Initial tadalafil and ambrisentan combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: cLinical and haemodYnamic long-term efficacy (ITALY study)

Contribution of pressure and flow changes to resistance reduction after pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment: a meta-analysis of 3898 patients

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies exert significant haemodynamic changes; however, systematic synthesis is currently lacking.

Methods

We searched PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science for studies evaluating mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), cardiac index/cardiac output (CI/CO) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of PAH-targeted therapies either in monotherapy or combinations as assessed by right heart catheterisation in treatment-naïve PAH patients. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Results

We included 68 studies (90 treatment groups) with 3898 patients (age 47.4±13.2 years, 74% women). In studies with small PVR reduction (<4 WU), CI/CO increase (R2=62%) and not mPAP reduction (R2=24%) was decisive for the PVR reduction (p<0.001 and p=0.36, respectively, in the multivariable meta-regression model); however, in studies with large PVR reduction (>4 WU), both CI/CO increase (R2=72%) and mPAP reduction (R2=35%) contributed significantly to the PVR reduction (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). PVR reduction as a percentage of the pre-treatment value was more pronounced in the oral+prostanoid intravenous/subcutaneous combination therapy (mean difference -50.0%, 95% CI -60.8- -39.2%), compared to oral combination therapy (-41.7%, -47.6- -35.8%), prostanoid i.v./s.c. monotherapy (-31.8%, -37.6- -25.9%) and oral monotherapy (-21.6%, -25.4- -17.8%). Changes in haemodynamic parameters were significantly associated with changes in functional capacity of patients with PAH as expressed by the 6-min walking distance.

Conclusion

Combination therapies, especially with the inclusion of parenteral prostanoids, lead to remarkable haemodynamic improvement in treatment-naïve PAH patients and may unmask the contribution of mPAP reduction to the overall PVR reduction in addition to the increase in CO.

Aggressive Afterload Lowering to Improve the Right Ventricle: A New Target for Medical Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension?

Despite numerous therapeutic advances in pulmonary arterial hypertension, patients continue to suffer high morbidity and mortality, particularly considering a median age of 50 years. This article explores whether early, robust reduction of right ventricular afterload would facilitate substantial improvement in right ventricular function and thus whether afterload reduction should be a treatment goal for pulmonary arterial hypertension. The earliest clinical studies of prostanoid treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension demonstrated an important link between lowering mean pulmonary arterial pressure (or pulmonary vascular resistance) and improved survival. Subsequent studies of oral monotherapy or sequential combination therapy demonstrated smaller reductions in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. More recently, retrospective reports of initial aggressive prostanoid treatment or initial combination oral and parenteral therapy have shown marked afterload reduction along with significant improvements in right ventricular function. Some data suggest that reaching threshold levels for pressure or resistance (components of right ventricular afterload) may be key to interrupting the self-perpetuating injury of pulmonary vascular disease in pulmonary arterial hypertension and could translate into improved long-term clinical outcomes. Based on these clues, the authors postulate that improved clinical outcomes might be achieved by targeting significant afterload reduction with initial oral combination therapy and early parenteral prostanoids.

Advances in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

The management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has significantly evolved over the last decades in the wake of more sensitive diagnostics and specialized clinical programs that can provide focused medical care. In the current era of PAH care, 1-year survival rates have increased to 86%–90% from 65% in the 1980s, and average long-term survival has increased to 6 years from 2.8 years. The heterogeneity in the etiology and disease course has opened doors to focusing research in phenotyping the disease and understanding the pathophysiology at a cellular and genetic level. This may eventually lead to precision medicine and the development of medications that may prevent or reverse pulmonary vascular remodeling. With more insight, clinical trial designs and primary end-points may change to identify the true survival benefit of pharmacotherapy. Identifying responders from non-responders to therapy may help provide individualized patient-centered care rather than an algorithm-based approach. The purpose of this review is to highlight the latest advances in screening, diagnosis, and management of PAH.

Efficacy and safety of novel-targeted drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe and fatal clinical syndrome characterized by high blood pressure and vascular remodeling in the pulmonary arterioles, which is also a rapidly progressing disease of the lung vasculature with a poor prognosis. Although PAH medication made great advances in recent years, the efficacy and safety of the medication are unsatisfactory. Therefore, we aimed to update and expand previous studies to explore the efficacy and safety of PAH-targeted medications. Methods: Relevant articles were searched and selected from published or publicly available data in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE (from inception until October 1^st, 2020). To assess the efficacy and safety of PAH therapies, five efficacy outcomes [6-minute walking distance (6MWD), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), WHO functional class (WHO FC) improvement, clinical worsening, death] and two safety outcomes [adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs)] were selected. And 6MWD was regarded as the primary efficacy outcome.

Results: 50 trials included with 10 996participants were selected. In terms of efficacy, all targeted drugs were more effective than placebo. For 6MWD, Bosentan + Sildenafil, Sildenafil, Bosentan + Iloprost were better than others. Bosentan + Iloprost and Bosentan + Sildenafil were better for mPAP. Bosentan + Iloprost and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil were more effective in improving WHO FC. Bosentan + Tadalafil and Bosentan + Iloprost had the Ambrisentan probability to reduce the incidence of clinical worsening. It is demonstrated that Ambrisentan had clear benefits in reducing all-cause mortality. In terms of safety, no therapies had been shown to reduce the incidence of SAEs significantly, and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil significantly increased the incidence of AEs.

Conclusions: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) + Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERA) seems to be better therapy for PAH. Prostacyclin analogs (ProsA) + ERA appear promising, though additional data is warranted.

Registration PROSPERO CRD42020218818.

Recent advances in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: lessons from the upfront combination of ambrisentan and tadalafil

INTRODUCTION

The sixth World Symposium of Pulmonary Hypertension (sixth WSPH) brought to the forefront for the first time the value of earlier, aggressive management with an upfront oral combination in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) of low or intermediate risk. This was prompted by results from the AMBITION study (ambrisentan + tadalafil). A literature search was conducted to collect all evidence provided by upfront treatment with this combination, as well as other combinations under investigation at the time the manuscript was prepared.

AREAS COVERED

The value of an upfront oral combination with ambrisentan and tadalafil is reviewed on the basis of topics discussed at the sixth WSPH, such as evidence in different PAH etiologies, according to risk stratification and in so-called 'atypical' patients where monotherapy is still recommended. Evidence in clinical practice is also reviewed. New evidence about the value of the upfront oral combination is also commented. Finally, tendencies in primary endpoints to assess the effect of PAH-targeted therapies (time to clinical worsening and hemodynamics) and their value are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

All above-mentioned aspects are put into perspective with regard to the impact of new advances on improving PAH management in clinical practice.

In vivo Pharmacokinetics and in vitro Release of Imatinib Mesylate-Loaded Liposomes for Pulmonary Delivery

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by abnormal proliferation of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells and causes occlusion of pulmonary arterioles that eventually results in right heart failure and death. The platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) plays a prominent role in abnormal remodeling of pulmonary resistance vessels. Imatinib mesylate (IM), a PDGF-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was able to ameliorate PAH by reversing pulmonary vascular remodeling.

METHODS

In the present study, IM-loaded liposomes (IM-LPs) were developed and administered via the pulmonary route to delay the drug release and improve patient compliance for the treatment of PAH. The IM-LPs were prepared by the transmembrane gradient method with the spherical vesicles. The compatibility of the IM-LPs was studied by determining the viability of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs). Particle uptake by rat PASMCs was evaluated by incubating the particles with rat PASMCs. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in male SD rats.

RESULTS

The IM-LPs showed an average size of 101.6 ± 50.80 nm with a zeta potential value of 19.66 ± 0.55 mV, a PDI of 0.250 and 81.96% ± 0.98% drug entrapment efficiency, meanwhile displayed a sustained release profile. Liposomes obviously increased intracellular accumulation of Rhodamine B by PASMCs using the fluorescence microscopic. Following intratracheal administration to rats, IM-LPs not only extended the half-life of IM, but also prolonged retention of IM compared with plain IM solution after intratracheal and intravenous administration.

