Is solvent/detergent plasma better than standard fresh-frozen plasma? A systematic review and an expert consensus document

Plasma Exchange Therapy Using Solvent Detergent-Treated Plasma: An Observational Pilot Study on Complement, Neutrophil and Endothelial Cell Activation in a Case Series of Patients Suffering from Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Introduction

Plasma exchange therapy (PEX) was standard treatment for thrombotic microangiopathy before eculizumab was available and is still widely applied. However, most PEX patients still ultimately progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It has been suggested that infusion of plasma that contains active complement may induce additional complement activation with subsequent activation of neutrophils and endothelial cells, leading to exacerbation of organ damage and deterioration of renal function.

Objective

This observational pilot study examines the effect of hemodialysis, eculizumab and PEX before and after treatment in plasma of aHUS patients on complement-, neutrophil and endothelial cell activation.

Methods

Eleven patients were included in this pilot study. Six patients were treated with hemodialysis, 2 patients received regular infusions of eculizumab, and 3 patients were on a regular schedule for PEX. Patients were followed during 3 consecutive treatments. Blood samples were taken before and after patients received their treatment.

Results

Complement activation products increased in plasma of patients after PEX, as opposed to patients treated with hemodialysis or eculizumab. Increased levels of complement activation products were detected in omniplasma used for PEX. Additionally, activation of neutrophils and endothelial cells was observed in patients after hemodialysis and PEX, but not in patients receiving eculizumab treatment.

Conclusion

In this pilot study we observed that PEX induced complement and neutrophil activation, and that omniplasma contains significant amounts of complement activation products. Additionally, we demonstrate that hemodialysis induces activation of neutrophils and endothelial cells. Complement activation with subsequent neutrophil activation may contribute to the deterioration of organ function and may result in ESRD. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted to investigate the effect of PEX on complement- and neutrophil activation in patients with thrombotic microangiopathy.

Emergency Blood Transfusion for Trauma and Perioperative Resuscitation: Standard of Care

Uncontrolled and massive bleeding with derangement of coagulation is a major challenge in the management of both surgical and seriously injured patients. The underlying mechanism of trauma-induced or -associated coagulopathy is tissue injury in the presence of shock and acidosis provoking endothelial damage, activation of inflammation, and coagulation disbalancing. Furthermore, the combination of ongoing blood loss and consumption of blood components that are essential for effective coagulation worsens uncontrolled hemorrhage. Additionally, therapeutic actions, such as resuscitation with replacement fluids or allogeneic blood products, can further aggravate coagulopathy. Of the coagulation factors essential to the clotting process, fibrinogen is the first to be consumed to critical levels during acute bleeding and current evidence suggests that normalizing fibrinogen levels in bleeding patients improves clot formation and clot strength, thereby controlling hemorrhage. Three different therapeutic approaches are discussed controversially. Whole blood transfusion is used especially in the military scenario and is also becoming more and more popular in the civilian world, although it is accompanied by a strong lack of evidence and severe safety issues. Transfusion of allogeneic blood concentrates in fixed ratios without any targets has been investigated extensively with disappointing results. Individualized and target-controlled coagulation management based on point-of-care diagnostics with respect to the huge heterogeneity of massive bleeding situations is an alternative and advanced approach to managing coagulopathy associated with massive bleeding in the trauma as well as the perioperative setting.

Transfusion in the mechanically ventilated patient

Red blood cell transfusions are a frequent intervention in critically ill patients, including in those who are receiving mechanical ventilation. Both these interventions can impact negatively on lung function with risks of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and other forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The interactions between transfusion, mechanical ventilation, TRALI and ARDS are complex and other patient-related (e.g., presence of sepsis or shock, disease severity, and hypervolemia) or blood product-related (e.g., presence of antibodies or biologically active mediators) factors also play a role. We propose several strategies targeted at these factors that may help limit the risks of associated lung injury in critically ill patients being considered for transfusion.

The Swedish Scandinavian donations and transfusions database (SCANDAT3-S) - 50 years of donor and recipient follow-up

Background

The two previous versions of the Scandinavian donations and transfusions (SCANDAT) databases, encompassing data on blood donors, blood components, transfusions, and transfused patients linked to national health registers in Sweden and Denmark up until 2012, have been used to study donor health, disease transmission, the role of donor characteristics, and more.

