools for patients admitted to the emergency department with circulatory failure: narrative review with panel-based recommendations. Eur J Emerg Med 2024; 31:98-107. [PMID: 38364037 PMCID: PMC11232941 DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000001103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Intravenous fluid therapy is commonly administered in the emergency department (ED). Despite the deleterious potential of over- and under-resuscitation, professional society guidelines continue to recommend administering a fixed volume of fluid in initial resuscitation. Predicting whether a specific patient will respond to fluid therapy remains one of the most important, but challenging questions that ED clinicians face in clinical practice. Surrogate parameters (i.e. blood pressure and heart rate), are widely used in usual care to estimate changes in stroke volume (SV). Due to their inadequacy in estimating SV, noninvasive techniques (e.g. bioreactance, echocardiography, noninvasive finger cuff technology), have been proposed as a more accurate and readily deployable method for assessing flow and preload responsiveness. Dynamic monitoring systems based on cardiac preload challenge and assessment of SV, by using noninvasive and continuous methods, provide more accurate, feasible, efficient, and reasonably accurate strategy for prediction of fluid responsiveness than static measurements. In this article, we aimed to analyze the different methods currently available for dynamic monitoring of preload responsiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivor S. Douglas
- Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver Colorado, USA
| | - Mohammed H. Elwan
- Emergency Department, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, UK
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Marta Najarro
- Emergency Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Stefano Romagnoli
- Health Science Department, Section of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Catarci M, Tritapepe L, Rondinelli MB, Beverina I, Agostini V, Buscemi F, Amisano M, Attinà GM, Baldini G, Cerutti A, Moretti C, Procacci R, D’Antico S, Errigo G, Baldazzi G, Ardu M, Benedetti M, Abete R, Azzaro R, Delrio P, Lucentini V, Mazzini P, Tessitore L, Giuffrida AC, Gizzi C, Borghi F, Ciano P, Carli S, Iovino S, Manca PC, Manzini P, De Franciscis S, Murgi E, Patrizi F, Di Marzo M, Serafini R, Olana S, Ficari F, Garulli G, Trambaiolo P, Volpato E, Montemurro LA, Coppola L, Pace U, Rega D, Armellino MF, Basti M, Bottino V, Ciaccio G, Luridiana G, Marini P, Nardacchione F, De Angelis V, Giarratano A, Ostuni A, Fiorin F, Scatizzi M. Patient blood management in major digestive surgery: Recommendations from the Italian multisociety (ACOI, SIAARTI, SIdEM, and SIMTI) modified Delphi consensus conference. G Chir 2024; 44:e41. [DOI: 10.1097/ia9.0000000000000041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Patient blood management (PBM) is defined as the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain a surgical patient’s hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve the outcomes. PBM is able to reduce mortality up to 68%, reoperation up to 43%, readmission up to 43%, composite morbidity up to 41%, infection rate up to 80%, average length of stay by 16%–33%, transfusion from 10% to 95%, and costs from 10% to 84% after major surgery. It should be noticed, however, that the process of PBM implementation is still in its infancy, and that its potential to improve perioperative outcomes could be strictly linked to the degree of adherence/compliance to the whole program, with decoupling and noncompliance being significant factors for failure. Therefore, the steering committees of four major Italian scientific societies, representing general surgeons, anesthesiologists and transfusion medicine specialists (Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani; Società Italiana di Anestesia, Analgesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva; Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare; Società Italiana di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia), organized a joint modified Delphi consensus conference on PBM in the field of major digestive surgery (upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, and hepato-biliopancreatic resections), whose results and recommendations are herein presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Ivo Beverina
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy
| | - Vanessa Agostini
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Marco Amisano
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Grazia Maria Attinà
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Baldini
- Department of Health Science, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Florence, Prehabilitation Clinic AOU-Careggi Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cerutti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | | | | | - Sergio D’Antico
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Città della Salute e Della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Roberta Abete
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale del Mare, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosa Azzaro
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale” IRCSS, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale” IRCSS, Naples, Italy
| | - Valeria Lucentini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Mazzini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Loretta Tessitore
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Gizzi
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Paolo Ciano
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Iovino
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Carmelo Manca
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Paola Manzini
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Silvia De Franciscis
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale” IRCSS, Naples, Italy
| | - Emilia Murgi
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Patrizi
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Di Marzo
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale” IRCSS, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Serafini
