The left atrial septal pouch as a possible location for thrombus formation

The Role of Echocardiography in the Assessment of the Interatrial Septum and Patent Foramen Ovale as an Emboligenic Source

A comunicação do septo atrial (CIA) representa, aproximadamente, de 6%-10% dos defeitos cardíacos congênitos, com incidência de 1 em 1.500 nascidos vivos.1 Forame oval patente (FOP) é mais comum e está presente em mais de 20%-25% dos adultos.2 Síndromes clínicas associadas a CIA e FOP são variáveis, com implicações abrangendo a medicina pediátrica e adulta, neurologia e cirurgia.

O interesse adicional na anatomia do septo interatrial (SIA) aumentou substancialmente nas últimas duas décadas, com evolução simultânea dos procedimentos percutâneos envolvendo cardiopatia estrutural do lado esquerdo e procedimentos eletrofisiológicos. Idealmente, essas intervenções baseadas em cateter requerem rota direta para o átrio esquerdo (AE) através do SIA, necessitando completo entendimento de sua anatomia. Atualmente, tecnologias de imagem sofisticadas e não invasivas como ecocardiografia transesofágica bidimensional (ETE 2D) e tridimensional (ETE 3D), ressonância cardíaca (RMC) e tomografia computadorizada (TC) passaram por um extraordinário desenvolvimento tecnológico, fornecendo detalhes anatômicos das estruturas cardíacas visualizadas em formato 2D e 3D e são essenciais para diagnóstico e tratamento de pacientes com doenças cardíacas.

A avaliação da anatomia e anormalidades do SIA, portanto, requer abordagem padronizada e sistemática, integrando modalidades diagnósticas e fornecendo avaliação adequada e uniforme para terapias cirúrgicas e transcateter.

Prevalence of left atrial septal pouch among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source or stroke of known etiology: A retrospective study

Background and objectives

Cryptogenic strokes can be defined by the criteria established for an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Some embolic events might be caused by a left atrial septal pouch (LASP), due to the potential of thrombus formation. In this study we aimed to determine if LASP is a risk factor for ESUS when compared to a population of strokes of known origin, the LASP screening rate in our institution and if LASP dimensions influences the risk of ESUS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs) in a large cohort of patients that had experienced ischemic strokes. Two authors performed blinded, independent searches for LASPs by reviewing 1152 TEEs from patients that had experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. We excluded 26 TEEs, due to incorrect imaging. Next, we reviewed patient medical files.

Results

Among the 1126 included patients, 148 had an ESUS (ESUS+ group) and 978 had strokes of known origin (ESUS– group). A LASP was present in 176 patients, including 32 patients (21.6% of LASPs) in the ESUS+ group and 144 patients (14.7% of LASPs) in the ESUS– group. In multivariate analysis, LASP was independently associated with ESUS (P = 0,019). 61.9% of LASPs that we found were not mentioned in reports from the original TEE operators.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that LASPs were more prevalent in patients with ESUS than in patients with strokes of known origin. Our results gave rise to the question of whether anticoagulation would be appropriate for some patients with ESUS. New large-scale, prospective studies should be conducted to address this issue. Additionally, considering the low rate of LASP descriptions, we concluded that the awareness of operators should be raised to improve their success in identifying LASPs.

Prevalence of left atrial septal pouch among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source or stroke of known etiology: A retrospective study

Background and objectives

Cryptogenic strokes can be defined by the criteria established for an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Some embolic events might be caused by a left atrial septal pouch (LASP), due to the potential of thrombus formation. In this study we aimed to determine if LASP is a risk factor for ESUS when compared to a population of strokes of known origin, the LASP screening rate in our institution and if LASP dimensions influences the risk of ESUS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs) in a large cohort of patients that had experienced ischemic strokes. Two authors performed blinded, independent searches for LASPs by reviewing 1152 TEEs from patients that had experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. We excluded 26 TEEs, due to incorrect imaging. Next, we reviewed patient medical files.

Results

Among the 1126 included patients, 148 had an ESUS (ESUS+ group) and 978 had strokes of known origin (ESUS– group). A LASP was present in 176 patients, including 32 patients (21.6% of LASPs) in the ESUS+ group and 144 patients (14.7% of LASPs) in the ESUS– group. In multivariate analysis, LASP was independently associated with ESUS (P = 0,019). 61.9% of LASPs that we found were not mentioned in reports from the original TEE operators.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that LASPs were more prevalent in patients with ESUS than in patients with strokes of known origin. Our results gave rise to the question of whether anticoagulation would be appropriate for some patients with ESUS. New large-scale, prospective studies should be conducted to address this issue. Additionally, considering the low rate of LASP descriptions, we concluded that the awareness of operators should be raised to improve their success in identifying LASPs.