Effects of goal-directed analgesia using the analgesia nociception index in children undergoing surgery for moyamoya disease: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The potential benefits of Analgesia Nociception Index guided intra-operative analgesia on intra-operative opioid consumption remains to be demonstrated in paediatric anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the effects of Analgesia Nociception Index guided analgesia on sufentanil consumption during anaesthesia and postoperative pain scores in paediatric patients with moyamoya disease.

DESIGN

A prospective randomised controlled study.

SETTING

Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

PATIENTS

A total of 40 children scheduled for encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was total intra-operative sufentanil consumption, and the secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and incidence of opioid-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The Analgesia Nociception Index group showed lower intra-operative sufentanil consumption (in μg kg -1  h -1 ) compared with the Standard group (0.30 ± 0.12 and 0.39 ± 0.17, respectively; mean difference, -0.09; 95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.00; P  = 0.049). Postoperatively, compared with the Standard group, the Analgesia Nociception Index group reported lower median pain scores at 18 and 24 h and maximum pain within 24 h (1 [0 to 2] vs. 3 [2 to 5]; P  = 0.004, 1 [0 to 2] vs. 3 [1 to 4]; P  = 0.041, and 4 [3 to 5] vs. 5 [4 to 7]; P  = 0.045, respectively), with fewer patients experiencing nausea (3 [15%] vs. 10 [50%], P  = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The Analgesia Nociception Index guided analgesic protocol can reduce intra-operative sufentanil consumption and postoperative pain within 24 h with fewer nausea symptoms in paediatric patients with moyamoya disease who undergo encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05672212.

Machine learning model of facial expression outperforms models using analgesia nociception index and vital signs to predict postoperative pain intensity: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the use of automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based pain recognition in postoperative settings or the correlation with pain intensity. In this study, various machine learning (ML)-based models using facial expressions, the analgesia nociception index (ANI), and vital signs were developed to predict postoperative pain intensity, and their performances for predicting severe postoperative pain were compared.

METHODS

In total, 155 facial expressions from patients who underwent gastrectomy were recorded postoperatively; one blinded anesthesiologist simultaneously recorded the ANI score, vital signs, and patient self-assessed pain intensity based on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The ML models' area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were calculated and compared using DeLong's test.

RESULTS

ML models were constructed using facial expressions, ANI, vital signs, and different combinations of the three datasets. The ML model constructed using facial expressions best predicted an NRS ≥ 7 (AUROC 0.93) followed by the ML model combining facial expressions and vital signs (AUROC 0.84) in the test-set. ML models constructed using combined physiological signals (vital signs, ANI) performed better than models based on individual parameters for predicting NRS ≥ 7, although the AUROCs were inferior to those of the ML model based on facial expressions (all P < 0.050). Among these parameters, absolute and relative ANI had the worst AUROCs (0.69 and 0.68, respectively) for predicting NRS ≥ 7.

CONCLUSIONS

The ML model constructed using facial expressions best predicted severe postoperative pain (NRS ≥ 7) and outperformed models constructed from physiological signals.

Surgical pleth index monitoring in perioperative pain management: usefulness and limitations

Surgical pleth index (SPI) monitoring is a representative, objective nociception-monitoring device that measures nociception using photoplethysmographic signals. It is easy to apply to patients and the numerical calculation formula is intuitively easy to understand; therefore, its clinical interpretation is simple. Several studies have demonstrated its efficacy and utility. Compared with hemodynamic parameters, the SPI can detect the degree of nociception during surgery under general anesthesia with greater accuracy, and therefore can provide better guidance for the administration of various opioids, including remifentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil. Indeed, SPI-guided analgesia is associated with lower intraoperative opioid consumption, faster patient recovery, and comparable or lower levels of postoperative pain and rates of adverse events compared with conventional analgesia. In addition, SPI monitoring allows for the degree of postoperative pain and analgesic requirements to be predicted through the SPI values immediately before patient arousal. However, because patient age, effective circulating volume, position, concomitant medication and anesthetic regimen and level of consciousness may be confounding factors in SPI monitoring, clinicians must be careful when interpreting SPI values. In addition, as SPI values can differ depending on anesthetic and analgesic regimens and the underlying disease, an awareness of the effects of these variables with an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of SPI monitoring compared to other nociception monitoring devices is essential. Therefore, this review aimed to help clinicians perform optimal SPI-guided analgesia and to assist with the establishment of future research designs through clarifying current usefulness and limitations of SPI monitoring in perioperative pain management.

Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The analgesia nociception index (ANI) has emerged as a potential measurement for objective pain assessment during general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI in assessing intra- and post-operative pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, public clinical trial databases (ClinicalTrials and Clinical Research Information Service), and OpenSIGLE to identify relevant studies published prior to May 2023 and included studies that evaluated the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI for intra- or post-operative pain assessment during general anesthesia. Among the 962 studies identified, 30 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis. For predicting intra-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve of ANI were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-0.83; I2 = 68.2%), 0.93 (95% CI = 0.92-0.93; I2 = 99.8%), 2.32 (95% CI = 1.33-3.30; I2 = 61.7%), and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.76-0.78; I2 = 87.4%), respectively. ANI values and changes in intra-operative hemodynamic variables showed statistically significant correlations. For predicting post-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ANI were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87-0.93; I2 = 58.7%), 0.51 (95% CI = 0.49-0.52; I2 = 99.9%), and 3.38 (95% CI = 2.87-3.88; I2 = 81.2%), respectively. ANI monitoring in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia is a valuable measurement for predicting intra- and post-operative pain. It reduces the use of intra-operative opioids and aids in pain management throughout the perioperative period.

Effect of S-ketamine on the intraoperative Surgical Pleth Index in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-center randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether S-ketamine affects the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to an S-ketamine group (group S) and an equivalent normal saline group (group N). SPI values were recorded; and pain score on a numerical rating scale (NRS), the consumption of opioids, rescue analgesia, and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The SPI and heart rate of the S-ketamine group were significantly lower 30 minutes after the start of surgery and at the end. The NRS score was lower in the S-ketamine group 6 and 12 hours postoperatively, but there were no differences in mean blood pressure or the NRS score 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Rescue analgesia was required less frequently by the S-ketamine group, but the incidence of PONV did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

S-ketamine was associated with lower intraoperative SPI 30 minutes after the start and at the end of surgery. It also reduced opioid use intraoperatively and the NRS scores 6 and 12 hours postoperatively.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000040012), 18/11/2020.

The validity and applications of the analgesia nociception index: a narrative review

Pain refers to the subjective, unpleasant experience that is related to illness or injury. In contrast to pain, nociception refers to the physiological neural processing of noxious stimuli, such as intra-operative surgical stimuli. One novel device, the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), aims to objectively measure intra-operative nociception by analyzing the heart rate variability in patients undergoing surgery. Through this method of nociceptive monitoring, the ANI device aims to provide an objective, continuous evaluation of patient comfort levels and allow anesthesiologists to better manage surgical stress and patient analgesia, perhaps with even better efficacy than current practices used to assess nociception. Additionally, ANI may have clinical application in settings outside of the operating room, such as in the intensive care unit. In this narrative review, we compiled and summarized the findings of many studies that have investigated ANI's validity and applications in different clinical settings. Currently, the literature appears mostly supportive of ANI's ability to detect nociception in both surgical and non-surgical settings. However, the ability for ANI to provide clinical benefits, such as decreased intra-operative opioid use, post-operative opioid use, and post-operative pain compared to standard practices appear controversial. Because of the wide variety of methodology, clinical settings, patient populations, and limitations in these studies, more investigation of ANI is needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn on its clinical benefits.

Effect of analgesia nociception index monitor-based nociception control on perioperative stress responses during laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The analgesia nociception index (ANI) monitor is a nociception monitoring device based on heart rate variability. We aimed to determine the effect of ANI monitor-based intraoperative nociception control on the perioperative stress response during laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position.

Methods

Altogether, 72 female patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomized to either the control or ANI group. Intraoperative nociception was controlled by remifentanil administration in a conventional manner (based on blood pressure and heart rate) in the control group and by ANI monitoring in the ANI group. Perioperative stress responses were estimated by measuring the levels of serum catecholamines and catabolic stress hormones at three timepoints: after loss of consciousness, at the end of surgery, and 1 h after the end of surgery.

Results

The serum cortisol level at the end of surgery was significantly higher in the ANI group than in the control group (p < 0.001), although more remifentanil was administered in the ANI group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Changes in the other estimators' levels were comparable between groups during the perioperative period. The hemodynamic profiles during surgery were also significantly different between the two groups. Phenylephrine use to treat hypotension was more common in the ANI group than in the control group (p = 0.005). However, postoperative clinical outcomes such as pain and nausea/vomiting did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

ANI monitor-based nociception control in laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position did not improve perioperative stress responses, intraoperative opioid consumption, or postoperative clinical outcomes.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04343638).

