Triple valve surgery

Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Patients Undergoing Concomitant Aortic Valve Replacement

AIM

Mitral valve repair (MVr) is associated with more favourable long-term outcomes than mitral valve replacement (MVR) in cases of isolated mitral valve disease suitable for repair. However, there is debate regarding whether the superiority of MVr extends to patients with concomitant aortic and mitral valve disease. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare the survival benefits between aortic valve replacement (AVR) plus MVr with a double valve replacement (DVR).

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane until 20 October 2022. Studies comparing MVr and MVR in patients undergoing concomitant AVR were included. The primary outcome was long-term survival. The secondary outcomes were early mortality, mitral valve reoperation, and valve-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with a total of 140,638 patients were included in this analysis. Patients undergoing AVR plus MVr exhibited a favourable trend in long-term survival (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71-1.03; p=0.10; I2=58%). The reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that the long-term survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was higher in the AVR plus MVr (80.95%, 67.63%, and 51.18%, respectively) than in the DVR group (76.62%, 61.36%, 43.21%, respectively). Aortic valve replacement plus MVr had a lower risk of early mortality (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.58-0.79; p<0.001; I2=77%), thromboembolic events (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.98; p=0.03; I2=5%), and haemorrhagic events (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98; p=0.01; I2=59%). Moreover, both groups displayed comparable rates of mitral valve reoperation (HR 1.73; 95% CI 0.86-3.48; p=0.13; I2=60%) and infective endocarditis (RR 1.60; 95% CI 0.65-3.93; p=0.31; I2=0%). However, the rate of reoperation for AVR plus MVr significantly increased in rheumatic heart disease patients (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.66-6.59; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with DVR, AVR plus MVr was associated with favourable long-term survival, reduced early mortality risk, and a lower incidence of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events without increasing the risk of mitral valve reoperation or infective endocarditis in unselected patients. However, higher reoperation rates were observed in rheumatic heart disease patients undergoing AVR plus MVr.

Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery

Introduction

Low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) is a common complication in cardiac surgery, and we evaluated the incidence of its early occurrence after mitral and tricuspid combined cardiac surgery and its associated risk factors.

Material and method

Retrospective, single institution study. We included 88 consecutive adult patients with severe mitral insufficiency scheduled for elective mitral and tricuspid valve replacement surgery between January 2015 and November 2018. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of LCOS, defined as the need for inotropic support or circulatory assistance after surgery. The secondary endpoint was mortality at 30 days.

Results

LCOS occurred in 26 patients (29.5%) of the studied patients and its associated risk factors that appeared in the multivariate analysis were chronic kidney failure [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-9.9, p = 0.05], pre-operative left ventricular heart failure (OR 5.3; 95% CI 1.3-10.9, p = 0.002), pre-operative right ventricular heart failure (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.1-11.5, p = 0.02), and mitral valve replacement (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.2-12.6, p = 0.03). LCOS affected the survival of patients (HR = 5.5; 95% CI 1.1-27.7 p = 0.04).

Conclusion

LCOS is a frequent complication after mitral and tricuspid combined surgery and is associated with poor prognosis.

20 Years of triple-valve surgery in the UK: demographic and outcome trends

OBJECTIVES

To describe evolving demographic trends and early outcomes in patients undergoing triple-valve surgery in the UK between 2000 and 2019.

METHODS

We planned a retrospective analysis of national registry data including patients undergoing triple-valve surgery for all aetiologies of disease. We excluded patients in a critical preoperative state and those with missing admission dates. The study cohort was split into 5 consecutive 4-year cohorts (groups A, B, C, D and E). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included prolonged admission, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative stroke and postoperative dialysis. Binary logistic regression models were used to establish independent predictors of mortality, stroke, postoperative dialysis and re-exploration for bleeding in this high-risk cohort.