CONCLUSION

The study show potential applications of the LPs for pulmonary delivery of IM and the method for the development of LPs in sustained release of IM for better therapeutic outcomes. Conclusively, the prepared IM-LPs were well designed in nanosized ranges and may be a promising formulation for pulmonary delivery of IM.

The Growing Role of Echocardiography in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Risk Stratification: The Missing Piece

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive disease with a poor prognosis. The pathophysiologic model is mainly characterized by an afterload mismatch in which an increased right ventricle afterload, driven by increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), leads to right heart failure. International guidelines recommend optimization of treatment based on regular risk assessments to achieve or maintain a low-risk status. Current risk scores are based on a multi-modality approach, including demographic, clinical, functional, exercise, laboratory, and hemodynamic parameters, which lack significant echocardiographic parameters. The originality of echocardiography relies on the opportunity to assess in a non-invasive way a physiologically meaningful combination of easy to measure variables tightly related to right ventricle adaptation/maladaptation to increased afterload, the main determinant of a patient's prognosis. Echo-derived morphological and functional parameters have been investigated in PAH, proving to have prognostic relevance. Different therapeutic strategies proved to have different effects in reducing PVR. An upfront combination of drugs, including a parenteral prostacyclin, has shown to be associated with right heart reverse remodeling in a greater proportion of patients than other treatment strategies as a function of PVR reduction. Adding echocardiographic data to current risk scores would allow better identification of right ventricle (RV) adaptation in PAH patients' follow-up. This additional information would allow better stratification of the patient, leading to optimized and personalized therapeutic management.

Effects of Dual Initial Combination Therapy With Macitentan Plus Riociguat or Macitentan Plus Selexipag on Hemodynamics in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (SETOUCHI-PH Study) - Protocol of a Multicenter Randomized Control Trial

Background: The latest guideline from the European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society recommends initial combination therapy with oral pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific drugs in PAH patients with World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC) II or III. However, whether this initial combination therapy improves hemodynamics and clinical failure events regardless of the combination of PAH-specific drugs remains unknown. This study was designed to evaluate whether the initial combination therapy with macitentan plus riociguat or macitentan plus selexipag showed equal efficacy in reducing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 8 months after administration. Methods and Results: This study is a multicenter randomized control trial. PAH subjects with WHO-FC II or III will be randomized (1 : 1) into initial combination therapy with either macitentan plus riociguat or macitentan plus selexipag, and will be observed 8 months after the initiation of treatment. The primary endpoint will be the difference in the change ratio of PVR from baseline to after 8 months of treatment. Conclusions: The SETOUCHI-PH study will clarify whether initial combination therapy with macitentan plus riociguat or macitentan plus selexipag results in equal reductions in PVR 8 months after administration.

Initial combination therapy of macitentan and tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Initial combination therapy plays a central role in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) [1–4]. Patients with low- or intermediate-risk of 1-year mortality at diagnosis should be treated with initial combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) [2–4]. Benefits of initial therapy with the ERA ambrisentan and PDE5i tadalafil were demonstrated in AMBITION [1]; prospective evidence for other treatment combinations within these drug classes is needed.

Initial combination therapy with macitentan and tadalafil is well tolerated and improves cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and functional capacity in newly diagnosed PAH patientshttps://bit.ly/3aWZagH

Initial combination therapy of macitentan and tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Initial combination therapy with macitentan and tadalafil is well tolerated and improves cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and functional capacity in newly diagnosed PAH patients https://bit.ly/3aWZagH

Hemodynamics and risk assessment 2 years after the initiation of upfront ambrisentan‒tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Upfront combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil has been reported to improve the condition of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) more than with either drug alone. However, little is known about the long-term associated changes in hemodynamics and risk assessment scores.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical data in 106 patients with newly diagnosed PAH. Clinical evaluations, including demographics, medical history, World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), right heart catheterization, and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk score 2.0, were assessed over 48 months of ambrisentan‒tadalafil therapy.

