Coordinate release of angiogenic growth factors after acute myocardial infarction: evidence of a two-wave production

Angiogenesis induction as a key step in cardiac tissue Regeneration: From angiogenic agents to biomaterials

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. After myocardial infarction, the vascular supply of the heart is damaged or blocked, leading to the formation of scar tissue, followed by several cardiac dysfunctions or even death. In this regard, induction of angiogenesis is considered as a vital process for supplying nutrients and oxygen to the cells in cardiac tissue engineering. The current review aims to summarize different approaches of angiogenesis induction for effective cardiac tissue repair. Accordingly, a comprehensive classification of induction of pro-angiogenic signaling pathways through using engineered biomaterials, drugs, angiogenic factors, as well as combinatorial approaches is introduced as a potential platform for cardiac regeneration application. The angiogenic induction for cardiac repair can enhance patient treatment outcomes and generate economic prospects for the biomedical industry. The development and commercialization of angiogenesis methods often involves collaboration between academic institutions, research organizations, and biomedical companies.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Myocardial Infarction

The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) increases every year worldwide. Better diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for clinical applications are the consistent pursuit of MI research. In addition to electrocardiogram, echocardiography, coronary angiography, etc., circulating biomarkers are essential for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment effect monitoring of MI patients. In this review, we assessed both strength and weakness of MI circulating biomarkers including: (1) originated from damaged myocardial tissues including current golden standard cardiac troponin, (2) released from non-myocardial tissues due to MI-induced systems reactions, and (3) preexisted in blood circulation before the occurrence of MI event. We also summarized newly reported MI biomarkers. We proposed that the biomarkers preexisting in blood circulation before MI incidents should be emphasized in research and development for MI prevention in near future.

VEGF-A plasma levels are associated with microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Microvascular obstruction (MVO) is associated with poor outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) is a vascular permeability inducer playing a key role in MVO pathogenesis. We aimed to assess whether VEGF-A levels are associated with MVO, when evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in STEMI patients.

METHODS

The multicenter prospective PREGICA study included a CMR substudy with all consecutive patients with a first STEMI who had undergone cardiac MRI at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Patients with initial TIMI flow >1 were excluded. VEGF-A levels were measured in blood samples drawn at inclusion.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2017, 147 patients (mean age 57 ± 10 years; 84% males) were included. MVO was present in 65 (44%) patients. After multivariate analysis, higher troponin peak (OR 1.005; 95% CI 1.001-1.008; p = 0.007) and VEGF-A levels (OR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.005; p = 0.015) were independently associated with MVO. When considering only patients with successful percutaneous coronary intervention (final TIMI flow 3, n = 130), higher troponin peak (p = 0.004) and VEGF-A levels (p = 0.03) remained independently predictive of MVO. Moreover, MVO was associated with adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and VEGF-A levels were significantly and inversely correlated with LV ejection fraction (EF) at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that VEGF-A levels were independently associated with MVO during STEMI and correlated with mid-term LVEF alteration. VEGF-A could therefore be considered as a biomarker of MVO in STEMI patients and be used to stratify patient prognosis.

Prognostic value of angiopoietin-2 for patients with coronary heart disease after elective PCI

Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) frequently have cardiovascular complications after undergoing PCI. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is an important proangiogenic factor that also plays an important role in atherosclerosis. This study aimed to evaluate the value of Ang-2 in predicting cardiovascular events after elective PCI.This prospective study enrolled 97 patients with CHD who underwent elective PCI from 2013 to 2014. Blood samples were collected in the first morning after admission and within 24 to 48 h after PCI. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction/repeat revascularization, readmission for severe deterioration of angina and readmission for new onset heart failure. Based on the median level of pre-PCI or post-PCI Ang-2, the patients were divided into a low level group and a high level group.During the whole follow-up period (mean, 53 ± 13 months), Kaplan-Meier curves of cardiovascular events showed that there was no significant difference between the two pre-PCI groups (χ = 2.22, P = .137, and log-rank test) or the two post-PCI groups (χ = 2.83, P = .093, and log-rank test). However, in a multivariable Cox regression model, landmark analysis showed that the patients in high level group of post-PCI, not pre-PCI, were associated with remarkable higher risks of cardiovascular events compared to the low level group during the first 1.5 years of follow-up (adjusted HR = 9.99, 95%CI = 1.99-50.13, P = .005). However, that was of no significance from 1.5 years to maximum follow-up years (adjusted HR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.26-2.59, P = .733).High Ang-2 levels of post-PCI can predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events in the short to medium term.

