Acute kidney injury after primary angioplasty: effect of different hydration treatments

Prevalence of contrast-induced nephropathy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention at a tertiary referral hospital

Objective

This study aimed to quantify the incidence of Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) due to acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

From April 2019 to March 2022, a prospective, observational study enrolled 213 consecutive STEMI patients referred to a tertiary hospital for PPCI. Participants were divided into tow groups based on the presence or absence of contrast-induced nephropathy. The chi-square test (χ2) and Student's t-test evaluated the data, with logistic regression identifying CIN's independent predictors.

Results

Results: In this study, the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was observed at 13.1% (N = 28). Several factors were more prevalent among patients exhibiting contrast-induced nephropathy. These factors encompassed: radial access for coronary angiography over the femoral method (P = 0.021), elevated contrast volume (P = 0.003), smoking (P = 0.009), diabetes (P = 0.04), heart failure (P = 0.049), a history of coronary artery bypass graft (P = 0.006), diminished left ventricular ejection fraction indicating systolic dysfunction (P = 0.012), cardiogenic shock (P = 0.046), increased BUN at the time of admission (P = 0.043), decreased initial GFR (P = 0.004), and prior consumption of medications such as aspirin (P = 0.002), diuretics (P = 0.046), beta blockers (P = 0.04), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P = 0.033), angiotensin receptor blockers (P = 0.02). Other relevant conditions included anemia (P = 0.012), leukocytosis (P = 0.011), hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.034), and reduced HDL levels (P = 0.004).Through logistic regression, key predictors for the onset of contrast-induced nephropathy were determined, which included heart failure (OR: 5.52; 95% CI: 1.08-28.24), radial access (OR: 12.71; 95% CI: 1.45-110.9), hypercholesterolemia (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.004-1.04), increased BUN upon admission (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.006-1.24), and leukocytosis (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.18-3.49).

Conclusions

While heart failure, radial access, hypercholesterolemia, elevated BUN at admission, and leukocytosis significantly influenced renal filtration deterioration post-PPCI, it's evident that CIN is multifactorial. Further studies are crucial to elucidate the underlying factors.

Hydration Strategies for Preventing Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Aims

Many previous studies have examined the effect of different hydration strategies on prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), but the optimal strategy is unknown. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) of these previous studies to identify the optimal strategy.

Methods and Results

Web of Science, PubMed, OVID Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception dates to September 30, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected based on strict inclusion criteria, and a Bayesian NWM was performed using WinBUGS V.1.4.3. We finally analyzed 60 eligible RCTs, which examined 21,293 patients and 2232 CI-AKI events. Compared to intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride (reference), intravenous sodium bicarbonate (OR [95% CI]: 0.74 [0.57, 0.93]), hemodynamic guided hydration (0.41 [0.18, 0.93]), and RenalGuard guided hydration (0.32 [0.14, 0.70]) significantly reduced the occurrence of CI-AKI. Oral hydration and intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride were each noninferior to no hydration in preventing CI-AKI. Intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, and hemodynamic guided hydration were each noninferior to oral hydration in preventing CI-AKI. Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, the RenalGuard system was best (0.974) and hemodynamic guided hydration was second best (0.849).

Conclusion

There was substantial evidence to support the use of RenalGuard or hemodynamic guided hydration for preventing CI-AKI in high-risk patients, especially those with chronic kidney disease or cardiac dysfunction.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of preventive strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization

BACKGROUND

The optimal preventive strategy for contrast induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different preventive strategies for CIAKI in these cohorts.

METHODS

Forty-nine randomized controlled trials were extracted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL data bases (inception-1st December 2017). We calculated median of the odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI). The ranking probability of each treatment was based on SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve).

RESULTS

In NMA of 28,063 patients [normal saline (NS: 9716 patients), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3: 4484 patients), statin (2542 patients), N-acetylcysteine (NAC: 3006 patients), NAC + NaHCO3 (774 patients), NS + NAC (3807 patients), NS + NaHCO3 (135 patients) and placebo (3599 patients)], statins reduced the relative risk of CIAKI compared with NS (OR: 0.50; 95% CrI, 0.25-0.99), and placebo (OR: 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.24-0.83). Subgroup analyses showed that in patients receiving low osmolar contrast, statins reduced the relative risk of CIAKI by 58% versus NS, and 51% versus placebo. There were no significant differences across all the treatments in terms of risk of hemodialysis or all-cause mortality. Statins had the highest probability for reducing the risk of CIAKI (SUCRA, 0.86), risk of hemodialysis (SUCRA, 0.88) and all-cause mortality (SUCRA, 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Statins were the superior preventive strategy for reducing the risk of CIAKI compared with NS alone and placebo.