A randomised controlled trial of the analgesia nociception index for intra-operative remifentanil dose and pain after gynaecological laparotomy

We aimed to investigate the effect of the analgesia nociception index on postoperative pain. We randomly allocated 170 women scheduled for gynaecological laparotomy and analysed results from 159: in 80 women, remifentanil was infused to maintain analgesia nociception indices 50-70; and in 79 women, remifentanil was infused to maintain systolic blood pressure < 120% of baseline values. The primary outcome was the proportion of women with pain scores ≥ 5 (scale 0-10) within 40 min of admission to recovery. The proportion of women with pain scores ≥ 5 was 62/80 (78%) vs. 64/79 (81%), p = 0.73. Mean (SD) doses of fentanyl in recovery were 53.6 (26.9) μg vs. 54.8 (20.8) μg, p = 0.74. Intra-operative remifentanil doses were 0.124 (0.050) μg.kg-1 .min-1 vs. 0.129 (0.044) μg.kg-1 .min-1 , p = 0.55.

Analgesia nociception index and high frequency variability index: promising indicators of relative parasympathetic tone

At present, there is no objective and absolute measure of nociception, although various monitoring techniques have been developed. One such technique is the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), which is calculated from heart rate variability that reflects the relative parasympathetic tone. ANI is expressed on a non-unit scale of 0-100 (100 indicates maximal relative parasympathetic tone). Several studies indicated that ANI-guided anesthesia may help reduce intraoperative opioid use. The usefulness of ANI in the intensive care unit (ICU) and during surgery has also been reported. However, some limitations of ANI have also been reported; for example, ANI is affected by emotions and some drugs. In 2022, a high frequency variability index (HFVI), which was renamed from ANI and uses the same algorithm as ANI, was commercialized; therefore, ANI/HFVI are currently in the spotlight. Unlike ANI, HFVI can be displayed along with other biometric information on the Root® monitor. ANI/HFVI monitoring may affect the prognosis of not only patients in the perioperative period but those in ICU, those who receive home medical care, or outpatients. In this article, we present an updated review on ANI that has been published in the last decade, introduce HFVI, and discuss the outlooks of ANI/HFVI.

Usefulness of Analgesia Nociception Index for guiding intraoperative opioid administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study primarily aimed at investigating the efficacy of Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) for guiding intraoperative opioid administration in patients receiving surgery under general anesthesia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The Medline, Embase, Google scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to April 2022 for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was intraoperative opioid administration, while the secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, pain score, emergency time, risk of nausea/vomiting (PONV), and Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) stay.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Six studies including 399 participants (published from 2015 to 2022) focused on non-cardiac surgery, including spine surgery (two trials), breast surgery (two trials), gynecologic surgery (one trial), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (one trial) were included. Meta-analysis revealed no difference in intraoperative opioid administration with the use of ANI-guided analgesia compared to the control group that used conventional clinical measurements (e.g., heart rate) to guide opioid use [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.17, 95% CI: -0.56 to 0.22, P=0.39, I²=72%, six trials, 399 participants]. Gender-based subgroup analysis showed effectiveness of ANI for reducing opioid administration in female patients (SMD=-0.53, P=0.02). There were no differences in postoperative recovery characteristics including pain score [Mean difference (MD): -0.03, P=0.79], opioid consumption (SMD: -0.34, P=0.08), emergence time (MD=1.12, P=0.47), length of stay in the PACU (MD: -0.56, P=0.83), and risk of PONV [risk ratio(RR): 0.75, P=0.46] between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesia nociception index-guided analgesia was unable to reduce intraoperative opioid administration compared to monitoring using conventional clinical parameters. Further studies are required to support our findings.

Effects of deep neuromuscular block on surgical pleth index-guided remifentanil administration in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a prospective randomized trial