RESULTS

We identified 1750 patients undergoing triple-valve surgery in the UK between 2000 and 2019. Triple valve surgery represents 3.1% of all patients in the dataset. Overall mean age of patients was 68.5 ± 12 years, having increased from 63 ±12 years in group A to 69 ± 12 years in group E (P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 9%, dropping from 21% in group A to 7% in group E (P < 0.001). Overall rates of re-exploration for bleeding (11%, P = 0.308) and postoperative dialysis (11%, P = 0.066) remained high across the observed time period. Triple valve replacement, redo sternotomy and poor preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction emerged as strong independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple-valve surgery remains rare in the UK. Early postoperative outcomes for triple valve surgery have improved over time. Redo sternotomy is a significant predictor of mortality. Attempts should be made to repair the mitral and/or tricuspid valves where technically possible.

Outcomes Following Triple Cardiac Valve Surgery Over 17-years: A Multicentre Population-Linkage Study

INTRODUCTION

Studies have reported increasing triple valve surgery (TVS, defined as concomitant aortic, mitral and tricuspid valves surgery) incidence and improved postoperative survival. The epidemiology and outcome of TVS is not known in Australia.

METHODS

From the Admission-Patient-Data-Collection registry, all New South Wales residents who underwent cardiac valve surgery between 1 July 2001 and 31 December 2018 were identified, with cause-specific mortality tracked from the death registry.

RESULTS

Triple valve surgery comprised 1.2% (347/28,667 cases) of all valvular surgeries. Volumes rose from eight cases-per-annum in 2002 to a peak of 37 in 2012, and between 23 and 30 cases-per-annum since. Mean (±SD) age of study cohort (n=340 persons) was 68.2±15.2 years (50% male); 20.3% had concomitant coronary-artery-bypass-surgery (males vs females: 29.4% vs 11.2%, p<0.001). Main surgery on aortic and mitral valves was replacement (95.9% and 70.6% respectively). Tricuspid valve annuloplasty was performed in 90.6% of patients. Cumulative in-hospital, 180-day, and total mortality (mean follow-up=4.9±4.0 yrs) was 7.4%, 11.8% and 42.6%, respectively. Heart failure (24.0% in-hospital, 22.5% post-discharge) and sepsis (24.0% in-hospital, 20.0% post-discharge) were the main cause-specific deaths. There was no in-hospital stroke-related death. Age (median >72 yrs; hazard ratio [HR]=1.95, 95%CI=1.37-2.79), malignancy (HR=6.35, 95%CI=2.21-18.26), heart failure (HR=1.79, 95%CI=1.25-2.57) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (HR=2.21, 95%CI=1.39-3.51) (all p<0.005) were independent predictors during intermediate-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple valve surgery remains rare in Australia and is associated with high mortality. Multi-centred collaboration and access to comprehensive clinical data are required to identify the drivers of poor outcome.

Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery

OBJECTIVES

The prosthesis type for multiple valve surgery (replacement of two or more diseased native or prosthetic valves, replacement of two diseased valves with repair/reconstruction of a third, or replacement of a single diseased valve with repair/reconstruction of a second valve) remains inadequately evaluated. The clinical performance of multiple valve surgery with bioprostheses (BP) and mechanical prostheses (MP) was assessed to compare patient survival and composites of valve-related complications.

METHODS

Between 1975 and 2000, 1245 patients had multiple valve surgery (BP 785, mean age 62.0 ± 14.7 years; and MP 460, mean age 56.9 ± 12.9 years). There were 1712 procedures performed [BP 969(56.6%) and MP 743(43.4%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass (conCABG) was BP 206(21.3%) and MP 105(14.1%) (p = 0.0002). The cumulative follow-up was BP 5131 years and MP 3364 years. Independent predictors were determined for mortality, valve-related complications and composites of complications.

