Native thiol decreases in patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, especially in the presence of surgery indication

The prevalence of primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism and its cardiometabolic implications in primary aldosteronism

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), and its implication on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with PA (exposed cohort, N.=44) and all hypertensive (EH) patients with adrenal lesions without PA nor other adrenal hypersecretion (non-exposed cohort, N.=41) on follow-up at our center between 2016 and 2020.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients with PA and EH was 55.1±14.13 and 66.3±10.93 (P<0.001), and 50% of PA and 39.0% of EH were women (P=0.309). At diagnosis, the prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism in PA was of 18.2%, and all were normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism cases. Globally, no differences were found in the prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism compared to EH (18.2% vs. 29.3%, P=0.229), but hypercalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism was significantly more prevalent in EH patients than in PA (22.0% vs. 0%, P=0.001). There were 47.7% (N.=21) cases of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with PA (4 due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and vitamin D deficiency, and 17 due to vitamin D deficiency alone). The cardiometabolic profile of patients with PA and hyperparathyroidism (N.=29) was similar to of those patients without hyperparathyroidism (N.=15) at diagnosis and after a median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range 1.1-5.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Although primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism are common in patients with PA, their prevalence was similar than the observed in EH patients. Primary hyperparathyroidism is usually mild in PA, appearing as normocalcemic forms. No negative implications of the hyperparathyroidism in the cardiometabolic profile of PA were observed.

Serum Periostin Levels are Significantly Higher in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Closely Related to Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Periostin is an emerging biomarker that plays a role in bone metabolism and may be associated with bone mineral density (BMD). This study is aimed to investigate serum periostin levels in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and its correlation with BMD in these patients.

METHODS

Forty patients with newly diagnosed PHPT without co-morbidities and 30 healthy controls were included. Laboratory tests for the diagnosis of PHPT and serum levels of periostin were measured for all patients. BMD was measured on lumbar spines L1 and L4 by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Serum periostin levels were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Serum periostin levels were significantly higher in patients with PHPT than in healthy controls (p<0.001). Serum periostin levels were also significantly higher (mean 59.7±11.0 ng/mL) in PHPT patients with osteoporosis than those without osteoporosis (p=0.004). In logistic regression analysis, only serum periostin levels independently predicted the patients with osteoporosis. According to this analysis, every 1 ng/mL increase in serum periostin increased the risk of having osteoporosis by 20.6%. When the cut-off for serum periostin level was 49.75 ng/mL, the patients with osteoporosis were predicted with 71.4% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity. Multivariate regression analysis revealed a negative correlation between serum periostin levels and L1-L4 T scores on DEXA.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to determine that serum periostin levels are higher in PHPT patients than those without PHPT and to demonstrate a significant association between serum periostin levels and T scores on DEXA in patients with PHPT. These findings will aid in detecting osteoporosis in patients with PHPT and making the decision for surgery in PHPT patients with no need for DEXA imaging that involves radiation.