The minimal clinically-important difference of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire - Mobility Scale in subjects undergoing lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation training

Assessing Phase-Change Materials as Effective Long-Term Biosensors in Limb Prosthetics

Monitoring and controlling the microclimate at the skin-socket interface of limb prostheses is an important, yet unresolved, clinical problem. Phase-change materials (PCMs) represent a promising biosensor technology that holds the potential to both detect and alter (i.e., stabilize) changes in the temperature of a hybrid biological/mechanical system, such as a prosthesis. The biologically inspired sensor capabilities of PCMs can enhance the internal socket conditions and offer improved comfort and suspension while minimizing skin injuries for prosthesis users. This study investigated how prosthetic liners equipped with PCM biosensors affected the long-term outcomes for prosthesis users. In this double-blinded longitudinal crossover study, a cohort of transtibial prosthesis users wore regular conventional liners for six months and PCM liners for another six months. Prosthesis utilization, physical performance, and gait symmetry were studied using Modus StepWatch, the 2-minute walk test, and the TekScan F-Scan gait test, respectively. Measured parameters from these various tests, acquired at multiple timepoints during the study, were compared pairwise between the two liners per individual. While the obtained quantitative data trends, such as the gait symmetry, favored the PCM liners, no statistically significant differences were found between the PCM and conventional gel liners in any of the study parameters.

Head-to-head Rasch comparison of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Section and the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire 2.0 in Italian lower-limb prosthesis users

BACKGROUND

The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Section (PEQ-MS) and the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ 2.0) are two validated self-report questionnaires assessing mobility in people with lower-limb amputation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the psychometric properties of PEQ-MS and PMQ 2.0 in a sample of 100 Italian lower-limb prosthesis users.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary Rasch analysis of data from a prospective single-group observational study, comparing the PEQ-MS and PMQ 2.0 head to head and then cocalibrating them onto a common interval-scaled metric, through common-person equating, to compare their operational range.

RESULTS

The PMQ 2.0 showed good measurement qualities. The PEQ-MS had acceptable psychometric properties, despite some weakness in item selection. Cocalibration of the two questionnaires indicated that they assess the same underlying construct (prosthetic mobility), but PMQ 2.0 items have a wider range of difficulty (by one logit). Finally, we created a nomogram allowing to "cross-walk" between scores of the two questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the two questionnaires showed that the PMQ 2.0 has a better measurement performance and larger operational range than the PEQ-MS, making it more suitable for assessing lower-limb prosthesis users with a large range of locomotor abilities, in particular those with higher mobility levels.

Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures

BACKGROUND

Outcome measures (patient-reported and performance-based) are used widely but not uniformly within the clinical setting for individuals with lower-limb absence (LLA). The need for more detailed information by funding bodies, service planners and providers, and researchers requires the systematic and routine use of outcome measures. Currently, there is no consensus on which outcome measure(s) should be used for individuals with LLA. The aim of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) lower-limb Consensus Outcome Measures for Prosthetic and Amputation Services (COMPASS) was to produce a recommended list of outcome measures to be actively promoted for routine use within clinical practice before and after an episode of care.

METHODS

Between May and June 2021, 46 users, clinicians, researchers, managers, and policymakers working in the field of LLA and prosthetic users met virtually. Consensus participants were first asked to complete an online survey with questions based on the results from a systematic review and the outcomes from an expert panel. A modified Delphi technique was used to determine outcome measures for use in routine clinical practice. This paper discusses the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS process from which recommendations were made.

RESULTS

The ISPO lower-limb COMPASS resulted in the following 6 recommendations: (1) Amputee Mobility Predictor, Timed Up and Go, Two-Minute Walk Test, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Residual Limb Health, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Utility, and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which make up the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS ; (2) Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor and Six-Minute Walk Test are 2 additional outcome measures recommended for higher-activity-level individuals with LLA, which make up the COMPASS+ ; (3) Patient-Specific Function Scale makes up the COMPASS Adjunct ; (4) a generic health-related quality of life outcome measure such as the European Quality of Life-5D-5L or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 item can be used to supplement the COMPASS; (5) outcome measures suited to low- and middle-income countries need to be developed with a focus on activities such as sitting cross-legged, kneeling, squatting, and other culturally important mobility-related activities; and (6) translation, validation, and open sharing of translated outcome measures included in the COMPASS, COMPASS+, and COMPASS Adjunct occurs.

