Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response syndrome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Management of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Cardiovascular Interventions. Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Implications

A substantial number of patients may experience systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and related adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Although a clear etiology has not been established, endothelial disruption and tissue-ischemic response secondary to the foreign material may represent the trigger events. A latency period (0 to 48 hours) may occur between the initial injury and onset of symptoms mirroring an initial local response followed by a systemic response. Clinical presentation can be mild or severe depending on external triggers and characteristics of the patient. Diagnosis is challenging because it simulates an infection, but lack of response to antibiotics, negative cultures are supportive of SIRS. Increased in-hospital stay, readmissions, major cardiovascular events, and reduced durability of the device used are the main complications. Treatment includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. In conclusion, further studies are warranted to fully explore pathophysiologic mechanisms underpinning SIRS and the possibility of enhancing device material immune compatibility to reduce the inflammatory reaction of the host tissue.

Tumour necrosis factor-alpha serum level is an independent predictor of medium-term all-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a suitable treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and severely increased operative risk. There is need for a better preoperative risk assessment for TAVI candidates.

AIM

To determine whether Tumour necrosis factor-alfa (TNFα) is an independent predictor of survival 500 days after TAVI.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled in the study. TNFα was determined. The CT measured low-density muscle fraction (LDM%) of the psoas muscle was determined. Operative risk assessment by Logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and STS score was performed. Frailty scores (FRAIL scale and Barthel index) were determined.

RESULTS

Mean age was 81.01 ± 7.54 years. Twenty-six (43.3%) of the patients were males. In the univariable analyses, FRAIL scale and Barthel index were no predictors of survival after TAVI. In the multivariable analysis, including EuroSCORE II, LDM% and TNFα serum concentration, TNFα serum level was an independent predictor of survival 500 days after TAVI (HR: 3.167; 95%: 1.279-7.842; p = 0.013). The multivariable analysis, including TNFα as a categorical variable, showed that compared to patients in the conjugated first and second TNFα serum level tertile, patients in the third tertile had a hazard ratio (HR) of 10.606 (95%CI: 1.203 - 93.467) (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

TNFα is an incremental independent predictor of long-term survival after TAVI.

Atrial fibrillation before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: short- and long-term clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have been associated with worse short-term outcomes compared with patients in sinus rhythm but data on long-term outcomes are limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between AF and short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing TAVI between 2012 and 2022 in four tertiary centres. Two different analyses were conducted: (i) in-hospital and (ii) postdischarge analysis. First, we evaluated the association between preexisting AF and short-term outcomes according to VARC-3 criteria. Second, we analyzed the association between AF at discharge (defined as both preexisting and new-onset AF occurring after TAVI) and long-term outcomes at median follow-up of 3.2 years (i.e. all-cause death, hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular events).

RESULTS

A total of 759 patients were initially categorized according to the presence of preexisting AF (241 vs. 518 patients). The preexisting AF group had a higher occurrence of acute kidney injury [odds ratio (OR) 1.65; 95%confidence interval ( CI) 1.15-2.38] and major bleeding (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.06-3.27). Subsequently, the population was categorized according to the presence of AF at discharge. At the adjusted Cox regression analysis, AF was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalization [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86], all-cause death and all-cause hospitalization (aHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06-1.78) and all-cause hospitalization (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.14.2.22).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world cohort of patients undergoing TAVI, the presence of AF (preexisting and new-onset) was independently associated with both short- and long-term adverse outcomes.

Acute expansion of nitinol-based self-expandable device in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

The acute adaptation of the nitinol-based stent frame self expandable valve to the aortic root after deployment is poorly understood. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the occurrence, degree and determinants of acute adaptation of the nitinol-based stent frame self-expandable valves after implantation.

METHODS

This is a single-site prospective registry including patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a widely used second-generation nitinol-based self-expandable device (Evolut R, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). We measured valve diameters at three different sections: distal (aortic) level, central (annulus) level and proximal (ventricular) level. Valve expansion was estimated by the difference between the diameters calculated immediately after valve deployment (A) and at the end of the procedure (B). The absolute and relative stent changes were defined as B-A and (B-A)/B∗100, respectively. A linear regression model was performed to test the association between the degree of valve extension at each segment with baseline and procedural characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 58 consecutive TAVR patients were included in this analysis, with a mean age of 82.12 ± 5.28 years. Out of the total, 46% of the patients had chronic kidney disease, 32% had diabetes and 76% had dyslipidaemia. The mean procedural time was 28.11 ± 11.6 min, with 53.45% of predilation. Postdilation was performed only in 3.5% of patients. Final stent diameters were significantly higher than those achieved immediately after valve implantation - an observation that was consistent for all the segments: 0.50 ± 0.51 mm and 2.48 ± 2.57% (P < 0.01) in the proximal, 0.46 ± 0.57 mm and 2.39 ± 2.96% (P < 0.01) in the central, as well as 0.58 ± 0.59 mm and 2.14 ± 2.14% (P < 0.01) at the distal segments. Postdilation significantly affected the expansion of the central segment, and, albeit not significantly, the proximal one, while no changes were observed for the distal portion of the platform.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to have documented a significant degree of the Evolut R self-expandable valve expansion after deployment. However, further studies are required to assess the short- and long-term time course of self-expandable valve enlargement and the clinical relevance of this finding.