Effects of timing on intracoronary autologous bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Several cell-based therapies for adjunctive treatment of acute myocardial infarction have been investigated in multiple clinical trials, but the timing of transplantation remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effects of timing on bone marrow-derived cell (BMC) therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Evidence-Based Medicine databases from January 2000 to June 2017 was performed on randomized controlled trials with at least a 3-month follow-up for patients with AMI undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and receiving intracoronary BMC transfer thereafter. The defined end points were left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic index. The data were analyzed to evaluate the effects of timing on BMC therapy.

Results

Thirty-four RCTs comprising a total of 2,307 patients were included; the results show that, compared to the control group, AMI patients who received BMC transplantation showed significantly improved cardiac function. BMC transplantation 3–7 days after PCI (+3.32%; 95% CI, 1.91 to 4.74; P < 0.00001) resulted in a significant increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). As for the inhibitory effect on ventricular remodeling, BMC transplantation 3–7 days after PCI reduced LV end-diastolic indexes (–4.48; 95% CI, −7.98 to –0.98; P = 0.01) and LV end-systolic indexes (–6.73; 95% CI, –11.27 to –2.19; P = 0.004). However, in the groups who received BMC transplantation either within 24 hours or later than 7 days there was no significant effect on treatment outcome. In subgroup analysis, the group with LVEF ≤ 50% underwent a significant decrease in LV end-diastolic index after BMC transplantation (WMD = –3.29, 95% CI, –4.49 to –2.09; P < 0.00001); the decrease was even more remarkable in the LV end-systolic index after BMC transplantation in the group with LVEF ≤ 50% (WMD = –5.25, 95% CI, –9.30 to –1.20; P = 0.01), as well as in patients who received a dose of 10^7–10^8 cells (WMD = –12.99, 95% CI, –19.07 to –6.91; P < 0.0001). In the group with a follow-up of more than 12 months, this beneficial effect was significant and increased to a more pronounced effect of +3.58% (95% CI, 1.55 to 5.61; P = 0.0006) when compared with control.

Conclusions

In this meta-analysis, BMC transfer at 3 to 7 days post-AMI was superior to transfer within 24 hours or more than 7 days after AMI in improving LVEF and decreasing LV end-systolic dimensions or LV end-diastolic dimensions. It is more effective in patients with lower baseline LVEF (≤50%) and the effect can last more than 12 months.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0680-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Serum Angiopoietin-2 in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Background:

Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) plays a crucial role in hypoxia-induced angiogenesis and is expressed only in sites of vascular remodeling. Ang-2 expression can be regulated by hypoxia inducible factors and other regulators with exposure to hypoxia. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on serum Ang-2 concentrations, and analyze the correlation between serum Ang-2 and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Methods:

Sixty-four patients with CHD were selected as the study group, each undergone PCI. Thirty-two healthy subjects were selected as the control group. Pre-PCI and post-PCI serum Ang-2 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The severity of coronary artery stenosis was evaluated using angiographic Gensini scores, and the coronary collateral vessels were scored according to Rentrop's classification.

Results:

Concentrations of pre-PCI serum Ang-2 in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (4625.06 ± 1838.06 vs. 1945.74 ± 1588.17 pg/ml, P < 0.01); however, concentrations of post-PCI serum Ang-2 were significantly lower than those of pre-PCI (3042.63 ± 1845.33 pg/ml vs. 4625.06 ± 1838.06 pg/ml, P < 0.01). Concentrations of pre-PCI serum Ang-2 were significantly correlated with Gensini scores (r = 0.488, P < 0.01); however, the decrease in serum Ang-2 after PCI was not correlated with Gensini scores, coronary collateral vessel grading, or left ventricular ejection fraction.

