Current concepts in treatment of early knee osteoarthritis and osteochondral lesions; the role of biological augmentations

The treatment of knee cartilage lesions: state of the art

The management and repair of knee cartilage lesions currently represents a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Identifiable causes are the characteristics of the involved tissues themselves and the presence of poor vascularization, which is responsible for overall reduced repair capacity. The literature reports three types of cartilage lesions' treatment modalities: chondroprotection, chondroreparation and chondrogeneration. The preference for one or the other therapeutic option depends on the pattern of the lesion and the clinical conditions of the patient. Each treatment technique is distinguished by the quality of the restorative tissue that is generated. In particular, the chondrorigeneration represents the last frontier of regenerative medicine, as it aims at the complete restoration of natural cartilage. However, the most recent literature documents good results only in the short and medium terms. In recent years the optimization of chondroregeneration outcomes is based on the modification of the scaffolds and the search for new chondrocyte sources, in order to guarantee satisfactory long-term results.

Evaluation of cartilage biomechanics and knee joint microenvironment after different cell-based treatments in a sheep model of early osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Aiming to prevent cartilage damage during early osteoarthritis (OA), the therapeutic challenge is to restore and maintain the physiological and functional properties of such a tissue with minimally invasive therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Accordingly, an in vivo model of early OA in sheep was here treated through three different cell therapies (culture expanded ADSCs, SVF, and culture expanded AECs) thus to preserve the joint surface from the progression of the pathology. Three months after the treatment injections, their performance was assessed through mechanical automated mapping (Young's modulus and cartilage thickness), gross evaluation of articular surfaces, and biochemical analysis of the synovial fluid.

RESULTS

No severe degeneration was observed after three months from OA induction. Cartilage mechanical properties were crucial to identify early degeneration. All the treatments improved the macroscopic cartilage surface aspect and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines in the synovial fluid. Among the three treatments, SVF highlighted the best performance while ADSCs the worst.

CONCLUSION

Despite that the evaluated experimental time is an early follow-up and, thus, longer trial is mandatory to properly assess treatments effectiveness, the proposed multidisciplinary approach allowed to obtain preliminary, but also crucial, results concerning the reduction in OA signs on cartilage properties, in osteophyte development and in all the inflammatory markers.