Assessment of body fluid in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy

Volume control strategy and patient survival in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial with secondary analysis

Optimal strategy for volume control and the clinical implication of achieved volume control are unknown in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the survival according to conventional or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided volume control strategy in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT. We also compared patient survival according to achieved volume accumulation rate ([cumulative fluid balance during 3 days × 100]/fluid overload measured by BIA at enrollment) as a post-hoc analysis. We randomly assigned patients to conventional volume control strategy (n = 39) or to BIA-guided volume control strategy (n = 34). There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.63-2.23) or 90-day mortality (HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.57-1.75) between conventional and BIA-guided volume control group. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was significantly associated with patient survival. Compared with the achieved volume accumulation rate of ≤  - 50%, the HRs (95% CIs) for the risk of 90-day mortality were 1.21 (0.29-5.01), 0.55 (0.12-2.48), and 7.18 (1.58-32.51) in that of  - 50-0%, 1-50%, and > 50%, respectively. Hence, BIA-guided volume control in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT did not improve patient outcomes. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was associated with patient survival.

Association between volume status assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis, lung ultrasound, or weight change and mortality in patients with sepsisassociated acute kidney injury receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Fluid overload is an independent risk factor of mortality in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). However, the association between fluid status, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or lung ultrasound, and survival in patients with AKI requiring CKRT has not been established.

METHODS

We analyzed 36 participants with sepsis-associated AKI who received CKRT at a tertiary hospital. The main exposures were volume surrogates: 1) overhydration normalized by extracellular water (OH/ECW, L/L) assessed by BIA, 2) the number of B-lines measured by lung ultrasound, and 3) weight change ([body weight at CKRT initiation - body weight at admission] × 100/body weight at admission). The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants (47.2%) died within 28 days. There were no significant correlations between OH/ECW and weight change (R2 = 0.040, p = 0.24), number of B-lines and OH/ECW (R2 = 0.056, p = 0.16), or weight change and number of B-lines (R2 = 0.014, p = 0.49). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that patients in the highest tertile of OH/ECW showed a significantly lower cumulative 28-day survival probability than the others (the lowest + middle tertiles). The survival probability of participants in the highest tertile of the number of B-lines or weight change did not differ from that of their counterparts. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, the hazard ratio for the highest tertile of OH/ECW was 3.83 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-14.03).

CONCLUSION

Volume overload assessed using BIA (OH/ECW) was associated with the 28-day survival rate in patients with sepsis-associated AKI who received CKRT.

Effect of Blood Flow Rate on the Accuracy of Central Venous Pressure Measurement during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to study the influence of extracorporeal blood flow rate (BFR) on the accuracy of central venous pressure (CVP) measurement during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly divided into 3 groups based on the location of catheters used for their CRRT and CVP measurement. CVP levels measured at increased extracorporeal BFR (from 0 to 300 mL/min) in the normal and reverse positions of inlet and outlet lines connected to the CV catheter (CVC) in the course of the CRRT session were collected.

RESULTS

CVP levels measured at different extracorporeal BFRs did not significantly differ between and among the 3 groups. Inversion of inlet and outlet lines connected to the catheters did not affect the accuracy of CVP measurement. BFR had a negative correlation with inflow/access pressure but a positive correlation with outflow/return pressure. Neither inflow pressure nor outflow pressure was correlated with CVP.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal BFR has no influence on the accuracy of CVP measurement during CRRT with the net machine balance adjusted to zero regardless of the location of the catheter and the connection method between catheters and CRRT lines. Thus, CRRT does not need to be discontinued to obtain an accurate CVP measurement.