CONCLUSION

The above recommendations represent the current status of knowledge on outcome measures for LLA based on research and international consensus and hence, will change over time. This work has been developed for clinicians and researchers to improve knowledge on outcome measures to guide clinical decision-making and future research initiatives.

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord injury (TASS)

OBJECTIVE

To confirm the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS).

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 48 Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) (age 64.1 ± 10.4 yrs, 28 with tetraplegia) admitted to two institutions at admission, at 1 month of hospitalization, and at discharge with the TASS, the Trunk Control Test in individuals with an SCI (TCT-SCI) motor score, the Functional Independence Measure motor score (mFIM), and the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS). We assessed the TASS responsiveness by determining the correlation coefficients for the changes in the TASS' and other assessments' scores. We calculated the MCIDs by five anchor-based methods.

RESULTS

The changes in the TASS and those in the other assessments were weakly correlated at 1 month and moderately correlated at discharge. The TASS MCIDs were observed at 1 month and at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirmed that the change in TASS scores had weak-to-moderate correlations with the changes in the participants' upper- and lower-limb function and activities of daily living. Using the MCID for the TASS determined by anchor-based methods may lead to a better interpretation of changes in the trunk function of individuals with SCIs.

Does socket liner material affect clinical outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users? Insights from a randomized control trial

Among the noted disadvantages of prosthesis suspension by flexible liner is the increased rate of perspiration within the socket, which has the potential to cause discomfort, suspension issues, and tissue damage. In recent years, phase change material technology has been adopted for the use in prosthesis liners. These promise to improve temperature control and, consequently, reduce sweating. Previous work has demonstrated that this approach is effective in slowing the temperature increase at the limb-socket interface, but it was not clear how this would translate to clinical outcomes. This study had the aim to compare conventional and phase change material liners regarding prosthesis utilization, physical performance, and patient-reported outcome measures. A randomized double-blind cross-over study design with 6-month intervention periods was used. Of the 42 enrolled participants, only 50% completed the protocol. The high attrition was in large part because of the COVID-19 pandemic that started disrupting daily life and thereby the data collection midway through the study period. The findings indicate that the temperature control liners were, by trend, associated with better prosthesis utilization. The found effects did not reach the level of statistical significance, which is likely a result of the unduly reduced sample size.

Quality of Life in Lower-Limb Amputees 10 Years After the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of quality of life (QOL) in the lower-limb amputees 10 years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.

METHODS

In the cross-sectional study, 66 lower-limb amputees were recruited. The prosthetics-related QOL was assessed using the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) in terms of the scales of utility, appearance, sounds, residual limb health, perceived response, frustration, social burden, ambulation, and well-being. The score of each PEQ subscale was calculated and compared among the cohorts with different demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

The PEQ scores showed that the scales of sounds, residual limb health, and frustration were still low in the lower-limb amputees 10 years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. The comparison of PEQ scales among cohorts with different demographic characteristics indicated that the potential demographic risk factors, namely, age, marital status, educational level, living independence, and comorbidity, were associated with prosthesis-related QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

The prosthesis-related QOL of the lower-limb amputees 10 years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake has been partly documented in this study. The potential demographic risk factors associated with QOL of amputees were also identified. These findings could enhance the understanding of prosthesis-related QOL of lower-limb amputees sustained in an earthquake and facilitate the optimization of post-disaster rehabilitation strategies.

Minimal clinically important difference in walking velocity, gait profile score and two minute walk test for individuals with lower limb amputation

BACKGROUND

Individuals with lower limb amputation are routinely assessed with a variety outcome measures, however there is a lack of published data to indicate minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for many of these outcome measures. Three such important gait-specific outcome measures include walking velocity, gait profile score (GPS) and the two minute walk test (2MWT).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Determine the MCIDs for walking velocity, GPS and 2MWT for individuals with lower limb amputation.

METHODS

Walking velocity and GPS (n = 60), and 2MWT (n = 119) data for individuals with unilateral transfemoral or knee disarticulation were identified retrospectively from a database held at the study centre. An anchor-based method was used with Medicare functional classification level (MFCL) acting as the impairment-related criterion, and a least-squares linear regression approach was used to calculate the gradient required for a change between MFCL levels.