Study Design and Methods

Here we describe the creation of the Swedish portion of the third iteration of SCANDAT – SCANDAT3‐S – with follow‐up from 1968 to the end of 2017, resulting in up to 50 years of uninterrupted follow‐up for donors and recipients. The database now also includes non‐transfused non‐donors with a blood typing result, increased temporal resolution for transfusions, and linkages to laboratory and drug prescription data.

Results

After data cleaning, the database contained 23 579 863 donation records, 21 383 317 transfusion records, and 8 071 066 unique persons with valid identification. In total, the database offers 28 638 436 person‐years of follow‐up for donors, 13 582 350 person‐years of follow‐up for transfusion recipients, and 65 613 639 person‐years of follow‐up for non‐recipient non‐donors, with possibility for future extension. Additionally, the database includes 167 820 412 dispense records for prescribed drugs and 316,338,442 laboratory test results. Since the latest update in 2012, >99.9% of all donations were traceable to a donor with valid identification, and >97% of all transfusions to a recipient with valid identification.

Conclusion

With extended follow‐up and more clinical detail, the Swedish portion of the third and latest iteration of the SCANDAT database should allow for more comprehensive analysis of donation and transfusion‐related research questions.

Transition from fresh frozen plasma to solvent/detergent plasma in the Netherlands: comparing clinical use and transfusion reaction risks

Plasma transfusion is indicated for replenishment of coagulative proteins to stop or prevent bleeding. In 2014, the Netherlands switched from using ~300mL fresh frozen plasma (FFP) units to using 200mL Omniplasma, a solvent/detergent treated pooled plasma (SD plasma), units. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of SD plasma on clinical plasma use, associated bleeding, and transfusion reaction incidences. Using diagnostic data from six Dutch hospitals, national blood bank data, and national hemovigilance data for 2011 to 2017, we compared the plasma/red blood cell (RBC) units ratio (f) and the mean number of plasma and RBC units transfused for FFP (~300mL) and SD plasma (200mL) for various patient groups, and calculated odds ratios comparing their associated transfusion reaction risks. Analyzing 13,910 transfusion episodes, the difference (Δf = f_{SD -} f_FFP) in mean plasma/RBC ratio (f) was negligible (Δf_{entire_cohort} = 0.01 [95% confidence interval (CI): −0.02 - 0.05]; P=0.48). SD plasma was associated with fewer RBC units transfused per episode in gynecological (difference of mean number of units −1.66 [95% CI: −2.72, −0.61]) and aneurysm (−0.97 [−1.59, −0.35]) patients. SD plasma was further associated with fewer anaphylactic reactions than FFP (odds ratio 0.37 [0.18, 0.77; P<0.01]) while the differences for most transfusion reactions were not statistically significant. SD plasma units, despite being one third smaller in volume than FFP units, are not associated with a higher plasma/RBC ratio. SD plasma is associated with fewer anaphylactic reactions than FFP plasma/RBC units ratio.

Cost-utility and budget impact of methylene blue-treated plasma compared to quarantine plasma

BACKGROUND

Methylene blue and visible light treatment and quarantine are two methods used to reduce adverse events, mostly infections, associated with the transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma. The objective of this study was to estimate and compare the budget impact and cost-utility of these two methods from a payer's perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A budget impact and cost-utility model simulating the risks of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, cytomegalovirus, a West Nile virus-like infection, allergic reactions and febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions achieved using plasma treated with methylene blue and visible light (MBP) and quarantine plasma (QP) was constructed for Spain. QP costs were estimated using data from one blood centre in Spain and published literature. The costs of producing fresh-frozen plasma from whole blood, apheresis plasma, and multicomponent apheresis, and separately for passive and active methods of donor recall for QP were included. Costs and outcomes over a 5-year and lifetime time horizon were estimated.

RESULTS

Compared to passive QP, MBP led to a net increase of € 850,352, and compared to active QP, MBP led to a net saving of € 5,890,425 over a 5-year period. Compared to passive QP, MBP increased the cost of fresh-frozen plasma per patient by € 7.21 and had an incremental cost-utility ratio of € 705,126 per quality-adjusted life-year. Compared to active QP, MBP reduced cost by € 50.46 per patient and was more effective.

DISCUSSION

Plasma collection method and quarantine approach had the strongest influence on the budget impact and cost-utility of MBP. If QP relies on plasma from whole blood collection and passive quarantine, it is less costly than MBP. However, MPB was estimated to be more effective than QP in all analyses.