Does the Pulsatile Non-uniform Flow Matter in MR Flowmetry?

4D Flow MRI in the portal venous system: imaging and analysis methods, and clinical applications

Thus far, ultrasound, CT, and 2D cine phase-contrast MRI has been adopted to evaluate blood flow and vascular morphology in the portal venous system; however, all these techniques have some shortcomings, such as limited field of view and difficulty in accurately evaluating blood flow. A new imaging technique, namely 3D cine phase-contrast (4D Flow) MRI, can acquire blood flow data of the entire abdomen at once and in a time-resolved manner, allowing visual, quantitative, and comprehensive assessment of blood flow in the portal venous system. In addition, a retrospective blood flow analysis, i.e., "retrospective flowmetry," is possible. Although the development of 4D Flow MRI for the portal system has been delayed compared to that for the arterial system owing to the lower flow velocity of the portal venous system and the presence of respiratory artifacts, several useful reports have recently been published as the technology has advanced. In the first part of this narrative review article, technical considerations of image acquisition and analysis methods of 4D Flow MRI for the portal venous system and the validations of their results are described. In the second part, the current clinical application of 4D Flow MRI for the portal venous system is reviewed.

Why 4D Flow MRI? Real Advantages

This special issue of Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences features the most recent reviews on 4D Flow MRI. These reviews deal with the current status of the emerging technique of 4D Flow MRI facilitated in various areas that are difficult to obtain with conventional flowmetry. MR signals inherently contain flow velocity information. In previous decades, in vivo blood flow measurement was traditionally performed by 2D methods, such as Doppler ultrasonography and 2D phase-contrast MRI, which have long been regarded as mature techniques in hemodynamic flowmetry. Although 2D velocimetries have many advantages over 4D Flow MRI in terms of cost and accessibility, and provide excellent temporal and in-plane spatial resolutions, they also have some disadvantages. The emerging technology of 4D Flow MRI can overcome the shortcomings of conventional 2D imaging. In recent years, hemodynamic analysis has witnessed significant progress that is primarily attributable to advances in 4D Flow MRI.