Current trends in 2021 in surgical management of vesico-ureteral reflux in pediatric patients: results of a multicenter international survey on 552 patients

Application of the ERAS guidelines in pediatric urological surgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Consensus for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in pediatrics has been achieved in neonatal intestinal surgery, yet it is not widely utilized in pediatric urology. We investigated the application of ERAS guidelines in pediatric urology, and determined its effects given the available level of evidence supporting the ERAS protocol in children.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review including series providing adoption of fast-track recovery protocols for pediatric urology procedures was carried out. Main outcome measures were study characteristics, adherence to the 19 ERAS items, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Sub-group analysis by surgery type (hypospadias versus major surgery) was performed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Nine series with data from 1272 surgical pediatric cases were included. An enhanced recovery pathway was applied in 67.3% of the reports. Two series included patients undergoing hypospadias repair and ERAS items were insufficiently reported. Studies including children undergoing major procedures mentioned a median of 15 ERAS items, yet applied a median of 11 items. Median compliance rate was 88.9% (range 50-100). More ERAS guideline items were reported (applied or mentioned) in the most recently published studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited reporting and use of the ERAS guidelines in urologic surgery particularly in hypospadias repair; whilst in major surgery in children, adherence and compliance rates vary widely. In more recent series there was an increase in ERAS items that have been mentioned and applied. Future research is needed to identify barriers and to overcome them in order to fully adopt and benefit from the ERAS pathway.

A systematic review & meta-analysis comparing outcomes of endoscopic treatment of primary vesico ureteric reflux in children with polyacrylate poly alcohol copolymer versus dextranomer hyaluranic acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are conflicting reports on the efficacy of bulking agents for vesico ureteric reflux (VUR). In this meta-analysis we have compared the outcomes of endoscopic treatment with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer hyaluronic acid (DxHA).

METHODS

A systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2020 was conducted covering databases like PUBMED, MEDLINE etc. for (endoscopic treatment) AND (VUR) AND (PPC OR DxHA) AND (recurrence OR complications). PRISMA guidelines were followed and only comparative studies were included. Outcomes were early success defined as absence of VUR in voiding cystourethrogram at 3-months followup, urinary tract infections (UTI) and occurrence of vesico-ureteric-junction obstruction (VUJO). Risk of bias was analysed with Robvis tool and odds-ratios were compared with Revman-3.0.

RESULTS

Among nine studies (heterogeneity; I 2 69-79%) all cleared the risk of bias assessment. There was no significant difference in high grade VUR (p = 0.94) between PPC (40%) and DxHA (43%). Success rate after single injection was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) at 86% (477/555) for PPC vs 69% (474/685) for DxHA. UTI rate between PPC (12%) and DxHA (14.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.54). VUJO rate between PPC (3.9%) and DxHA (0.8%) was also not significantly different (p = 0.47). Significantly lesser volume (p = 0.02) was used for PPC (0.7 ml) compared to DxHA (0.9 ml).

CONCLUSION

Reflux resolution was significantly higher with PPC than DxHA. Postinjection UTI/VUJO incidence was not significantly different between them. Limitation of this meta-analysis was heterogeneity & small number of articles. Further studies should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Assessment of Clinical Failure after Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation: A Multi-Center Study

We aimed to develop and validate a scoring system as an objective assessment tool for predicting clinical failure after pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. Data for this multi-institutional retrospective cohort was obtained from two tertiary referral hospitals. We defined clinical failure as incomplete radiographic resolution or post-operative febrile UTI. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups according to the score. External validation was performed using the model projected to the external validation cohort. An amount of 115 renal units in the development cohort and 46 renal units in the validation cohort were analyzed. The prediction score was calculated with weighted points to each variable according to their regression coefficient as age (year) + BMI + BBD times 10 + VUR grade times 7 + console time (h) + hospital stay times 6. The C-index of our scoring system was 0.850 and 0.770 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Clinical failure was significantly different among risk groups: 0% (low-risk), 3.3% (intermediate-risk), and 22.2% (high-risk) (p = 0.004) in the development cohort. A novel scoring system using multiple pre- and intra-operative variables provides a prediction of children at risk of failure after robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation.