Radionuclide evidence for reversible ischemia after percutaneous treatment of anomalous right coronary artery with dynamic compression by great vessels

Is endovascular therapy the right choice for treatment of functional compression of anomalous right coronary artery arising from left coronary sinus with interarterial course?

We report a case of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for reversible ischaemia owing to an anomalous right coronary artery arising from the left coronary sinus with malignant interarterial course and not associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). PCI for treatment of functional compression of the ostioproximal intramural segment of the anomalous vessel, though described in the literature, is technically challenging, requiring appropriate hardware selection; the peculiar anatomical milieu, in the absence of atherosclerotic CAD, lends itself to an uncertain long-term outcome following endovascular therapy with stenting.

Anomalous origination of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus

Anomalous origination of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus (ACAOS) is estimated to be present in 0.2-2.0% of the population. In the majority of individuals, ACAOS has no hemodynamic or prognostic implications, but in a minority of cases, typically where the anomalous coronary artery takes an interarterial course to reach its correct myocardial territory, it can precipitate ischemia and sudden cardiac death (SCD). With the growing use of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in the investigation of ischemic heart disease, we can expect increasing rates of incidental detection of this anomaly. Although CTCA and magnetic resonance coronary angiography can effectively characterize these lesions anatomically, they fail to describe and quantitatively assess the basic defect that leads to coronary insufficiency, such as mural intussusception. The key challenge lies in the identification of which patients are at risk of SCD and, therefore, who should be offered corrective surgical or (potentially) percutaneous intervention. Conventional, noninvasive stress testing has limited sensitivity, but emerging, invasive stress tests, which utilize intravascular ultrasonography and measurements of fractional flow reserve, show the potential to provide more-accurate hemodynamic and prognostic assessment.