Association of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio to overall mortality after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive ability of neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for overall mortality after EVAR for AAA.

METHODS

Data on patients with AAA treated by EVAR between March 2012 and December 2016 were obtained from a prospectively maintained EVAR database at Tokyo Medical University Hospital. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. A cut-off value of total WBC count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and NLR was determined according to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard analyses to account for the time at risk.

RESULTS

178 patients were included in this study after selection based on the exclusion criteria. The subjects consisted of 150 men and 28 women with a mean age of 77.5 years (range, 51-89 years). A ROC curve analysis determined the optimal cut-off values of preoperative total WBC, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and NLR for predicting overall mortality with 7,050 /μL, 4,012 /μL, 1,312 /μL, and 3.19, respectively. On univariate analysis and multivariate analyses, octogenarian, obesity, COPD, active cancer, and lymphocytopenia or NLR were detected as independent predictors for overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific leukocyte populations, such as lymphocyte count and NLR, are useful biomarkers to predict overall mortality in patients undergoing EVAR for AAA, suggesting that WBC count and its subsets, which are easy to perform a test, may be used to stratify patients at risk for poor prognosis following EVAR.

Association of preoperative pulse wave velocity to aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

Arterial stiffness may be the underlying cause of the divergent sac behavior after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). We evaluated arterial stiffness using pulse wave velocity (PWV) in patients undergoing EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and demonstrated that arterial stiffness is a predictor for determining sac behavior after EVAR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred nineteen patients with infrarenal AAA undergoing EVAR between November 2013 and July 2019 were included in this study. Preoperative brachial-ankle PWV was measured using an automated oscillometric method at our vascular laboratory. PWV and other risk factors were assessed with respect to being a risk factor for sac shrinkage at 2 years postoperatively. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed preoperative PWV (odds ratio [OR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.98; p = 0.045) and the incidence of operative type II endoleak (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.10-0.81; p = 0.048) as an independent risk factor for sac shrinkage at 2 year postoperatively. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value for predicting sac shrinkage was 17.79 m/s, and significantly predicted sac shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PWV was independently associated with sac shrinkage after EVAR, suggesting that arterial stiffness may be one of the key factors for determining sac behavior after EVAR.

Covered Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has largely shifted to endovascular techniques, with primary stenting constituting the preferred treatment approach. The goal of the current study was to summarize available literature and to determine whether covered stents are superior to bare metal stents for the treatment of AIOD, in terms of both periprocedural and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 47 studies was conducted with the use of random effects modeling. The incidence of adverse events during follow up among the individual included studies was synthesized.

RESULTS

Most of the lesions were located at the common iliac arteries and were chronic total occlusions. The procedure was technically successful in almost all cases in both groups, with a low rate of periprocedural complications observed in both groups. The reported primary patency rates for the non-covered and covered stent group during an average follow up of 24.3 months among the individual studies, were 84% and 92% respectively, while surgical or endovascular re-intervention was required in 10% of non-covered stent cases and in 6% of covered stent cases. Eight studies comparing covered vs non-covered stents in terms of patency demonstrated superiority of covered stents (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.01-6.01; p = 0.047 Combining TASC C/D lesions together 12 studies reported 92% (95%CI:89%-95%) primary patency in the covered stent group, while 7 studies reported 75% (95%CI: 60%-88%) primary patency for cases treated with non-covered stents.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that covered stents are safe and effective when utilized for the treatment of AIOD. Covered stents were associated with a statistically significant higher odds of primary patency in both the overall cohort and in more complex TASC C/D lesions. However, additional high-quality comparative analyses between covered vs bare metal stents and between several types of covered stents are needed to determine the most optimal treatment modality for AIOD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular vs Open Surgical Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is inferior to open surgical repair in terms of adverse events during late follow up, defined as >8 years after the procedure.

BACKGROUND

EVAR is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery in the early perioperative period. However, it is unknown whether this pattern remains during long-term follow up >8 years.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random effects modeling. Hazard ratios were calculated for mortality at different time intervals, and risk ratios were calculated in cases where the total number of events was available.

RESULTS

There was no difference in all-cause mortality during follow up of each study (HR: 1.04; 95%CI: 0.93-1.17; I² = 16.0%). Subgroup analyses for all-cause mortality at 4 to 8 years of follow up (HR: 1.13; 95%CI: 0.94-1.35; I² = 0.0%) and all-cause mortality at follow up >8 years (HR: 1.07; 95%CI: 0.89-0.28; I² = 36.6%) also did not show any significant difference between the two approaches. The risks of aneurysm-related mortality and aneurysm rupture were similar during follow-up. However, the cumulative risk for reintervention during follow up was greater in the EVAR group (RR: 2.18; 95%CI: 1.50-3.17; I² = 76.1%) and occurred in 29% vs 15% of patients in the EVAR vs surgery groups respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR and open surgical repair of AAA are equally safe and have no difference in all-cause mortality. However, endovascular repair is associated with an increased need for re-intervention. Emerging technology in endovascular devices will likely further improve the outcomes of EVAR. Subject codes: Meta-analysis; aneurysm; atherosclerosis; complications.