RESULTS

Unadjusted patient survival at 12 years was BP 52.1 ± 2.1% and MP 54.8 ± 4.6% (p = 0.1127), while the age adjusted survival was BP 48.7 ± 2.3% and MP 54.4 ± 5.0%. The predictors of overall mortality were age [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.051, p < 0.0001], previous valve (HR 1.366, p = 0.028) and conCABG (HR 1.27, p = 0.021). The actual freedom from valve-related mortality at 12 years was BP 85.6 ± 1.6% and MP 91.0 ± 1.6% (actuarial p = 0.0167). The predictors of valve-related mortality were valve type (BP > MP) (2.61, p = 0.001), age (HR 1.032, p = 0.0005) and previous valve (HR 12.61, p < 0.0001). The actual freedom from valve-related reoperation at 12 years was BP 60.8 ± 1.9% and MP85.6 ± 2.1% (actuarial p < 0.001). The predictors of valve-related reoperation were valve type (MP > BP) (HR 0.32, p < 0.0001), age (HR 0.99, p = 0.0001) and previous valve (HR 1.38, p = 0.008) CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival (age adjusted) is differentiated by valve type over 10 and 12 years and valve-related mortality and valve-related reoperation favours the use of mechanical prostheses, overall for multiple valve surgery.

Hepatorenal dysfunction predicts operative mortality after triple valve surgery: Utility of MELD-Na

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advancements in operative techniques and myocardial protection, triple valve surgery (TVS) remains a formidable operation with a relatively high in-hospital mortality. We evaluated the prognostic value of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score including sodium (MELD-Na) for mortality after TVS and its predictive value when incorporated in the EuroSCORE risk model.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 61 consecutive patients who underwent TVS from November 2005 to June 2016. Demographics, clinical, biochemical, and operative data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up duration was 8.0 years. The majority (70.5%) of patients suffered from rheumatic heart disease and underwent mechanical double valve replacement with tricuspid valve repair. There were six operative deaths (9.84%), with the most common cause of death being multiorgan failure (83.3%). In 26.2% of the cohort, the MELD-Na score was moderately elevated at 9 to 15. A small fraction (4.9%) had a severely elevated MELD-Na greater than 15. Patients with a MELD-Na greater than 9 had a higher unadjusted rate of operative mortality, prolonged ventilation, need for dialysis and acute liver failure after TVS. Hierarchical logistic regression was performed using logistic EuroSCORE as the base model. After risk adjustment, each point of MELD-Na score increase was associated with 1.405 times increase in odds of operative mortality. The regression analysis was repeated by incorporating individual components of the MELD-Na score, including bilirubin, sodium, and albumin. All three biochemical parameters were significantly associated with operative mortality CONCLUSION: MELD-Na score as a quantifier of hepatorenal dysfunction is sensitive and specific for operative mortality after triple valve surgery.

[Three-valve reconstruction with prosthetic repair of the ascending portion of the aorta in elderly patients]

Elderly and aged patients appear to have a significantly increased risk from a cardiosurgical intervention combining three-valve reconstruction and prosthetic repair of the ascending portion of the aorta. Triple-valve pathology in pronounced mitral insufficiency is often accompanied by concomitant dilatation of the left atrium, i. e., atriomegaly. With the aim to eliminate the syndrome of compression of surrounding tissues and normalize intracardiac haemodynamics, reduction of the left atrium should become an inherent procedure for atriomegaly in patients with multiple-valve pathology.

Minimally invasive triple valve surgery: A single center experience

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive surgery is a widely accepted surgical treatment for valve disease, however triple valve surgery (TVS) is a complex and challenging procedure. The objective of this study was to describe the morbidity and mortality related to minimally invasive TVS at our institution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all minimally invasive TVS performed between 2012 and 2019. Baseline and perioperative characteristics were reviewed, as were postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent TVS; 12 patients underwent additional procedures at the time of TVS. Median time to initial extubation was 11.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 9.8-13.3). Intensive care unit and total length of stay were 1.22 (IQR, 1.16-1.31) and 9 (IQR, 6-17) days, respectively. No hospital deaths occurred; 30-, 90-, and 365-day mortality were 0%. Two postoperative neurologic complications occurred, two patients had acute kidney injuries. The most common complication was rhythm disturbance with five patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. Mean follow-up was 39.9 months (252-2642 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that minimally invasive TVS utilizing femoral cannulation results in an acceptable risk of complication. Short and intermediate term survival were excellent.