Effect of glucocorticoid administration on serum aldosterone concentration in clinically normal dogs

Correction of serum chloride concentration in dogs with congestive heart failure

Background

Hypochloremia associated with congestive heart failure (CHF) in dogs is likely multifactorial. Loop diuretics cause 1:2 sodium [Na⁺]:chloride [Cl⁻] loss, whereas water retention causes a 1:1 [Na⁺]:[Cl⁻] dilution. Mathematical [Cl⁻] correction separates these effects on [Cl⁻].

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that corrected [Cl⁻] (c[Cl⁻]) would not differ from measured [Cl⁻] (m[Cl⁻]) in dogs with controlled CHF because of loop diuretics, and dogs with refractory CHF would have higher c[Cl⁻] than m[Cl⁻], indicating relative water excess.

Animals

Seventy‐one client‐owned dogs with acquired heart disease, without CHF (NO‐CHF), 76 with Stage C CHF and 24 with Stage D CHF.

Methods

Clinicopathological data from a previous study were retrospectively analyzed. Corrected [Cl⁻], m[Cl⁻], and differences were compared among NO‐CHF, Stage C CHF, and Stage D CHF, using the formula: c[Cl⁻] = (mid‐reference range [Na⁺]/measured [Na⁺]) × m[Cl⁻].

Results

Corrected [Cl⁻] and m[Cl⁻] were lower in Stage D vs Stage C and NO‐CHF (all P < .0001). The c[Cl⁻] was higher than m[Cl⁻] in Stage D (P < .0001) but not Stage C or NO‐CHF. Median difference between c[Cl⁻] and m[Cl⁻] was higher for Stage D vs Stage C (P = .0003). No hypochloremic Stage D dogs had normal c[Cl⁻], but 11/24 had [Cl⁻] that was increased by >2 mmol/L.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Serum [Cl⁻] increased after mathematical correction in Stage D CHF dogs but not in Stage C and NO‐CHF dogs. Although c[Cl⁻] was higher than m[Cl⁻] in Stage D dogs supportive of relative water excess, hypochloremia persisted, consistent with concurrent loop diuretic effects on electrolytes. Future study correlating c[Cl⁻] to antidiuretic hormone concentrations is warranted.

Renin-Angiotensin-aldosterone system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in hospitalized newborn foals

BACKGROUND

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) and their interactions during illness and hypoperfusion are important to maintain organ function. HPAA dysfunction and relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) are common in septic foals. Information is lacking on the RAAS and mineralocorticoid response in the context of RAI in newborn sick foals.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To investigate the RAAS, as well as HPAA factors that interact with the RAAS, in hospitalized foals, and to determine their association with clinical findings. We hypothesized that critical illness in newborn foals results in RAAS activation, and that inappropriately low aldosterone concentrations are part of the RAI syndrome of critically ill foals.

ANIMALS

A total of 167 foals ≤3 days of age: 133 hospitalized (74 septic, 59 sick nonseptic) and 34 healthy foals.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study. Blood samples were collected on admission. Plasma renin activity (PRA) and angiotensin-II (ANG-II), aldosterone, ACTH, and cortisol concentrations were measured in all foals.

RESULTS

ANG-II, aldosterone, ACTH, and cortisol concentrations as well as ACTH/aldosterone and ACTH/cortisol ratios were higher in septic foals compared with healthy foals (P < .05). No difference in PRA between groups was found. High serum potassium and low serum chloride concentrations were associated with hyperaldosteronemia in septic foals.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

RAAS activation in critically ill foals is characterized by increased ANG-II and aldosterone concentrations. Inappropriately low cortisol and aldosterone concentrations defined as high ACTH/cortisol and ACTH/aldosterone ratios in septic foals suggest that RAI is not restricted to the zona fasciculata in critically ill newborn foals.

Efficacy of selective mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid agonists in canine septic shock

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroid regimens that stimulate both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid pathways consistently reverse vasopressor-dependent hypotension in septic shock but have variable effects on survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether exogenous mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid treatments have distinct effects and whether the timing of administration alters their effects in septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Desoxycorticosterone, a selective mineralocorticoid agonist; dexamethasone, a selective glucocorticoid agonist; and placebo were administered either several days before (prophylactic) or immediately after (therapeutic) infectious challenge and continued for 96 hrs in 74 canines with staphylococcal pneumonia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Effects of desoxycorticosterone and dexamethasone were different and opposite depending on timing of administration for survival (p = .05); fluid requirements (p = .05); central venous pressures (p ≤ .007); indicators of hemoconcentration (i.e., sodium [p = .0004], albumin [p = .05], and platelet counts [p = .02]); interleukin-6 levels (p = .04); and cardiac dysfunction (p = .05). Prophylactic desoxycorticosterone treatment significantly improved survival, shock, and all the other outcomes stated, but therapeutic desoxycorticosterone did not. Conversely, prophylactic dexamethasone was much less effective for improving these outcomes compared with therapeutic dexamethasone with the exception of shock reversal. Prophylactic dexamethasone given before sepsis induction also significantly reduced serum aldosterone and cortisol levels and increased body temperature and lactate levels compared with therapeutic dexamethasone (p ≤ .05), consistent with adrenal suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In septic shock, mineralocorticoids are only beneficial if given prophylactically, whereas glucocorticoids are most beneficial when given close to the onset of infection. Prophylactic mineralocorticoids should be further investigated in patients at high risk to develop sepsis, whereas glucocorticoids should only be administered therapeutically to prevent adrenal suppression and worse outcomes.