Deep neuromuscular block (NMB) has been increasingly utilized, but its role in reducing intraoperative opioid requirement has yet to be investigated. Surgical pleth index (SPI) quantifies nociception. We investigated the effects of deep NMB on SPI-guided remifentanil administration in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Total 128 patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly allocated to two groups of NMB: deep (n = 64) and moderate (n = 64). The remifentanil dose was assessed during intubation, from skin incision until CO₂ insertion, and pneumoperitoneum. Mean infusion rate of remifentanil during pneumoperitoneum was higher in moderate NMB group than in deep NMB group (0.103 [0.075-0.143] µg/kg/min vs. 0.073 [0.056-0.097] µg/kg/min, p < 0.001). Consequently, median infusion rate of remifentanil during anesthesia was higher in moderate NMB group (0.076 [0.096-0.067] µg/kg/min vs. 0.067 [0.084-0.058] µg/kg/min, p = 0.016). The duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay was longer in the moderate NMB group (40 [30-40] min vs. 30 [30-40] min, p = 0.045). In conclusion, deep NMB reduced the remifentanil requirement compared with moderate NMB in SPI-guided anesthesia for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Analgesia Nociception Index-Guided Remifentanil versus Standard Care during Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The clinical benefits to be expected from intraoperative nociception monitors are currently under investigation. Among these devices, the Analgesia Nociception-Index (ANI) has shown promising results under sevoflurane anesthesia. Our study investigated ANI-guided remifentanil administration under propofol anesthesia. We hypothesized that ANI guidance would result in reduced remifentanil consumption compared with standard management. This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, bi-centric study included women undergoing elective gynecologic surgery under target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Patients were randomly assigned to an ANI or Standard group. In the ANI group, remifentanil target concentration was adjusted by 0.5 ng mL⁻¹ steps every 5 min according to the ANI value. In the Standard group, remifentanil was managed according to standard practice. Our primary objective was to compare remifentanil consumption between the groups. Our secondary objectives were to compare the quality of anesthesia, postoperative analgesia and the incidence of chronic pain. Eighty patients were included. Remifentanil consumption was lower in the ANI group: 4.4 (3.3; 5.7) vs. 5.8 (4.9; 7.1) µg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ (difference = −1.4 (95% CI, −2.6 to −0.2), p = 0.0026). Propofol consumption was not different between the groups. Postoperative pain scores were low in both groups. There was no difference in morphine consumption 24 h after surgery. The proportion of patients reporting pain 3 months after surgery was 18.8% in the ANI group and 30.8% in the Standard group (difference = −12.0 (95% CI, −32.2 to 9.2)). ANI guidance resulted in lower remifentanil consumption compared with standard practice under propofol anesthesia. There was no difference in short- or long-term postoperative analgesia.

Multiparametric Monitoring of Hypnosis and Nociception-Antinociception Balance during General Anesthesia-A New Era in Patient Safety Standards and Healthcare Management

The development of general anesthesia techniques and anesthetic substances has opened new horizons for the expansion and improvement of surgical techniques. Nevertheless, more complex surgical procedures have brought a higher complexity and longer duration for general anesthesia, which has led to a series of adverse events such as hemodynamic instability, under- or overdosage of anesthetic drugs, and an increased number of post-anesthetic events. In order to adapt the anesthesia according to the particularities of each patient, the multimodal monitoring of these patients is highly recommended. Classically, general anesthesia monitoring consists of the analysis of vital functions and gas exchange. Multimodal monitoring refers to the concomitant monitoring of the degree of hypnosis and the nociceptive-antinociceptive balance. By titrating anesthetic drugs according to these parameters, clinical benefits can be obtained, such as hemodynamic stabilization, the reduction of awakening times, and the reduction of postoperative complications. Another important aspect is the impact on the status of inflammation and the redox balance. By minimizing inflammatory and oxidative impact, a faster recovery can be achieved that increases patient safety. The purpose of this literature review is to present the most modern multimodal monitoring techniques to discuss the particularities of each technique.

Predictive value of the surgical pleth index for the hemodynamic responses to trachea intubation and skin incision

Surgical pleth index (SPI) has been widely investigated in assessing the nociceptive level. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SPI level and patient responses to trachea intubation and skin incision. A total of 40 patients undergoing open abdominal general surgery were recruited for analyses. The patients were monitored with electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, SpO₂, invasive blood pressure and SPI before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, sufentanil and rocuronium and maintained with sufentanil and sevoflurane. Blood pressure, heart rate and SPI were recorded for analyses during the peri-intubation and peri-incision periods. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to analyze the predictive value of blood pressure, heart rate (HR) and SPI for hemodynamic responses for trachea intubation and skin incision. SPI had a similar changing trend to systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The SPI level was linearly correlated with SBP, DBP and HR. SPI increased significantly after intubation and incision in patients with positive but not negative responses to intubation and incision. The ROC analysis showed that only SBP level is predictive of intubation responses. These data suggested that SPI elevated under the noxious stimulation by intubation and incision, but it was not predictive of the hemodynamic responses to intubation and incision.

Pain monitor: reality or fantasy in ambulatory patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In an unconscious patient, there can be significant challenges to monitoring nociception and proper dosing of analgesic medications. The traditional measures of intraoperative nociception have poor sensitivity and specificity with little predictive value in postoperative outcomes such as postoperative pain, opioid-induced side effects, length of stay or incidence of opioid use disorder. To date, several monitoring modalities are in development to establish objective measures of the balance between nociception and analgesia with the goal of guiding anesthesiologists and improve patient outcomes. In this review, some of the most promising monitoring modalities are discussed with the most recent findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple modalities are beginning to demonstrate utility compared with traditional care. Most, but not all, of these studies show decreased intraoperative opioid use and some show lower pain scores and opioid requirements in the postanesthesia care unit.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence points to promising efficacy for these monitoring modalities; however, this field is in its infancy. More investigation is required to demonstrate differences in outcome compared with traditional care, and these differences need to be of sufficient import to achieve widespread adoption.