1
|
Migliore F, Schiavone M, Pittorru R, Forleo GB, De Lazzari M, Mitacchione G, Biffi M, Gulletta S, Kuschyk J, Dall'Aglio PB, Rovaris G, Tilz R, Mastro FR, Iliceto S, Tondo C, Di Biase L, Gasperetti A, Tarzia V, Gerosa G. Left ventricular assist device in the presence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Data from a multicenter experience. Int J Cardiol 2024; 400:131807. [PMID: 38272130 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an increasingly used strategy for the management of patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) might be a viable alternative to conventional ICDs with a lower risk of short- and long-term of device-related complications and infections.The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the outcomes and management of S-ICD recipients who underwent LVAD implantation. METHODS The study population included patients with a preexisting S-ICD who underwent LVAD implantation for advanced HF despite optimal medical therapy. RESULTS The study population included 30 patients (25 male; median age 45 [38-52] years).The HeartMate III was the most common LVAD type. Median follow-up in the setting of concomitant use of S-ICDs and LVADs was 7 months (1-20).There were no reports of inability to interrogate S-ICD systems in this population. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) occurred in 21 (70%) patients. The primary sensing vector was the one most significantly involved in determining EMI. Twenty-seven patients (90%) remained eligible for S-ICD implantation with at least one optimal sensing vector. The remaining 3 patients (10%) were ineligible for S-ICD after attempts of reprogramming of sensing vectors. Six patients (20%) experienced inappropriate shocks (IS) due to EMI. Six patients (20%) experienced appropriate shocks. No S-ICD extraction because of need for antitachycardia pacing, ineffective therapy or infection was reported. CONCLUSIONS Concomitant use of LVAD and S-ICD is feasible in most patients. However, the potential risk of EMI oversensing, IS and undersensing in the post-operative period following LVAD implantation should be considered. Careful screening for EMI should be performed in all sensing vectors after LVAD implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Migliore
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
| | - Marco Schiavone
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology & Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Raimondo Pittorru
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Manuel De Lazzari
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Biffi
- Cardiology Unit, IRCCS, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Gulletta
- Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jurgen Kuschyk
- Cardiology Unit, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Pietro Bernardo Dall'Aglio
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Heart, Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Giovanni Rovaris
- Cardiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Roland Tilz
- Department of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - Florinda Rosaria Mastro
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Sabino Iliceto
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology & Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Montefiore Health System, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Alessio Gasperetti
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Vincenzo Tarzia
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Gino Gerosa
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tanawuttiwat T, Das MK, Miller JM, Guglin ME. Device-device interaction between cardiac implantable electronic devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:918-926. [PMID: 36863637 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
The current design of an innovative left ventricular assist device (LVAD) makes use of magnetic levitation technology, which enables the rotors of the device to be completely suspended by magnetic force, reducing friction and blood or plasma damage. However, this electromagnetic field can result in electromagnetic interference (EMI), which can interfere with proper functioning of another cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in its direct proximity. Approximately 80% of patients with an LVAD have a CIED, most frequently an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Several device-device interactions have been reported, including EMI-induced inappropriate shocks, inability to establish telemetry connection, EMI-induced premature battery depletion, undersensing by the device, and other CIED malfunctions. Unfortunately, additional procedures, including generator exchange, lead adjustment, and system extraction, are frequently required because of these interactions. In some circumstances, the additional procedure might be preventable or avoidable with appropriate solutions. In this article, we describe how EMI from the LVAD impacts the functionality of the CIED and provide possible management options, including manufacturer-specific information, for the current CIEDs (eg, transvenous and leadless pacemakers, transvenous and subcutaneous ICDs, and transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and ICDs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mithilesh K Das
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - John M Miller
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Maya E Guglin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nieves J, Laslett DB, Basil A, Whitman IR, Cooper JM, Cronin EM. Simultaneous Leadless Pacemaker and Subcutaneous ICD Implantation With Intraoperative Screening: Workflow in Two Patients. JACC Case Rep 2022; 4:101535. [PMID: 36507298 PMCID: PMC9730143 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
A communicating subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and leadless pacemaker system is being developed for patients who require both pacing and ICD therapy. It is important to ensure that the paced morphology from the leadless pacemaker will be sensed appropriately by the subcutaneous ICD. We present 2 cases illustrating our approach and workflow. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Edmond M. Cronin
- Address for correspondence: Dr Edmond M. Cronin, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 North Broad Street, 9th Floor, Parkinson Pavilion, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bonnì E, Coppola G. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and left ventricular assist devices for refractory heart failure: attention to possible interference. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2021; 22:e52. [PMID: 34747932 DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000001199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Bonnì
- O.U. of Cardiology, University Hospital 'P. Giaccone', Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|