Conclusions:

Serum Ang-2 concentrations significantly increased in patients with CHD, and PCI treatment significantly decreased these concentrations. Serum Ang-2 concentrations, but not the decrease in serum Ang-2 concentrations, were significantly correlated with the severity of coronary artery stenosis. These results suggested that Ang-2 may be a biomarker of myocardial ischemia and vessel remodeling.

The no-reflow phenomenon: State of the art

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the best available reperfusion strategy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with nearly 95% of occluded coronary vessels being reopened in this setting. Despite re-establishing epicardial coronary vessel patency, primary PCI may fail to restore optimal myocardial reperfusion within the myocardial tissue, a failure at the microvascular level known as no-reflow (NR). NR has been reported to occur in up to 60% of STEMI patients with optimal coronary vessel reperfusion. When it does occur, it significantly attenuates the beneficial effect of reperfusion therapy, leading to poor outcomes. The pathophysiology of NR is complex and incompletely understood. Many phenomena are known to contribute to NR, including leukocyte infiltration, vasoconstriction, activation of inflammatory pathways and cellular oedema. Vascular damage and haemorrhage may also play important roles in the establishment of NR. In this review, we describe the pathophysiological mechanisms of NR and the tools available for diagnosing it. We also describe the microvasculature and the endothelial mechanisms involved in NR, which may provide relevant therapeutic targets for reducing NR and improving the prognosis for patients.

The effect of bone marrow mononuclear stem cell therapy on left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow stem cell (BMC) transfer is an emerging therapy with potential to salvage cardiomyocytes during acute myocardial infarction and promote regeneration and endogenous repair of damaged myocardium in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the association between administration of BMC and LV functional recovery as assessed by imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included data from 32 trials comprising information on 1,300 patients in the treatment arm and 1,006 patients in the control arm. Overall, BMC therapy was associated with a significant increase in LV ejection fraction by 4.6% ± 0.7% (P < .001) (control-adjusted increase of 2.8% ± 0.9%, P = .001), and a significant decrease in perfusion defect size by 9.5% ± 1.4% (P < .001) (control-adjusted decrease of 3.8% ± 1.2%, P = .002). The effect of BMC therapy was similar whether the cells were administered via intra-coronary or intra-myocardial routes and was not influenced by baseline ejection fraction or perfusion defect size.

CONCLUSIONS

BMC transfer appears to have a positive impact on LV recovery in patients with acute coronary syndrome and those with stable coronary disease with or without heart failure. Most studies were small and a minority used a core laboratory for image analysis.

Dynamic changes in serum angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, and angiopoietin-2/angiopoietin-1 ratio in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

CONTEXT

Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) play divergent roles in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate serum Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Serum Ang-1 and Ang-2 were measured in 85 STEMI patients in the first week after PCI.

RESULTS

Ang-1, Ang-2 and Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio (Ang-2/1) were all increased at admission, and had dynamic changes after PCI. Ang-2 and Ang-2/1 at admission and 2 h after PCI were positively correlated with peak cardiac troponin T levels.

CONCLUSION

The extent of myocardial damage may be linked to circulating Ang-2 and Ang-2/1.

The extent of irreversible myocardial damage and the potential for left ventricular repair after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently recognized as a highly effective therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and has been shown to decrease myocardial damage and improve prognosis. Several diagnostic tools have been proposed to evaluate the myocardium at risk, the occurrence of no-reflow, the final scar size, and the presence of residual viable myocardium in patients treated by primary PCI. A large body of literature documents the relevant impact of each of these variables on outcomes in patients treated for AMI. In patients undergoing primary PCI, a number of treatment approaches have been proposed recently to improve efficacy by increasing myocardial salvage. This article describes the principal diagnostic tools (ie, serum biochemical markers, electrocardiography, echocardiography, nuclear imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging, and multidetector computed tomography) applicable for evaluation of the size and severity of myocardial damage in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI. Proposed therapeutic strategies to repair irreversible myocardial damage in patients treated with primary PCI are also considered, with particular focus on the value of stem cell therapy in this specific setting.