Strategies Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 125 Randomized Controlled Trials

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the strength of evidence for the effects of hydration (sodium bicarbonate [SB] and normal saline [NS]), supplementations ( N-acetylcysteine [NAC] and vitamin C), and some common drugs (adenosine antagonists [AAs], statins, loop diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs]) on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and requirement for hemodialysis after coronary angiography. After screening, a total of 125 trials that reported outcomes were identified. Pooled analysis indicated beneficial effects of SB versus NS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.94; P = .01), NAC (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.70-0.88; P = .001), vitamin C (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45-0.89; P = .01), statins (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35-0.57; P = .001), AA (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.47; P = .001), loop diuretics (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.33-2.85; P = .9), and ACEI (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.61; P = .8). Overall, hydration with SB, use of supplements, such as NAC and vitamin C, and administration of statins and AA should always be considered for the prevention of CIN after coronary angiography.

Aggressive hydraTion in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial infarction undergoing Primary percutaneous coronary intervention to prevenT contrast-induced nephropathy (ATTEMPT): Study design and protocol for the randomized, controlled trial, the ATTEMPT, RESCIND 1 (First study for REduction of contraSt-induCed nephropathy followINg carDiac catheterization) trial

Adequate hydration is recommended for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). However, the optimal hydration regimen has not been well established in these high-risk patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a preprocedural loading dose plus postprocedural aggressive hydration with normal saline guided by the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) compared with general hydration for CIN prevention. The ATTEMPT study is a multicenter, open-label, investigator-driven, randomized controlled trial in China. Approximately 560 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI will be randomized (1:1) to receive either periprocedural general hydration (control group) or aggressive hydration (treatment group). Patients in the control group receive periprocedural general hydration with ≤500 mL normal saline (within 6 hours) at a normal rate (0.5 or 1 mL/kg · h). Patients in the treatment group receive a preprocedural loading dose (125/250 mL) of normal saline within 30 minutes and intravenous hydration at a normal rate until LVEDP is available, followed by postprocedural aggressive hydration guided by LVEDP for 4 hours and then continuous intravascular hydration at the normal rate until 24 hours after PCI. The primary end point is CIN, defined as a >25% or 0.5-mg/dL increase in serum creatinine from baseline during the first 48 to 72 hours after procedure. The ATTEMPT study has the potential to identify optimal hydration regimens for STEMI patients undergoing PCI.

Economic impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury associated with invasive cardiology: role of iso-osmolar contrast media in Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain

OBJECTIVE

Iso-osmolar Iodixanol is associated with a lower rate of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients at increased risk compared to low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). The aim of this study was to assess the financial consequences of CI-AKI risk reduction in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in German, Italian, Polish and Spanish hospitals.

METHODS

This budget impact analysis (BIA) compared a scenario with iodixanol to a scenario without, where only LOCM were used, in patients at increased risk of CI-AKI over a 3-year horizon. A meta-analysis based on a systematic review observed a lower rate of CI-AKI with iodixanol compared to LOCM (Risk Reduction = 0.46) in patients with underlying impaired renal function (serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dl and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤50 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Contrast media and CI-AKI hospitalization costs were included in the analysis and unit costs were obtained from published literature, official sources or, when available, from hospital data. In the absence of country-specific data, resource utilization for a CI-AKI hospitalization was obtained by interviews with local clinicians in each country. The percentage of patients who received iodixanol was assumed to increase over time.

RESULTS

Based on a percentage of patients at increased risk of CI-AKI equal to 20% in Germany, 24% in Italy, 23% in Poland and 10% in Spain, results showed that the introduction of iodixanol would bring a 3-years cumulative net percentage saving on the total hospital budget of 29%, 34%, 25%, and 33% in the four countries respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the analysis for the four countries showed that iodixanol use in patients at increased risk of CI-AKI undergoing CA with or without PCI may bring considerable savings on the hospital's budget, due to the associated reduction in CI-AKI incidence.