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Soraya Olana
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Ficari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, IBD Unit, AOU-Careggi Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Trambaiolo
- Cardiology Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Volpato
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Great Metropolitan Niguarda Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Coppola
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, ASL, Rome, Italy
| | - Ugo Pace
- Abdominal Robotic Surgery Unit, Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS “Fondazione G. Pascale,” Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Rega
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione G. Pascale” IRCSS, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Basti
- General Surgery Unit, S. Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bottino
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonino Giarratano
- President SIAARTI, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AOU Policlinico P. Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angelo Ostuni
- President SIdEM, Transfusion Medicine Unit, AOU Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiorin
- President SIMTI, Transfusion Medicine Unit, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- President ACOI, General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
De Gasperi A, Petrò L, Cerutti E. Liver Transplantation and the Elderly Candidate: Perioperative Considerations. Anesthesiol Clin 2023; 41:595-611. [PMID: 37516497 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
Pioneered by Thomas Starzl in the early 1970s, liver transplant (LT) is nowadays often considered a final intervention and standard of care to cure many forms of acute and chronic end-stage liver diseases. Started in recipients younger than 60 years old, LT indications are now much broader, and at least, one-fifth of the candidates are older than 65 years. Problems associated with ageing and frailty in LT recipients and their impact on the entire perioperative course are discussed according to a modern anesthesiological perspective and the anesthesiologist covering the role of the perioperative (transplant) physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Petrò
- ANRI1 - Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; ASST Papa Giovanni XXII, Piazza MSO 1, 24100 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cerutti
- Anestesia e Rianimazione dei Trapianti e Chirurgia Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti", Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang YF, Liu LL, Huang MJ, Ma ZM, Huo WW, Zhu YJ, Liu H, Peng K, Ji FH. Effect of rScO 2-Guided Blood Pressure Management on Postoperative Complications in Elderly Patients After Major Noncardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Gen Med 2023; 16:3789-3796. [PMID: 37649853 PMCID: PMC10464896 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s426245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative complications are common after major surgical procedures, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) reflects cerebral and global perfusion, and thus it can be used to guide hemodynamic management. We aim to explore the effect of rScO2-guided blood pressure management strategy on postoperative major complications in older adults who undergo major noncardiac surgery. Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial includes a total of 400 elderly patients receiving major noncardiac surgery and general anesthesia. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of two blood pressure management groups: a standard care group (targeting mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg or within 20% of baseline value), and a rScO2-guided group (absolute value of rScO2 >60% or decrease in rScO2 <10% of baseline). The primary outcome is the composite outcome of major complications (including infectious, respiratory, neurologic, cardiovascular, renal, thromboembolic gastrointestinal, and surgical complications) and deaths within the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the individual components of the primary outcome by day 7 after surgery and 30-day mortality. Data will be analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Discussion This study will provide evidence for improving postoperative outcomes using the rScO2-guided blood pressure management among older adults who undergo major noncardiac surgery. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: ChiCTR2200060816).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-fan Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin-Lin Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming-jie Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zheng-min Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-wen Huo
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ya-juan Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Ke Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fu-Hai Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gricourt Y, Prin Derre C, Demattei C, Bertran S, Louart B, Muller L, Simon N, Lefrant JY, Cuvillon P, Jaber S, Roger C. A Pilot Study Assessing a Closed-Loop System for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Abdominal Surgery Patients. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091409. [PMID: 36143194 PMCID: PMC9505637 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This prospective multicentre pilot study of patients scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery aimed to validate the fluid challenge (FC) proposed by the closed-loop (CL) system via anaesthesiologist assessment. Methods: This was a phase II trial consisting of two inclusion stages (SIMON method). Each FC (250 mL saline solution for 10 min) proposed by the CL was systematically validated by the anaesthesiologist who could either confirm or refuse the FC or give FC without the CL system. A ≥ 95% agreement between the CL and the anaesthesiologist was considered acceptable. Results: The study was interrupted after interim analysis of the first 19 patients (10 men, median age = 61 years, median body mass index = 26 kg/m2). The anaesthesiologists accepted 165/205 (80%) of fluid boluses proposed by the CL. Median cardiac index (CI) was 2.9 (interquartile: IQ (2.7; 3.4) L/min/m2) and the median coefficient of variation (CV) for CI was 13% (10; 17). Fifteen out of nineteen patients (79%) had a mean CI > 2.5 L/min/m2 or spent > 85% surgery time with pulse pressure variation < 13%. No adverse events related to the CL were reported. Conclusion: In this study of patients scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery, the agreement between CL and anaesthesiologist for giving fluid challenge was 80%, suggesting that CL cannot replace the physician but could help in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yann Gricourt
