B-type natriuretic peptide: time to incorporate natriuretic peptides in our practice

Predictors of Left Ventricular Remodeling Post Acute Myocardial Infarction. Protocol for a Clinical Study

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome that appears as a consequence of a structural disease, and the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction results from myocardial ischemia. Cardiac remodeling and neuroendocrine activation are the major compensatory mechanisms in heart failure. The main objective of the study is to identify the association between serum biomarkers illustrating the extent of myocardial necrosis (highly sensitive troponin as-says), left ventricular dysfunction (NT-proBNP), and systemic inflammatory response (illustrated via serum levels of hsCRP and interleukins) during the acute phase of a myocardial infarction, and the left ventricular remodeling process at 6 months following the acute event, quantified via speckle tracking echocardiography. The study will include 400 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction without signs and symptoms of heart failure at the time of enrollment that will undergo a complex clinical examination and speckle tracking echocardiography. Serum samples from the peripheral blood will be collected in order to determine the inflammatory serum biomarkers. After 6 months, patients will be divided into 2 groups according to the development of ventricular remodeling, quantified by speckle tracking echocardiography: group 1 will consist of patients with a remodeling index lower than 15%, and group 2 will consist of patients with a remodeling index higher than 15%. All clinical and imaging data obtained at the baseline will be compared between these two groups in order to determine the features associated with a higher risk of deleterious ventricular remodeling and heart failure.

Review on natriuretic peptides: where we are, where we are going

BACKGROUND

Tremendous advances have been made in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of congestive heart failure. However, diagnosis of the disease still remains difficult, even with a comprehensive physical examination. Symptoms such as dyspnea are nonspecific and insensitive indicators for heart failure, which can go largely undetected. Several studies have suggested the need for new diagnostic capabilities, especially with the increasing prevalence of heart failure in the US. The discovery of natriuretic peptides as diagnostic biomarkers has been one of the most critical advances for the management of heart failure. Both B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide have the potential to diagnose heart failure, assess prognostic risk of rehospitalization and mortality, and even help guide treatment. Their relative cost-effectiveness and availability have also facilitated their acceptance into many emergency departments, clinics and in-patient units as standard care when evaluating patients with suspected heart failure. Our understanding of the natriuretic peptide system is still in its infancy, but natriuretic peptides have emerged as important diagnostic and prognostic tools that have generated interest in finding broader applications for their use.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to discuss the clinical approaches and future applications of natriuretic peptides in diagnosing and managing treatment of congestive heart failure.

METHOD

A comprehensive review of studies to assess the utility of natriuretic peptides for diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure and other conditions.

CONCLUSION

Natriuretic peptides are powerful tools to aid the physician in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of heart failure in both in-patient and out-patient settings. However, natriuretic peptides should be used as an adjunct test as many circumstances can also influence changes in natriuretic peptide levels.

Natriuretic Peptides and Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Asymptomatic Persons

Current tools for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment in asymptomatic individuals are imperfect. Preventive measures aimed only at individuals deemed high risk by current algorithms neglect large numbers of low-risk and intermediate-risk individuals who are destined to develop CVD and who would benefit from early and aggressive treatment. Natriuretic peptides have the potential both to identify individuals at risk for future cardiovascular events and to help detect subclinical CVD. Choosing the appropriate subpopulation to target for natriuretic peptide testing will help maximize the performance and the cost effectiveness. The combined use of multiple risk markers, including biomarkers, genetic testing, and imaging or other noninvasive measures of risk, offers promise for further refining risk assessment algorithms. Recent studies have highlighted the utility of natriuretic peptides for preoperative risk stratification; however, cost effectiveness and outcomes studies are needed to affirm this and other uses of natriuretic peptides for cardiovascular risk assessment in asymptomatic individuals.

State of the art: using natriuretic peptide levels in clinical practice

Natriuretic peptide (NP) levels (B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP) are now widely used in clinical practice and cardiovascular research throughout the world and have been incorporated into most national and international cardiovascular guidelines for heart failure. The role of NP levels in state-of-the-art clinical practice is evolving rapidly. This paper reviews and highlights ten key messages to clinicians: 1) NP levels are quantitative plasma biomarkers of heart failure (HF). 2) NP levels are accurate in the diagnosis of HF. 3) NP levels may help risk stratify emergency department (ED) patients with regard to the need for hospital admission or direct ED discharge. 4) NP levels help improve patient management and reduce total treatment costs in patients with acute dyspnoea. 5) NP levels at the time of admission are powerful predictors of outcome in predicting death and re-hospitalisation in HF patients. 6) NP levels at discharge aid in risk stratification of the HF patient. 7) NP-guided therapy may improve morbidity and/or mortality in chronic HF. 8) The combination of NP levels together with symptoms, signs and weight gain assists in the assessment of clinical decompensation in HF. 9) NP levels can accelerate accurate diagnosis of heart failure presenting in primary care. 10) NP levels may be helpful to screen for asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in high-risk patients.