Aspiration Risk Screening With Tongue Pressure Measurement in Acute Stroke: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study Using STARD Guidelines

Introduction

Dysphagia can affect more than 50% of stroke patients in the acute phase. Aspiration pneumonia is a serious complication that can be prevented with dysphagia screening and assessment. Measurement of tongue elevation pressure is suggested to be a useful tool in aspiration risk screening.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of maximum anterior tongue elevation strength (Pmax) in acute stroke care.

Method

In this prospective study, data were collected in a neurology department (stroke center) where patients formed a consecutive case series. The sample consisted of thirty stroke patients who failed an initial dysphagia screening. Patients underwent anterior tongue elevation strength measurement (index test) during bedside dysphagia assessment by a speech-language pathologist and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (reference test) by an otorhinolaryngologist on the same day. Outcome variables (index values in kPa, reference values interpreted on the penetration-aspiration scale) were used for estimating measures of diagnostic accuracy in aspiration risk screening.

Results

Ten patients aspirated on instrumental evaluation. At the cut-off point of ≤ 34 kPa the analysis showed 90% sensitivity, 35% specificity, 41% positive predictive value, and 88% negative predictive value. The area under the curve (AUC) for Pmax was AUC = 0.700 (95% CI [0.500-0.900]).

Conclusion

Although individuals with low anterior tongue elevation strength tend to have a higher risk of aspiration, this variable alone is not capable of screening aspiration in acute stroke. In combination with a thorough noninstrumental bedside examination, it might have the potential to reduce the number of false positive cases. Further studies in this area would be worthwhile.

Quantitative Measurement of Swallowing Performance Using Iowa Oral Performance Instrument: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Swallowing is a complex but stereotyped motor activity aimed at serving two vital purposes: alimentary function and the protection of upper airways. Therefore, any impairment of the swallowing act can represent a significant clinical and personal problem that needs an accurate diagnosis by means of reliable and non-invasive techniques. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the reliability of the Iowa Oral Pressure Instrument (IOPI) in distinguishing healthy controls (HC) from patients affected by swallowing disorders or pathologies and conditions that imply dysphagia. A comprehensive search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. Overall, 271 articles were identified and, after a three-step screening, 33 case-control and interventional studies reporting IOPI measurements were included. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies resulted in being at a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis on case-control studies showed that maximum tongue pressure (MIP) values were always higher in HC than in patients, with an overall effect of the MIP difference of 18.2 KPa (17.7–18.7 KPa CI). This result was also confirmed when the sample was split into adults and children, although the MIP difference between HC and patients was greater in children than in adults (21.0 vs. 15.4 KPa in the MIP mean difference overall effect, respectively). Tongue endurance (TE) showed conflicting results among studies, with an overall effect among studies near zero (0.7 s, 0.2–1.1 s CI) and a slight tendency toward higher TE values in HC than in patients. Among the intervention studies, MIP values were higher after treatment than before, with a better outcome after the experimental tongue training exercise than traditional treatments (the MIP mean difference overall effect was 10.8 and 2.3 KPa, respectively). In conclusion, MIP values can be considered as a reliable measure of swallowing function in adults and in children, with a more marked MIP difference between HC and patients for the children population. MIP measures in patients are also able to detect the best outcome on the tongue function after the training exercise compared to traditional training.

Dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Quantification of bulbar motor dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia as a sequel and possible early sign of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is caused by progressive impaired bulbar motor function.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate bulbar motor dysfunction in patients suffering from ALS compared to a healthy reference group.

METHODS

A clinical study and prospective group comparison was designed. Patients and healthy volunteers were examined in the outpatient clinic of our university medical center. Ten patients with ALS and 20 healthy volunteers were included. All participants underwent a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and a manometric measurement of the maximal sub-palatal atmospheric pressure generated by suction as well as of the prevalent pressure during swallowing. Additionally, the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) was completed by all participants to score the self-rated extent of dysphagia.

RESULTS

Comparing maximal suction pressures, the group of patients showed significantly lower values (p < .001). There was a significant correlation between reduced pressures and the degree of dysphagia (SSQ score) (r = -0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

As the oral cavity is an easily accessible compartment of the upper digestive tract, manometric measurements might serve as a simple instrument in order to detect or to monitor bulbar motor dysfunction. Oral manometry may facilitate early detection and monitoring of dysphagia in ALS. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.