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Camille Prin Derre
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Christophe Demattei
- Laboratoire de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie Clinique, Santé Publique Innovation et Méthodologie (BESPIM), Pôle Pharmacie, Santé Publique, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Sébastien Bertran
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
- Polyclinique Grand Sud, 350 Avenue Saint-André de Codols, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - Benjamin Louart
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Laurent Muller
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Natacha Simon
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Jean-Yves Lefrant
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-4-66-68-30-50; Fax: +33-4-66-68-38-41
| | - Philippe Cuvillon
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Samir Jaber
- Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation B St Eloi Hospital, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - Claire Roger
- IMAGINE, UR-UM 107, University of Montpellier, Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, 30900 Nîmes, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marinari G, Foletto M, Nagliati C, Navarra G, Borrelli V, Bruni V, Fantola G, Moroni R, Tritapepe L, Monzani R, Sanna D, Carron M, Cataldo R. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: an Italian consensus statement. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7171-7186. [PMID: 35953683 PMCID: PMC9485178 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) is an approach developed to improve outcomes in obese surgical patients. Unfortunately, it is not evenly implemented in Italy. The Italian Society for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases and the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care joined in drafting an official statement on ERABS. Methods To assess the effectiveness and safety of ERABS and to develop evidence-based recommendations with regard to pre-, intra-, and post-operative care for obese patients undergoing ERABS, a 13-member expert task force of surgeons and anesthesiologists from Italian certified IFSO center of excellence in bariatric surgery was established and a review of English-language papers conducted. Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Grade Definitions were used to grade the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations, respectively. The supporting evidence and recommendations were reviewed and discussed by the entire group at meetings to achieve a final consensus. Results Compared to the conventional approach, ERABS reduces the length of hospital stay and does not heighten the risk of major post-operative complications, re-operations, and hospital re-admissions, nor does it increase the overall surgical costs. A total of 25 recommendations were proposed, covering pre-operative evaluation and care (7 items), intra-operative management (1 item, 11 sub-items), and post-operative care and discharge (6 items). Conclusions ERABS is an effective and safe approach. The recommendations allow the proper management of obese patients undergoing ERABS for a better outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marinari
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirto Foletto
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Nagliati
- Department of Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Gorizia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Navarra
- Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Bruni
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fantola
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, ARNAS, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Roberto Moroni
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Policlinico Sassarese, Sassari, Italy
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Monzani
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University Milan, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Sanna
- Emergency Department, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ARNAS, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michele Carron
- Department of Medicine-DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padua, Italy.
| | - Rita Cataldo
- Unit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lorente JV, Reguant F, Arnau A, Borderas M, Prieto JC, Torrallardona J, Carrasco L, Solano P, Pérez I, Farré C, Jiménez I, Ripollés-Melchor J, Monge MI, Bosch J. Effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy guided by non-invasive monitoring on perioperative complications in elderly hip fracture patients within an enhanced recovery pathway. Perioper Med (Lond) 2022; 11:46. [PMID: 35945605 PMCID: PMC9364538 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-022-00277-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients. However, there is little evidence of its efficacy in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effect of GDHT guided by non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring on perioperative complications in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods Patients > 64 years undergoing hip fracture surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) were enrolled in this single-centre, non-randomized, intervention study with a historical control group and 12-month follow-up. Exclusion criteria were patients with pathological fractures, traffic-related fractures and refractures. Control group (CG) patients received standard care treatment. Intervention group (IG) patients received a GDHT protocol based on achieving an optimal stroke volume, in addition to a systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg and an individualized cardiac index. No changes were made between groups in the ERP during the study period. Primary outcome was percentage of patients who developed intraoperative haemodynamic instability. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative arrhythmias, postoperative complications (cardiovascular, respiratory, infectious and renal complications), administered fluids, vasopressor requirements, perioperative transfusion, length of hospital stay, readmission and 1-year survival. Results In total, 551 patients (CG=272; IG=279) were included. Intraoperative haemodynamic instability was lower in the IG (37.5% vs 28.0%; p=0.017). GDHT patients had fewer postoperative cardiovascular (18.8% vs 7.2%; p < 0.001), respiratory (15.1% vs 3.6%; p<0.001) and infectious complications (21% vs 3.9%; p<0.001) but not renal (12.1% vs 33.7%; p<0.001). IG patients had less vasopressor requirements (25.5% vs 39.7%; p<0.001) and received less fluids [2.600 ml (IQR 1700 to 2700) vs 850 ml (IQR 750 to 1050); p=0.001] than control group. Fewer patients required transfusion in GDHT group (73.5% vs 44.4%; p<0.001). For IG patients, median length of hospital stay was shorter [11 days (IQR 8 to 16) vs 8 days; (IQR 6 to 11) p < 0.001] and 1-year survival higher [73.4% (95%CI 67.7 to 78.3 vs 83.8% (95%CI 78.8 to 87.7) p<0.003]. Conclusions The use of GDHT decreases intraoperative complications and postoperative cardiovascular, respiratory and infectious but not postoperative renal complications. This strategy was associated with a shorter hospital stay and increased 1-year survival. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02479321. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-022-00277-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan V Lorente
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department, Juan Ramón Jiménez Hospital, Ronda Norte s/n, 21590, Huelva, Spain. .,School of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Catalonia (UIC), Barcelona, Spain. .,Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Group of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Francesca Reguant
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Catalonia (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Anna Arnau
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Catalonia (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.,Central Catalonia Chronicity Research Group (C3RG), Research and Innovation Unit, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain.,Centre d'Estudis Sanitaris i Socials, (CESS), Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Marcelo Borderas
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Juan C Prieto
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Jordi Torrallardona
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Laura Carrasco
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Patricia Solano
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Isabel Pérez
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Carla Farré
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | - Ignacio Jiménez
- Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Group of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain.,Clinical Management Anesthesiology Unit, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, Virgen del Rocio Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Javier Ripollés-Melchor
- Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Group of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain.,Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel I Monge
- Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Group of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section, Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain.,Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario SAS, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Joan Bosch
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Catalonia (UIC), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang Y, Huang W, Han J, Tian Y, Wang C, Li L. A comparison of ClearSight noninvasive cardiac output and pulmonary artery bolus thermodilution cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients. Perioper Med (Lond) 2022; 11:24. [PMID: 35676705 PMCID: PMC9178897 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-022-00248-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ClearSight system measures blood pressure non-invasively and determines cardiac output by analyzing the continuous pressure waveform. We performed a multi-center clinical study in China to test the equivalence of cardiac output measured with the ClearSight system (CSCO) and cardiac output measured with the pulmonary artery catheter bolus thermodilution (TDCO) method. METHODS We included adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in three Chinese hospitals and measured TDCO and CSCO simultaneously after induction of anesthesia. Hemodynamic stability was required during measurement of TDCO and CSCO. At least four TDCO determinations were performed. The corresponding CSCO was determined as the average over a 30-s period following the injection of each bolus. A data pair for the comparison included the average of three or four accepted TDCO values and the average of the matching CSCO values. Main outcomes included Bland-Altman analysis of bias and standard deviation (SD) and the percentage error (PE). RESULTS One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled, and 122 TDCO and CSCO data pairs were available for analysis. Ninety-five (75.4%) data pairs were collected in hemodynamically stable conditions, mean (SD) CSCO was 4.21 (0.78) l/min, and mean TDCO was 3.90 (0.67) l/min. Bias was 0.32 (0.51) l/min, and PE was 25.2%. Analyzing all 122 data pairs resulted in a mean CSCO of 4.19 (0.82) l/min and a mean TDCO of 3.83 (0.71) l/min. Resulting bias was 0.36 (0.53) l/min, and PE was 26.4%. CONCLUSIONS CSCO and TDCO agreed with a low systematic bias. Besides, mean PE was well below the pre-defined 30%. Hemodynamic stability only had a small impact on the analysis. We conclude that CSCO is equivalent to TDCO in cardiac surgery patients. The trial was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03807622 ; January 17, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuefu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Weiqin Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiange Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chest Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