Human endothelial stem/progenitor cells, angiogenic factors and vascular repair

Neovascularization or new blood vessel formation is of utmost importance not only for tissue and organ development and for tissue repair and regeneration, but also for pathological processes, such as tumour development. Despite this, the endothelial lineage, its origin, and the regulation of endothelial development and function either intrinsically from stem cells or extrinsically by proangiogenic supporting cells and other elements within local and specific microenvironmental niches are still not fully understood. There can be no doubt that for most tissues and organs, revascularization represents the holy grail for tissue repair, with autologous endothelial stem/progenitor cells, their proangiogenic counterparts and the products of these cells all being attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. Historically, a great deal of controversy has surrounded the identification and origin of cells and factors that contribute to revascularization, the use of such cells or their products as biomarkers to predict and monitor tissue damage and repair or tumour progression and therapeutic responses, and indeed their efficacy in revascularizing and repairing damaged tissues. Here, we will review the role of endothelial progenitor cells and of supporting proangiogenic cells and their products, principally in humans, as diagnostic and therapeutic agents for wound repair and tissue regeneration.

Efficacy and safety of intracoronary autologous bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from randomized controlled trials with 12 or more months follow-up

BACKGROUND

Until now there was no systematic review concerning the chronic effects of intracoronary bone marrow-derived cell (BMC) transplantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

HYPOTHESIS

Improvement of cardiac function in patients with acute MI post BMC transplantation might last longer than 12 months.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database through June 2009. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of intracoronary BMC transfer in acute MI patients with follow-up duration equal to or longer than 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 8 trials involving 725 participants were identified. Compared with controls, BMC transplantation significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 4.37% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.66%-6.08%; P < 0.00001), reduced left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by 5.71 mL (95% CI: 2.03-9.40 mL; P = 0.002), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) by 8.94 mL (95% CI: 4.22-13.66 mL; P = 0.0002), and infarct size by 2.42% (95% CI: 1.33%-3.51%, P < 0.00001). Bone marrow-derived cell treatment also significantly reduced the risk of death (relative risk [RR]: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.89; P = 0.03), while the risk of reinfarction was similar between the 2 groups (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.09-4.12; P = 0.62). Subgroup analysis showed that the BMC transplantation-induced LVEF increase was more significant in patients age < 55 and with cells transferred 6 or 7 days after MI.

CONCLUSION

Beneficial effects of intracoronary BMC transplantation could last more than 12 months in acute MI patients.

Route of delivery and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, key factors of bone-marrow-derived cell therapy for ischaemic heart disease

AIMS

Previous evaluation of autologous bone-marrow stem-cell (BMSC) therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) suggests that cell dose and timing of stem-cell administration post-MI are important factors in the efficacy of cellular therapy. This study aimed to assess whether route of delivery and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the participants may also affect the outcome of BMSC treatment in patients with AMI and ischaemic heart disease (IHD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials of BMSCs as treatment for AMI and IHD were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Current Controlled Trials Register through to November 2008. Twenty-one trials (25 comparisons) with a total of 1091 participants were eligible. Data were analysed using a random-effects model. Improvement in LVEF in favour of the control was observed when BMSC were administered by intracoronary infusion [-0.19% (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.14; P < 0.00001)] in IHD patients. However, the effect on LVEF was statistically significant and in favour of BMSC when cells were delivered by intra-myocardial injection [5.85% (95% CI, 2.50-9.19; P = 0.0006)]. The significant improvement in LVEF observed in AMI patients was independent from the baseline LVEF of the participants. However, in patients suffering from chronic IHD, increase in LVEF was significant only in the group with lower LVEF at baseline [4.42% (CI, 1.87-6.96; P = 0.0007)].

