Comparing the risk of cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist therapy for patient with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of teverelix DP in patients with advanced prostate cancer: A multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Teverelix drug product (DP) is a novel injectable gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.

METHODS

An adaptive phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted in patients with advanced prostate cancer to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) loading dose regimen of teverelix DP of 120 mg SC + 120 mg IM (Group 1; N = 9) or 180 mg SC + 180 mg IM (Group 2; N = 41) administered at a single visit, followed by 6-weekly SC maintenance doses of 120 mg (Group 1) or 180 mg (Group 2), up to Day 168. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving castration levels with serum testosterone <0.5 ng/mL at Day 28 with a target castration rate of 90%. Injection sites were inspected by the investigator at every visit and reactions (ISRs) were proactively recorded.

RESULTS

The target castration rate was reached in Group 2 (97.5%) but not in Group 1 (62.5%). The castration rates were not maintained to Day 42 (Group 2: 82.5%; Group 1: 50.0%). Suppression of testosterone to castrate levels occurred rapidly (median time: 2 days for both groups). Suppression of testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone was sustained throughout the treatment period, being more prominent with the higher dose. The adverse event (AE) profile was similar between groups. The most common AEs were injection-site induration (n = 40: 80.0%), injection-site erythema (n = 35: 70.0%), and hot flush (n = 21: 42.0%). Most ISRs were Grade 1.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the teverelix DP doses were generally well-tolerated but did not adequately maintain castration levels.

Adverse events related to darolutamide treatment: analysis of "real life" data from EudraVigilance and the Food and Drug Administration database entries

BACKGROUND

Aim of our study was to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with darolutamide using real life data from Eudra-Vigilance (EV) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) databases.

METHODS

EV database in European Economic Area (EEA) and the FDA FAERS database were queried to identify darolutamide AEs occurred from 30th July 2019 to May 2022. AEs were recorded in according to category and severity. Real-life data was compared to Aramis registry study.

RESULTS

The total number of AEs including data from both databases was 409 reported by FDA-FAERS and 253 reported by EV databases. On registry study, 794 AEs were reported, with serious AEs occurring in 24.8% of patients in the darolutamide group and with 1 death related to trial regimen. The most frequently reported AEs from both database were general disorders (33% and 26%), investigations (19% and 22%), gastrointestinal (15% and 11%), renal and urinary (9%), gastrointestinal (6%) and musculoskeletal disorder (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results darolutamide is safe in a real-life scenario and the most frequent side effect is fatigue. Although up to now there are few reports in both real-life databases, these data are encouraging for clinicians using darolutamide in every day clinical practice.

Adverse cardiovascular effect following gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus GnRH agonist for prostate cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Androgen deprivation therapy is the mainstay of medical treatment for prostate cancer (Pca); however, it is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events and death. To date, CV death has been the leading noncancer cause of death in Pca patients. Both GnRH antagonists (an emerging class of drugs) and GnRH agonists (most frequently prescribed) are efficacious against Pca. However, the adverse effects, especially the adverse CV effect between them remain unclear.

Methods

Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, all available studies comparing the safety of CV risk between GnRH antagonists and GnRH agonists in Pca patients were extracted. Comparisons of outcomes of interest between these two classes of drugs were calculated using the risk ratio (RR). Subgroup analyses were performed depending on the study design and preexisting CV disease at baseline.

Results

Nine randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and five real-world observational studies comprising 62160 Pca patients were included in our meta-analysis. Patients receiving GnRH antagonists experienced fewer CV events (RR: 0.66, 95% CI:0.53-0.82, P<0.001), CV death (RR:0.4, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P<0.001) and myocardial infarctions (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96, P=0.03). No difference was found in the incidence of stroke and heart failure. Moreover, GnRH antagonists were associated with fewer CV events in patients with preexisting CV disease but not in those without preexisting CV disease in the RCT series.

Conclusion

GnRH antagonists appear to offer favorable safety in terms of adverse CV events and CV death compared with GnRH agonists among men diagnosed with Pca, especially those who had established CV disease at baseline.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-2-0009/, identifier INPLASY202320009.