| | - Yu Tian
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chunrong Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lihuan Li
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Giglio M, Biancofiore G, Corriero A, Romagnoli S, Tritapepe L, Brienza N, Puntillo F. Perioperative goal-directed therapy and postoperative complications in different kind of surgical procedures: an updated meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE (ONLINE) 2021; 1:26. [PMID: 37386648 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-021-00026-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goal-directed therapy (GDT) aims to assure tissue perfusion, by optimizing doses and timing of fluids, inotropes, and vasopressors, through monitoring of cardiac output and other basic hemodynamic parameters. Several meta-analyses confirm that GDT can reduce postoperative complications. However, all recent evidences focused on high-risk patients and on major abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVES The aim of the present meta-analysis is to investigate the effect of GDT on postoperative complications (defined as number of patients with a least one postoperative complication) in different kind of surgical procedures. DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on perioperative GDT in adult surgical patients were included. The primary outcome measure was complications, defined as number of patients with at least one postoperative complication. A subgroup-analysis was performed considering the kind of surgery: major abdominal (including also major vascular), only vascular, only orthopedic surgery. and so on. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Meta-analytic techniques (analysis software RevMan, version 5.3.5, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England, UK) were used to combine studies using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS In 52 RCTs, 6325 patients were enrolled. Of these, 3162 were randomized to perioperative GDT and 3153 were randomized to control. In the overall population, 2836 patients developed at least one complication: 1278 (40%) were randomized to perioperative GDT, and 1558 (49%) were randomized to control. Pooled OR was 0.60 and 95% CI was 0.49-0.72. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the main result. The analysis enrolling major abdominal patients showed a significant result (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87, p = 0.0007, 31 RCTs, 4203 patients), both in high- and low-risk patients. A significant effect was observed in those RCTs enrolling exclusively orthopedic procedures (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.80, p = 0.002, 7 RCTs, 650 patients. Also neurosurgical procedures seemed to benefit from GDT (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.78, p = 0.008, 2 RCTs, 208 patients). In both major abdominal and orthopedic surgery, a strategy adopting fluids and inotropes yielded significant results. The total volume of fluid was not significantly different between the GDT and the control group. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS The present meta-analysis, within the limits of the existing data, the clinical and statistical heterogeneity, suggests that GDT can reduce postoperative complication rate. Moreover, the beneficial effect of GDT on postoperative morbidity is significant on major abdominal, orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures. Several well-designed RCTs are needed to further explore the effect of GDT in different kind of surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariateresa Giglio
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Policlinico di Bari, Piazza G. Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | | | - Alberto Corriero
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Romagnoli
- Anesthesia, Intensive Care Unit and Pain Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Nicola Brienza
- Direttore UOC Anestesia e Rianimazione, AO San Camillo Forlanini-Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Filomena Puntillo
- Direttore UOC Anestesia e Rianimazione, AO San Camillo Forlanini-Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Intraoperative Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Normotensive Dogs under Isoflurane Anaesthesia. Vet Sci 2021; 8:vetsci8020026. [PMID: 33670144 PMCID: PMC7916826 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8020026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of fluid responsiveness (FR) to a fluid challenge (FC) in normotensive dogs under anaesthesia. The accuracy of pulse pressure variation (PPV), systolic pressure variation (SPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and plethysmographic variability index (PVI) for predicting FR was also evaluated. Dogs were anaesthetised with methadone, propofol, and inhaled isoflurane in oxygen, under volume-controlled mechanical ventilation. FC was performed by the administration of 5 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate within 5 min. Cardiac index (CI; L/min/m2), PPV, (%), SVV (%), SPV (%), and PVI (%) were registered before and after FC. Data were analysed with ANOVA and ROC tests (p < 0.05). Fluid responsiveness was defined as 15% increase in CI. Eighty dogs completed the study. Fifty (62.5%) were responders and 30 (37.5%) were nonresponders. The PPV, PVI, SPV, and SVV cut-off values (AUC, p) for discriminating responders from nonresponders were PPV >13.8% (0.979, <0.001), PVI >14% (0.956, <0.001), SPV >4.1% (0.793, <0.001), and SVV >14.7% (0.729, <0.001), respectively. Up to 62.5% of normotensive dogs under inhalant anaesthesia may be fluid responders. PPV and PVI have better diagnostic accuracy to predict FR, compared to SPV and SVV.