CONCLUSION

Clinical evidence suggests that route of delivery and baseline LVEF influence the effect of BMSC therapy in treating AMI and chronic IHD.

Vascular endothelial growth factors in cardiovascular medicine

The discovery of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their receptors has considerably improved the understanding of the development and function of endothelial cells. Each member of the VEGF family appears to have a specific function: VEGF-A induces angiogenesis (i.e. growth of new blood vessels from preexisting ones), placental growth factor mediates both angiogenesis and arteriogenesis (i.e. the formation of collateral arteries from preexisting arterioles), VEGF-C and VEGF-D act mainly as lymphangiogenic factors. The study of the biology of these endothelial growth factors has allowed a major progress in the comprehension of the genesis of the vascular system and its abnormalities observed in various pathologic conditions (atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease). The role of VEGF in the atherogenic process is still unclear, but actual evidence suggests both detrimental (development of a neoangiogenetic process within the atherosclerotic plaque) and beneficial (promotion of collateral vessel formation) effects. VEGF and other angiogenic growth factors (fibroblast growth factor), although initially promising in experimental studies and in initial phase I/II clinical trials in patients with ischemic heart disease or peripheral arterial occlusive disease, have subsequently failed to show significant therapeutic improvements in controlled clinical studies. Challenges still remain about the type or the combination of angiogenic factors to be administered, the form (protein vs. gene), the route, and the duration of administration.

Autologous bone marrow stem cells to treat acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review

AIMS

To provide systematic assessment of the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell (BMSC) transplantation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on clinical evidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The search strategy included MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Current Controlled Trials Register through to August 2007 for randomized controlled trials of BMSC treatment for AMI. Thirteen trials (14 comparisons) with a total of 811 participants were included. Data were analysed using a random effects model. Overall, stem cell therapy improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 2.99% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26-4.72%, P = 0.0007], significantly reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) by 4.74 mL (95% CI, -7.84 to -1.64 mL, P = 0.003), and myocardial lesion area by 3.51% (95% CI, -5.91 to -1.11%, P = 0.004) compared with controls. Subgroup analysis revealed that there was statistical significant difference in LEVF in favour of BMSCs when cells were infused within 7 days following AMI and when the BMSC dose administered was higher than 10(8) BMSCs. In addition, there were trends in favour of benefit for most clinical outcomes examined, although it should be acknowledged that the 95%CI included no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Stem cell treatment for AMI still holds promise. Clinically, these data suggest that improvement over conventional therapy can be achieved. Further, adequately powered trials using optimal dosing, longer term outcome assessments, more reliable, and more patient-centred outcomes are required.

Developmental regulation of NO-mediated VEGF-induced effects in the lung

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to have a pivotal role in lung development and in a variety of pathologic conditions in the adult lung. Our earlier studies have shown that NO is a critical mediator of VEGF-induced vascular and extravascular effects in the adult murine lung. As significant differences have been reported in the cytokine responses in the adult versus the neonatal lung, we hypothesized that there may be significant differences in VEGF-induced alterations in the developing as opposed to the mature lung. Furthermore, nitric oxide (NO) mediation of these VEGF-induced effects may be developmentally regulated. Using a novel externally regulatable lung-targeted transgenic murine model, we found that VEGF-induced pulmonary hemorrhage was mediated by NO-dependent mechanisms in adults and newborns. VEGF enhanced surfactant production in adults as well as increased surfactant and lung development in newborns, via an NO-independent mechanism. While the enhanced survival in hyperoxia in the adult was partly NO-dependent, there was enhanced hyperoxia-induced lung injury in the newborn. In addition, human amniotic fluid VEGF levels correlated positively with surfactant phospholipids. Tracheal aspirate VEGF levels had an initial spike, followed by a decline, and then a subsequent rise, in human neonates with an outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. Our data show that VEGF can have injurious as well as potentially beneficial developmental effects, of which some are NO dependent, others NO independent. This opens up the possibility of selective manipulation of any VEGF-based intervention using NO inhibitors for maximal potential clinical benefit.