Quality Control for 4D Flow MR Imaging

Direct comparison of whole heart quantifications between different retrospective and prospective gated 4D flow CMR acquisitions

Introduction

4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a versatile technique to non-invasively assess cardiovascular hemodynamics. With developing technology, choice in sequences and acquisition parameters is expanding and it is important to assess if data acquired with these different variants can be directly compared, especially when combining datasets within research studies. For example, sequences may allow a choice in gating techniques or be limited to one method, yet there is not a direct comparison investigating how gating selection impacts quantifications of the great vessels, semilunar and atrioventricular valves and ventricles. Thus, this study investigated if quantifications across the heart from contemporary 4D flow sequences are comparable between two commonly used 4D flow sequences reliant on different ECG gating techniques.

Methods

Forty participants (33 healthy controls, seven patients with coronary artery disease and abnormal diastolic function) were prospectively recruited into a single-centre observational study to undergo a 3T-CMR exam. Two acquisitions, a k-t GRAPPA 4D flow with prospective gating (4Dprosp) and a modern compressed sensing 4D flow with retrospective gating (4Dretro), were acquired in each participant. Images were analyzed for volumes, flow rates and velocities in the vessels and four valves, and for biventricular kinetic energy and flow components. Data was compared for group differences with paired t-tests and for agreement with Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation (ICC).

Results

Measurements primarily occurring during systole of the great vessels, semilunar valves and both left and right ventricles did not differ between acquisition types (p > 0.05 from t-test) and yielded good to excellent agreement (ICC: 0.75-0.99). Similar findings were observed for the majority of parameters dependent on early diastole. However, measurements occurring in late diastole or those reliant on the entire-cardiac cycle such as flow component volumes along with diastolic kinetic energy values were not similar between 4Dprosp and 4Dretro acquisitions resulting in poor agreement (ICC < 0.50).

Discussion

Direct comparison of measurements between two different 4D flow acquisitions reliant on different gating methods demonstrated systolic and early diastolic markers across the heart should be compatible when comparing these two 4D flow sequences. On the other hand, late diastolic and intraventricular parameters should be compared with caution.

Unveiling cellular and molecular aspects of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections

Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) remains a significant medical concern, with its asymptomatic nature posing diagnostic and monitoring challenges, thereby increasing the risk of aortic wall dissection and rupture. Current management of aortic repair relies on an aortic diameter threshold. However, this approach underestimates the complexity of aortic wall disease due to important knowledge gaps in understanding its underlying pathologic mechanisms.Since traditional risk factors cannot explain the initiation and progression of ATAA leading to dissection, local vascular factors such as extracellular matrix (ECM) and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) might harbor targets for early diagnosis and intervention. Derived from diverse embryonic lineages, VSMCs exhibit varied responses to genetic abnormalities that regulate their contractility. The transition of VSMCs into different phenotypes is an adaptive response to stress stimuli such as hemodynamic changes resulting from cardiovascular disease, aging, lifestyle, and genetic predisposition. Upon longer exposure to stress stimuli, VSMC phenotypic switching can instigate pathologic remodeling that contributes to the pathogenesis of ATAA.This review aims to illuminate the current understanding of cellular and molecular characteristics associated with ATAA and dissection, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced comprehension of the impaired ECM-VSMC network.

Robust and fast stochastic 4D flow vector-field signature technique for quantifying composite flow dynamics from 4D flow MRI: Application to left atrial flow in atrial fibrillation

4D flow MRI is an emerging imaging modality that maps voxel-wise blood flow information as velocity vector fields that is acquired in 7-dimensional image volumes (3 spatial dimensions + 3 velocity directions + time). Blood flow in the cardiovascular system is often complex and composite involving multiple flow dynamics and patterns (e.g., vortex flow, jets, stagnating flow) that occur and interact simultaneously. The spectrum of such complex flow dynamics is embedded in the velocity vector field dynamics derived from 4D Flow MRI. However, current flow metrics cannot fully measure high-dimensional vector-field data and embedded complex composite flow data. Instead, these methods need to break down the vector-field data into secondary scalar fields of individual flow components using fluid dynamics operators. These methods are gradient-based and sensitive to data uncertainties, and only focus on individual flow components of the overall composite flow, therefore potentially underestimating the severity of overall flow changes associated with cardiovascular diseases. To address these limitations, in MICCAI 2021, we introduced a novel comprehensive stochastic 4D Flow vector-field signature technique that works directly on the entire spatiotemporal velocity vector field. This technique uses efficient stochastic gradient-free interrogation of multi-million flow vector-pairs per patient to derive the patient's unique flow profile of the complex composite flow alterations and in real-time processing. The signature technique's probabilistic gradient-free formulation should allow for highly robust quantification despite inherent errors in 4D flow MRI acquisitions. Here, we extend the application of the 4D flow vector-field signature technique to the left atrium to analyze complex composite flow changes in patients with atrial fibrillation. In 128 subjects, we performed extensive sensitivity testing and determined that the vector-field signature technique is highly robust to typical sources of data uncertainties in 4D flow MRI: degradation in spatiotemporal resolution, added Gaussian noise, and segmentation errors. We demonstrate the excellent generalizability of the stochastic convergence from the aorta to the left atrium and between different 4D Flow MRI acquisition protocols. We compare the robustness of our technique to existing advanced flow quantification metrics of kinetic energy, vorticity, and energy loss demonstrating a superior performance of up-to 14-fold. Our results show the potential diagnostic and clinical utility of our signature technique in identifying distinctly altered composite flow signatures in atrial fibrillation patients independent of existing flow metrics.

4D Flow MRI in the portal venous system: imaging and analysis methods, and clinical applications

Thus far, ultrasound, CT, and 2D cine phase-contrast MRI has been adopted to evaluate blood flow and vascular morphology in the portal venous system; however, all these techniques have some shortcomings, such as limited field of view and difficulty in accurately evaluating blood flow. A new imaging technique, namely 3D cine phase-contrast (4D Flow) MRI, can acquire blood flow data of the entire abdomen at once and in a time-resolved manner, allowing visual, quantitative, and comprehensive assessment of blood flow in the portal venous system. In addition, a retrospective blood flow analysis, i.e., "retrospective flowmetry," is possible. Although the development of 4D Flow MRI for the portal system has been delayed compared to that for the arterial system owing to the lower flow velocity of the portal venous system and the presence of respiratory artifacts, several useful reports have recently been published as the technology has advanced. In the first part of this narrative review article, technical considerations of image acquisition and analysis methods of 4D Flow MRI for the portal venous system and the validations of their results are described. In the second part, the current clinical application of 4D Flow MRI for the portal venous system is reviewed.

Why 4D Flow MRI? Real Advantages

This special issue of Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences features the most recent reviews on 4D Flow MRI. These reviews deal with the current status of the emerging technique of 4D Flow MRI facilitated in various areas that are difficult to obtain with conventional flowmetry. MR signals inherently contain flow velocity information. In previous decades, in vivo blood flow measurement was traditionally performed by 2D methods, such as Doppler ultrasonography and 2D phase-contrast MRI, which have long been regarded as mature techniques in hemodynamic flowmetry. Although 2D velocimetries have many advantages over 4D Flow MRI in terms of cost and accessibility, and provide excellent temporal and in-plane spatial resolutions, they also have some disadvantages. The emerging technology of 4D Flow MRI can overcome the shortcomings of conventional 2D imaging. In recent years, hemodynamic analysis has witnessed significant progress that is primarily attributable to advances in 4D Flow MRI.