RESULTS

At baseline, 9 patients (9%) showed a low (<7), 48 patients (45%) showed an intermediate (7-8), and 49 patients (46%) showed a high (>8) REVEAL risk score. At a median follow-up of 2 years, 45 patients (43%) showed a low, 47 patients (44%) showed an intermediate, and 14 patients (13%) showed a high REVEAL score, along with improvements in WHO FC, 6MWD and a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (all p < 0.001). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased by 37% from 11.5 ± 6.5 to 7.2 ± 4.1 Wood units (p < 0.001). A total of 61 patients (57%) remained in intermediate-risk or high-risk categories. Low-risk patients had either a decrease in PVR of >50% or a stroke volume within the limits of normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil in PAH improves the REVEAL risk score in proportion to decreased PVR and preserved stroke volume but still insufficiently so in approximately 50% of the patients.

Effect of Combination Therapy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonist and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor on Clinical Outcome and Pulmonary Haemodynamics in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor having different biological targets has become an integral part of the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, several clinical studies have reported conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

METHODS

After performing a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from seven relevant articles (publications till December 2018). PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis and reporting of findings. The odds ratio and mean difference were calculated to estimate the difference in clinical worsening, 6-minute walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide between the groups. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool and a meta-regression for probable variables affecting effect size.

RESULTS

The random-effect model analysis revealed an odds ratio of 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.76; p = 0.0002] for clinical worsening, mean difference of 15.64 (95% CI 2.67-28.61; p = 0.02) for 6-minute walking distance, - 1.66 (95% CI - 3.82 to 0.50; p = 0.13) for pulmonary vascular resistance and - 21.04 (95% CI - 26.87 to - 15.22; p < 0.00001) for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The meta-regression showed no statistically significant association between the dose and duration of treatment and outcomes (odds ratio of clinical worsening and mean difference of 6-minute walking distance).

CONCLUSIONS

In pulmonary arterial hypertension, endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination therapy significantly improved 6-minute walking distance, clinical worsening and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide compared with the monotherapy but did not offer any advantage in improving pulmonary vascular resistance.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42018091133.

Clinical and hemodynamic benefit of macitentan and riociguat upfront combination in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

In this open-label study, we evaluated the effect of upfront macitentan and riociguat combination in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. In 15 consecutive PAH patients, we collected clinical and hemodynamic data at baseline, visit 1 (median 4 months) and visit 2 (median 12 months). Survival and transplantation status were analyzed over 36 months. Statistical analysis included student t-test and 95% confidence interval (CI) ( t-statistic or Clopper-Pearson). Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate survival rate. There were 11/15 women (mean age 56 years), in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) III ( n = 14) or IV ( n = 1). The 6 min walk distance increased from 281.6 m (baseline) to 315.7 m (visit 1) and visit 2 (313.9 m), representing a 34- and 32-m change ( P < 0.05), respectively, associated with Borg score improvements. Brain natriuretic peptide decreased: 318.2 pg/mL (baseline) to 122.0 pg/mL (visit 1) and 98.6 pg/mL (visit 2) ( P < 0.05). WHO FC improved in eight patients (53%, 95% CI 27%-79%). Pulmonary vascular resistance (9.2 to 5.7 Wood Units) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (47.3 to 38.9 mmHg) decreased; cardiac index increased (2.3 to 3.0 L/min/m²) (baseline to visit 2, all P < 0.05). All patients had intermediate and high risk score (baseline); at 1-year follow-up, dual therapy led to reduction to low risk score in 7/15 (47%) patients. There were no unexpected or serious side effects. Three patients died due to unrelated causes; one patient received a lung transplant. Transplant-free survival rate (36 months) was 85%. Preliminary evidence is provided for effectiveness of initial macitentan and riociguat combination therapy in PAH.

Endothelin-receptor antagonists in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: where do we stand?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension, a disease largely neglected until a few decades ago, is presently the object of intense studies by several research teams. Despite considerable progress, pulmonary arterial hypertension remains a major clinical problem, because it is not always easy to diagnose, treat, and prevent. The disease was considered incurable until the late 1990s, when Epoprostenol was introduced as the first tool against this illness. More recently, therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension gained momentum after publication of the SERAPHIN and AMBITION trials, which also highlighted the importance of upfront therapy. This review also focuses on recent substudies from these trials and progress in drugs targeting the endothelin pathway. Future perspectives with regard to endothelin-receptor antagonists are also discussed.