1
|
Rodriguez-Granillo AM, Solórzano L, Pérez-Omaña GV, Ascarrunz D, Pavlovsky H, Gomez-Valerio R, Bertrán I, Flores F, Parra J, Guiroy J, Mieres J, Carvajal F, Fernández-Pereira C, Rodriguez AE. Trends in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of acute coronary ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Latin American countries: insights from the CECI consortium. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1275907. [PMID: 38826814 PMCID: PMC11140057 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1275907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires revascularization treatment, preferably via primary percutaneous coronary interventions (pPCI). There is a lack of data about contemporary management of STEMI in Latin America. Methods This was a multicenter, multinational, prospective, and dynamic registry of patients undergoing pPCI in Latin America for STEMI (STEMI/LATAMI Registry) that was carried out in nine centers from five countries (Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela, Bolivia, and the Dominican Republic) between June 2021 and June 2023. All interventionalists involved in the study were originally trained at the same institution (Centro de Estudios en Cardiología Intervencionista, Buenos Aires, Argentina). The primary objective was to evaluate procedural and in-hospital outcomes of pPCI in STEMI and in-hospital outcome in the Latin America (LATAM) region; as secondary endpoints, we analyzed the following subgroups: differences between pPCI vs. pharmaco-invasive or late presenters, gender, elderly and very elderly patients, cardiogenic shock outcomes, and causes of STEMI. Results In total, 744 STEMI patients who underwent PCI between June 2021 and June 2023 in five countries (nine centers) in our continent were included; 76.3% had a pPCI, 8.1% pharmaco-invasive PCI, and 15.6% had late STEMI PCI. There were no differences in region or center when we evaluated in-hospital and 30 days of death. The rate of procedural success was 96.2%, and the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 2.2%. In the subgroup of pPCI, mean symptom onset-to-balloon time was 295.3 ± 246 min, and mean door-to-balloon time was 55.8 ± 49.9 min. The femoral approach was chosen in 60.5%. In 3.0% of patients, the left main disease was the culprit artery, with 1.63 ± 1.00 stents per patient (564 drug-eluting stents and 652 bare metal stents), with 34 patients receiving only plain optimal balloon angioplasty. Definitive stent thrombosis was related to the infarct artery as the primary cause of STEMI in 7.5% of patients. The use of assistant mechanical devices was low, at 2.1% in the pPCI group. Women were older, with large numbers in very elderly age (≥90 years), greater mortality, and incidence of spontaneous coronary dissection as a cause of STEMI (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.003, respectively). Conclusion In suitable LATAM Centers from low/medium-income countries, this prospective registry in patients with STEMI, PCI performed by well-trained operators has comparable results to those reported in well-developed countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Matías Rodriguez-Granillo
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Centro de Estudios en Cardiología Intervencionista (CECI), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Leonardo Solórzano
- Interventional Cardiology Department, CardioCentro, Manta, Manabí, Ecuador
| | | | - Diego Ascarrunz
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clínica IMA, Adrogué, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hernán Pavlovsky
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clínica IMA, Adrogué, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Reynaldo Gomez-Valerio
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Centro de Intervenciones Cardiovasculares, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ignacio Bertrán
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Otamendi, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Flores
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Otamendi, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Julio Parra
- Interventional Cardiology Department, InCorazón, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Juan Guiroy
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Cardiovascular del Chaco, Resistencia, Provincia de Chaco, Argentina
| | - Juan Mieres
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Centro de Estudios en Cardiología Intervencionista (CECI), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Otamendi, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Carvajal
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, InCorazón, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Carlos Fernández-Pereira
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Centro de Estudios en Cardiología Intervencionista (CECI), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clínica IMA, Adrogué, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Otamendi, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alfredo E. Rodriguez
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Centro de Estudios en Cardiología Intervencionista (CECI), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Sanatorio Otamendi, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laborante R, Borovac JA, Galli M, Rodolico D, Ciliberti G, Restivo A, Cappannoli L, Arcudi A, Vergallo R, Zito A, Princi G, Leone AM, Aurigemma C, Romagnoli E, Montone RA, Burzotta F, Trani C, D’Amario D. Gender-differences in antithrombotic therapy across the spectrum of ischemic heart disease: Time to tackle the Yentl syndrome? Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1009475. [PMID: 36386309 PMCID: PMC9659635 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1009475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence and clinical presentation of ischemic heart disease (IHD), as well as thrombotic and bleeding risks, appear to differ between genders. Compared with men, women feature an increased thrombotic risk, probably related to an increased platelet reactivity, higher level of coagulation factors, and sex-associated unique cardiovascular risk factors, such as pregnancy-related (i.e., pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes), gynecological disorders (i.e., polycystic ovary syndrome, early menopause) and autoimmune or systemic inflammatory diseases. At the same time, women are also at increased risk of bleeding, due to inappropriate dosing of antithrombotic agents, smaller blood vessels, lower body weight and comorbidities, such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Pharmacological strategies focused on the personalization of antithrombotic treatment may, therefore, be particularly appealing in women in light of their higher bleeding and ischemic risks. Paradoxically, although women represent a large proportion of cardiovascular patients in our practice, adequate high-quality clinical trial data on women remain scarce and inadequate to guide decision-making processes. As a result, IHD in women tends to be understudied, underdiagnosed and undertreated, a phenomenon known as a "Yentl syndrome." It is, therefore, compelling for the scientific community to embark on dedicated clinical trials to address underrepresentation of women and to acquire evidence-based knowledge in the personalization of antithrombotic therapy in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renzo Laborante
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Josip Andjelo Borovac
- Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Mattia Galli
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Daniele Rodolico
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ciliberti
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Attilio Restivo
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Cappannoli
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Arcudi
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Vergallo
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Zito
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Princi
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Maria Leone
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Aurigemma
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Antonio Montone
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D’Amario
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Angiolillo DJ, Galli M, Collet JP, Kastrati A, O'Donoghue ML. Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. EUROINTERVENTION 2022; 17:e1371-e1396. [PMID: 35354550 PMCID: PMC9896394 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-21-00904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Antiplatelet therapy is key to reducing local thrombotic complications and systemic ischaemic events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but it is inevitably associated with increased bleeding. The continuous refinement in stent technologies, together with the high incidence of ischaemic recurrences after PCI and the understanding of prognostic implications associated with bleeding, have led to a substantial evolution in antiplatelet treatment regimens over the past decades. Numerous investigations have been conducted to better stratify patients undergoing PCI according to their ischaemic and bleeding risks and to implement antithrombotic regimens accordingly. Evidence from these investigations have resulted in a number of antithrombotic treatment options as recommended by recent guidelines. In this State-of-the-Art review we provide the rationale, summarise the evidence, and discuss current and future directions of antiplatelet treatment regimens after PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominick J Angiolillo
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mattia Galli
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Jean-Philippe Collet
- ACTION Study Group, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Adnan Kastrati
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michelle L O'Donoghue
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|