Evaluation of a stepped, fixed-height magnification marker stand for use with a 100-mm marker in implant sizing prediction in 52 total hip replacement procedures in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of a 100-millimeter marker placed on a stepped, fixed-height magnification marker stand to measure radiographic magnification on accuracy of implant size prediction when used for canine total hip replacement (THR) implant size selection.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

ANIMALS

Fifty-two hips in 45 dogs.

METHODS

This study evaluated 52 consecutive canine total hip replacement surgery pre-planning procedures involving 45 dogs with 7 undergoing staged bilateral THRs. Data collected included demographic information, measured radiographic magnification for magnification recalibration, implant size prediction of the cups (52) and the stems (52) based on digital templates superimposed on digital radiographs, and the actual implant sizes used during surgery.

RESULTS

Use of the magnification marker stand (MMS) and template application system resulted in an accurate prediction of implant size of 98/104 implants (94.2%) implants.

CONCLUSION

A 100-mm marker placed on a magnification marker stand was a viable method to measure and recalibrate for magnification on digital radiographs during the template process to predict the THR implant sizes that should be available when the surgery begins.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This stepped calibration marker stand is helpful in determination of an accurate preoperative THR implant size prediction, lowering implant stock thresholds, operating time, and associated complications. Additionally, the radiographic documentation of the marker's step height allows for indefinite confirmation of the magnification marker height used and for accurate repeatability for all follow-up imaging examinations and contralateral procedure planning.

Evaluation and Comparison of Self-Made and Commercial Calibration Markers for Radiographic Magnification Correction in Veterinary Digital Radiography

INTRODUCTION

 Magnification error is always present in radiography and calibration is necessary, if high accuracy is required in pre-surgical planning. The goal of this study was to verify the use of self-made markers and calibration techniques and to establish guidelines for magnification correction.

METHODS

 We evaluated and compared spherical and linear markers of different sizes with focus on practicability, accuracy and precision. Markers were placed on foam pads or attached to flexible arms.

RESULTS

 Vertical marker deviation of 1 cm from the anatomical reference point corresponded to ∼1% of magnification error in our setting. Marker placement along the horizontal plane showed no significant magnification in the periphery of the radiograph. All markers showed good accuracy and the commercial spherical marker with a flexible segment arm had the best results regarding practicability.

DISCUSSION

 Our study suggests that marker type is not solely responsible for usability and accuracy but also the type of fixation. In the absence of a calibration marker, calculation of the magnification factor using a measurement tape during radiography is equally reliable. Use of a fixed averaged calculated calibration factor showed poor agreement compared with the marker calibration, probably due to variability in size of the animals. In conclusion, if precision matters, use of a calibration marker, which could be purchased or self-made, is advised.

Effect of bone type on clinical and radiographic outcomes of a proximally-coated cementless stem in primary total hip arthroplasties

We determined the effect of pre-operative bone structure upon the temporal effects of remodeling after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a series of uncemented implants. We evaluated 345 patients (375 hips), who had either Dorr Type-A (238 hips) or Type-B (137 hips) bone, and who received a proximally-coated cementless THA and were followed for a mean of 6 years. Outcomes evaluated included aseptic survivorship, Harris hip scores, and radiographic evaluation for patterns of remodeling. The aseptic survivorship (97.5% vs. 98%) and the mean final Harris hip scores (92 vs. 94 points) were similar between Types-A and -B bone, respectively. Bone remodeling was seen significantly earlier and over a longer duration for patients who had Type-B bone. At 5-years, periprosthetic condensation (78% vs. 54%) and cortical hypertrophy (53% vs. 37%) were significantly higher and radiolucencies at any zone were lower (53% vs. 37%) in Type-B compared to Type-A bone. There was increased condensation in men and higher cortical hypertrophy in women. Various radiographic remodeling differences may not negatively impact clinical outcome at mid-term follow-up. Morphologic bone type appears to be predictive of physiologic response to loading.

Femoral imaging artifacts associated with dorsal recumbency craniocaudal radiographic positioning. Description of a modified bisecting angle technique

OBJECTIVES

To describe the radiographic length distortion associated with femoral tilt during cranio-caudal positioning. To describe a modified bisecting angle technique to alleviate image foreshortening.

METHODS

Five pairs of femurs were imaged. The femurs were tilted from 0 to 50 degrees and the X-ray anode was tilted from 0 to 40 degrees. Femoral length was measured on the resulting images. A geometric model depicting sagittal femoral positioning was described with two trigonometric formulas. Trigonometric formula 1 (TF¹) was designed to predict apparent femoral length. Data generated by TF¹ were compared to the cadaveric study results. Trigonometric formula 2 (TF²), based on the same model, was used to predict the ideal anode angle (iAA) to alleviate foreshortening. Unrelated to the model, a simplified linear formula (SF) was created to approximate the TF². Data generated with the SF and the TF² were compared.

RESULTS

When the femoral specimens were tilted to 20 degrees or greater, significant foreshortening was appreciated (p <0.001). Increasing the anode angle increased apparent length, eliminating foreshortening. Data generated by the TF¹ agreed closely with the results of the cadaveric study (R² = 0.999). The SF and the TF² demonstrated close agreement and were able to predict an iAA consistent with the results of the cadaveric study.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

A femoral tilt of 20 degrees or greater results in significant image foreshortening and may warrant alternate radiographic techniques. If the femur is tilted, adjusting the anode angle can alleviate femoral foreshortening.

Radiographic fit and fill analysis of a new second-generation proximally coated cementless stem compared to its predicate design

The purpose of this study was to compare in vivo fit and fill analysis of a new second-generation proximally coated cementless stem compared to its predicate design. This prospective trial of 100 total hip arthroplasties compared specific radiographic "Fit and Fill" parameters between the two designs. Fit type was assessed by comparing the type of canal fill. Post-operative fill parameters such as mean stem-to-canal ratios and mean minimum and maximum gaps between the stems to the cortical bone in different sections and areas were compared. A significantly higher proportion of the second-generation stems had Type I fit (82% vs. 54%), had better stem to canal fill ratio in the middle (90.6% vs. 85.3%) and distal sections (88.1% vs. 78.6%) compared to the older design. The new second-generation stem design had a significantly better canal fit and distal canal fill in the medial and lateral portions.