RESULTS

An increase of 0.21 m/s (95 % CI: 0.13,0.29) for walking velocity, a reduction of 1.7° (95 % CI: -2.449,-1.097) for GPS and an increase of 37.2 m (95 % CI: 28.8,45.5) for 2MWT were found to correspond to an increase in MFCL of one level. Walking velocity, GPS and 2MWT correlated with MFCL with R² values of 0.333, 0.322 and 0.398 respectively (p < 0.00001). The authors propose that 0.21 m/s for walking velocity, 1.7° for GPS and 37.2 m for 2MWT be used as MCID values for individuals with lower limb amputation.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this study can be used to help both researchers and clinicians to objectively evaluate if interventions for individuals with lower limb amputation are effective.

A new valid Walking Aid Scale better predicts distance walked by prosthesis users than Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire 2.0 and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale

The availability of psychometrically-sound and parsimonious outcome measures is key for optimizing decision-making about prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation in lower limb prosthesis users. Despite the increasing clinical use of observational and self-reported scales for assessing mobility and balance, there is currently no scale that accounts for the use of assistive devices while walking under conditions of increasing difficulty. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a Walking Aid Scale (WAS) in a cross-sectional sample of 144 prosthesis users. Specifically, we examined internal consistency and concurrent validity of WAS against two commonly used self-report measures of prosthetic mobility and balance confidence - the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire 2.0 (PMQ 2.0) and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-5). The predictive value of WAS, in comparison to PMQ 2.0 and ABC-5, was assessed using a 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and participants' characteristics. The WAS showed significant moderate-to-good correlations with PMQ 2.0 and ABC-5, and all scales correlated well with age and 6MWT. Participants who relied less on walking aids reported higher mobility levels, greater balance confidence, and walked longer distances. Age was associated with greater use of walking aids and lower mobility and balance confidence. In the stepwise linear regression analysis, age, amputation level, time since amputation, and WAS predicted about two-thirds of the variability in 6MWT with no significant contribution of PMQ 2.0 and ABC-5. These findings indicate that WAS is a valid instrument and a better predictor of walking distance than PMQ 2.0 and ABC-5 in the lower limb prosthesis users.

Functional performance differences between carbon fiber and fiberglass prosthetic feet

BACKGROUND

Persons with lower limb amputation require increased functionality. The largest category of feet for active individuals with a transtibial amputation is energy storage and return (ESR) feet. These feet are typically constructed of carbon fiber composite materials. Recently, a prosthetic foot composed of a fiberglass composite has emerged in the market. However, there are no comparative studies of these devices.

OBJECTIVES

Compare the biomechanical performance and prosthesis-related quality of life when using a fiberglass prosthetic foot design compared with traditional carbon fiber ESR designs.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a repeated-measures randomized cross-over trial.

METHODS

Gait analysis was performed on 10 experienced male subjects with unilateral transtibial amputations (K-level III) while walking on level ground and a ramp. Patient-reported outcomes were collected using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Gait data demonstrated increased ankle dorsiflexion (P < .01), similar ankle moments (P = .07), and increased ankle power generation (P = .01) when using the fiberglass foot. The increased power generation occurred at the correct time in the gait cycle such that the timing and magnitude of peak knee flexion was unaffected (P > .19). The fiberglass foot had greater energy absorption during gait (P = .01) with no difference in energy return (P = .37). The subjects expressed improved prosthesis-related quality of life with the fiberglass foot (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate that the new ESR foot comprising a fiberglass material had better performance than traditional designs using a carbon fiber material.

The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation

Background

The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users.

Methods

The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1.

Results

Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users’ satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure.

Selecting, Administering, and Interpreting Outcome Measures among Adults with Lower-Limb Loss: An Update for Clinicians

Purpose of review

To summarize outcome measurement research among adults with lower-limb loss (LLL) for clinicians.

Recent findings

Houghton Scale, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-mobility subscale (PEQ-m), Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP), Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor, Four Square Step Test (FSST), Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT), L Test, 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) are appropriate for evaluating individual patient changes post-LLL. Post-LLL, Socket Comfort Score, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile, Timed Up and Go, and 2 Minute Walk Test may be more appropriate for evaluating groups. Minimal detectable change is available for 15/20 reviewed measures. Many measures differ between mobility levels.

Summary

Quick, reliable measures for evaluating patient functional change include ABC, PEQ-m, PLUS-M™, FSST, and L Test; when resources allow, NBWT, 10MWT, 6WMT and AMP may be considered.