Collapse
|
18
|
Cavaliere F, Allegri M, Apan A, Calderini E, Carassiti M, Cohen E, Coluzzi F, Di Marco P, Langeron O, Rossi M, Spieth P, Turnbull D. A year in review in Minerva Anestesiologica 2019. Anesthesia, analgesia, and perioperative medicine. Minerva Anestesiol 2021; 86:225-239. [PMID: 32118384 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14424-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Cavaliere
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, A. Gemelli University Polyclinic, IRCCS and Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Massimo Allegri
- Unità Operativa Terapia del Dolore della Colonna e dello Sportivo, Policlinic of Monza, Monza, Italy.,Italian Pain Group, Milan, Italy
| | - Alparslan Apan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Giresun, Giresun, Turkey
| | - Edoardo Calderini
- Unit of Women-Child Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital, Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Carassiti
- Unit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Edmond Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Flaminia Coluzzi
- Unit of Anesthesia, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Di Marco
- Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anesthesiologic, and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Langeron
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Marco Rossi
- Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter Spieth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - David Turnbull
- Department of Anaesthetics and Neuro Critical Care, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chok AY, Oliver A, Rasheed S, Tan EJ, Kelly ME, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aziz O, Baker RP, Bali M, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Beynon J, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chew MH, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Corr A, Coscia M, Coyne PE, Creavin B, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espin-Basany E, Evans MD, Fearnhead NS, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Frizelle FA, Gallego MA, Garcia-Granero E, Garcia-Sabrido JL, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glynn R, Golda T, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Jenkins JT, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Khan MS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kusters M, Lago V, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, O’Dwyer ST, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Radwan RW, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Renehan A, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Ryan ÉJ, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Taylor C, Teras J, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Ramshorst GHV, Zoggel DV, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Verhoef C, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Winter DC, Tekkis PP. Perioperative management and anaesthetic considerations in pelvic exenterations using Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx Collaborative. BJS Open 2021; 5:zraa055. [PMID: 33609393 PMCID: PMC7893479 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multidisciplinary perioperative and anaesthetic management of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration is essential for good surgical outcomes. No clear guidelines have been established, and there is wide variation in clinical practice internationally. This consensus statement consolidates clinical experience and best practice collectively, and systematically addresses key domains in the perioperative and anaesthetic management. METHODS The modified Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus from the PelvEx Collaborative. The process included one round of online questionnaire involving controlled feedback and structured participant response, two rounds of editing, and one round of web-based voting. It was held from December 2019 to February 2020. Consensus was defined as more than 80 per cent agreement, whereas less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus. RESULTS The final consensus document contained 47 voted statements, across six key domains of perioperative and anaesthetic management in pelvic exenteration, comprising preoperative assessment and preparation, anaesthetic considerations, perioperative management, anticipating possible massive haemorrhage, stress response and postoperative critical care, and pain management. Consensus recommendations were developed, based on consensus agreement achieved on 34 statements. CONCLUSION The perioperative and anaesthetic management of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration is best accomplished by a dedicated multidisciplinary team with relevant domain expertise in the setting of a specialized tertiary unit. This consensus statement has addressed key domains within the framework of current perioperative and anaesthetic management among patients undergoing pelvic exenteration, with an international perspective, to guide clinical practice, and has outlined areas for future clinical research.
Collapse
|
20
|
Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME): recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:1647-1673. [PMID: 32651902 PMCID: PMC7508736 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01624-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical outcomes in geriatric patients may be complicated by factors such as multiple comorbidities, low functional performance, frailty, reduced homeostatic capacity, and cognitive impairment. An integrated multidisciplinary approach to management is, therefore, essential in this population, but at present, the use of such an approach is uncommon. The Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME) project has been established to address this issue. AIMS To develop evidence-based recommendations for the integrated care of geriatric surgical patients. METHODS A 14-member Expert Task Force of surgeons, anesthetists, and geriatricians was established to develop evidence-based recommendations for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of hospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective surgery. A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence was rated using the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force criteria. RESULTS A total of 81 recommendations were proposed, covering preoperative evaluation and care (30 items), intraoperative management (19 items), and postoperative care and discharge (32 items). CONCLUSIONS These recommendations should facilitate the multidisciplinary management of older surgical patients, integrating the expertise of the surgeon, the anesthetist, the geriatrician, and other specialists and health care professionals (where available) as needed. These roles may vary according to the phase and setting of care and the patient's conditions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Aseni P, Orsenigo S, Storti E, Pulici M, Arlati S. Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review. Patient Saf Surg 2019; 13:32. [PMID: 31660064 PMCID: PMC6806509 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-019-0213-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A substantial number of patients are at high-risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both. Most perioperative deaths are represented by patients who present insufficient physiological reserve to meet the demands of major surgery. Recognition and management of critical high-risk surgical patients require dedicated and effective teams, capable of preventing, recognize, start treatment with adequate support in time to refer patients to the satisfactory ICU level provision. The main task for health-care planners and managers is to identify and reduce this severe risk and to encourage patient’s safety practices. Inadequate tissue perfusion and decreased cellular oxygenation due to hypovolemia, heart dysfunction, reduced cardiovascular reserve, and concomitant diseases are the most common causes of perioperative complications. Hemodynamic, respiratory and careful sequential monitoring have become essential aspects of the clinical practice both for surgeons and intensivists. New monitoring techniques have changed significantly over the past few years and are now able to rapidly identify shock states earlier, define the etiology, and monitor the response to different therapies. Many of these techniques are now minimally invasive or non-invasive. Advanced hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring combines invasive, non-invasive monitoring skills. Non-invasive ultrasound has emerged during the last years as an essential operative and perioperative evaluation tool, and its use is now rapidly growing. Perioperative management guided by appropriate sequential clinical evaluation combined with respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring is an established tool to help clinicians to identify those patients at higher risk in the attempt to reduce the complications rate and potentially improve patient outcomes. This review aims to provide an update of currently available standard concepts and evolving technologies of the various respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring systems for the high-risk surgical patients, highlighting their potential usefulness when integrated with careful clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Aseni
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Orsenigo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Storti
- Dipartimento Emergenza Urgenza, UOC Anestesia e Rianimazione, ASST, Lodi, Italy
| | - Marco Pulici
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Arlati
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Li P, Zeng J, Wei W, Lin J. The effects of ventilation on left-to-right shunt and regional cerebral oxygen saturation: a self-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19:178. [PMID: 31597560 PMCID: PMC6784331 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0852-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increase of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is an efficient method of modulating pulmonary and systemic blood flows (Qp/Qs) for patients with left-to-right (L-R) shunt, and is also closely associated with insufficient oxygen exchange for pulmonary hypoperfusion. So that it might be a preferred regime of maintaining arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) within an optimal boundary via ventilation management in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients for the inconvenient measure of the PVR and Qp/Qs. However, the appropriate range of PaCO2 and patient-specific mechanical ventilation settings remain controversial for CHD children with L-R shunt. METHODS Thirty-one pediatric patients with L-R shunt, 1-6 yr of age, were included in this observation study. Patients were ventilated with tidal volume (VT) of 10, 8 and 6 ml/kg in sequence, and 15 min stabilization period for individual VT. The velocity time integral (VTI) of L-R shunt, pulmonary artery (PA) and descending aorta (DA) were measured with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after an initial 15 min stabilization period for each VT, with arterial blood gas analysis. Near-infrared spectroscopy sensor were positioned on the surface of the bilateral temporal artery to monitor the change in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2). RESULTS PaCO2 was 31.51 ± 0.65 mmHg at VT 10 ml/kg vs. 37.15 ± 0.75 mmHg at VT 8 ml/kg (P < 0.03), with 44.24 ± 0.99 mmHg at VT 6 ml/kg significantly higher than 37.15 ± 0.75 mmHg at VT 8 ml/kg. However, PaO2 at a VT of 6 ml/kg was lower than that at a VT of 10 ml/kg (P = 0.05). Meanwhile, 72% (22/31) patients had PaCO2 in the range of 40-50 mmHg at VT 6 ml/kg. VTI of L-R shunt and PA at VT 6 ml/kg were lower than that at VT of 8 and 10 ml/kg (P < 0.05). rScO2 at a VT of 6 ml/kg was higher than that at a VT of 8 and 10 ml/kg (P < 0.05), with a significantly correlation between rScO2 and PaCO2 (r = 0.53). VTI of PA in patients with defect diameter > 10 mm was higher that that in patients with defect diameter ≤ 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS Maintaining PaCO2 in the boundary of 40-50 mmHg with VT 6 ml/kg might be a feasible ventilation regime to achieve better oxygenation for patients with L-R shunt. Continue raising PaCO2 should be careful. TRAIL REGISTRATION Clinical Trial Registry of China (http://www.chictr.org.cn) identifier: ChiCTR-OOC-17011338 , prospectively registered on May 9, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiyi Li
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang 37, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jun Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Jing Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|