High-sensitivity troponin in emergency room practice

Modern View on the Role of Sex-Specific Levels of High-Sensitive Cardiospecific Troponins T and I in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction

It is well known that the molecules of cardiospecific troponins T and I are localized in the troponin-tropomyosin complex of the cytoplasm of cardiac myocytes and, due to the specific localization, these cardiospecific troponins are widely used as diagnostic biomarkers of myocardial infarction. Cardiospecific troponins are released from the cytoplasm of cardiac myocytes as a result of irreversible cell damage (for example, ischemic necrosis of cardiomyocytes in myocardial infarction or apoptosis of cardiac myocytes in cardiomyopathies and heart failure) or reversible damage (for example, intense physical exertion, hypertension, the influence of stress factors, etc.). Current immunochemical methods for determining cardiospecific troponins T and I have extremely high sensitivity to subclinical (minor) damage to myocardial cells and, thanks to modern high-sensitive methods, it is possible to detect damage to cardiac myocytes in the early (subclinical) stages of a number of cardiovascular pathologies, including myocardial infarction. So, recently, leading cardiological communities (the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, etc.) have approved algorithms for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction based on the assessment of serum levels of cardiospecific troponins in the first 1 - 3 h after the onset of pain syndrome. An important factor that may affect early diagnostic algorithms of myocardial infarction are sex-specific features of serum levels of cardiospecific troponins T and I. This manuscript presents a modern view on the role of sex-specific serum levels of cardiospecific troponins T and I in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and the mechanisms of formation of sex-specific serum levels of troponins.

Gender Specificities of Cardiac Troponin Serum Levels: From Formation Mechanisms to the Diagnostic Role in Case of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiac troponins T and I are the main (most sensitive and specific) laboratory indicators of myocardial cell damage. A combination of laboratory signs of myocardial cell damage (elevated levels of cardiac troponins T and I) with clinical (severe chest pain spreading to the left side of the human body) and functional (rise or depression of the ST segment, negative T wave or emergence of the Q wave according to electrocardiography and/or decrease in the contractility of myocardial areas exposed to ischemia according to echocardiography) signs of myocardial ischemia is indicative of the ischemic damage to cardiomyocytes, which is characteristic of the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Today, with early diagnostic algorithms for ACS, doctors rely on the threshold levels of cardiac troponins (99th percentile) and on the dynamic changes in the serum levels over several hours (one, two, or three) from the moment of admission to the emergency department. That said, some recently approved highly sensitive methods for determining troponins T and I show variations in 99th percentile reference levels, depending on gender. To date, there are conflicting data on the role of gender specificities in the serum levels of cardiac troponins T and I in the diagnostics of ACS, and the specific mechanisms for the formation of gender differences in the serum levels of cardiac troponins T and I are unknown. The purpose of this article is to analyze the role of gender specificities in cardiac troponins T and I in the diagnostics of ACS, and to suggest the most likely mechanisms for the formation of differences in the serum levels of cardiac troponins in men and women.

Cardiac troponins: are there any differences between T and I?

The most recent international guidelines recommend the measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) using high-sensitivity methods (hs-cTn) for the detection of myocardial injury and the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Myocardial injury is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, but also a distinct entity. The 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction states that myocardial injury is detected when at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit is measured in a patient with high-sensitivity methods for cTnI or cTnT. Not infrequently, increased hs-cTnT levels are reported in patients with congenital or chronic neuromuscular diseases, while the hs-cTnI values are often in the normal range. Furthermore, some discrepancies between the results of laboratory tests for the two troponins are occasionally found in individuals apparently free of cardiac diseases, and also in patients with cardiac diseases. In this review article, authors discuss the biochemical, pathophysiological and analytical mechanisms which may cause discrepancies between hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT test results.

Epidemiology and mortality in an Italian region after the adoption of the universal definition of myocardial infarction

AIMS

The aim of the study is to validate at the biochemical level (presence of myocardial damage) the discharge diagnosis code ICD-9-CM 410.x1, and to compare the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) epidemiology based on pure administrative data with the epidemiology based on troponin and clinical data.

METHODS

The health-related administrative databases of the Italian Region Friuli Venezia Giulia were used as the source of information. All the databases are anonymous and can be linked with each other at the individual patient level through a univocal stochastic key. Two methods were used to assess incidence in 2017: the first used the main hospital discharge diagnosis, validated by biochemical myocardial necrosis; the second identified from the cohort of all patients with any myocardial injury those with ischemic origin.

RESULTS

The positive-predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of AMI (410.x1), validated at the biochemical level, was 96.2%.About 40% of patients with a not trivial biochemical myocardial injury and an ischemic heart disease diagnosis (e.g. 411) were discharged without either ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) diagnosis, leading to a sensitivity of clinical discharge diagnosis of 47.6%.Thirty-day and 90-day mortality at multivariate analysis resulted respectively, 1.8 and 4.0% in NSTEMI, 6.6 and 9.8% in STEMI, 8.8 and 12.2% in patients with biochemical AMI and discharge diagnosis other than 410.x1.

CONCLUSION

Pure administrative data (clinical discharge diagnosis) are today insufficient to catch the whole hospital epidemiology of myocardial infarction missing an important proportion of AMI with an adverse prognosis comparable with STEMI.