Improved Visualization of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma with Computed Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Image Quality between Topup-Corrected and Standard Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics

This study compares the diagnostic performance and image quality of single-shot turbo spin-echo DWI (tseDWI), standard readout-segmented DWI (rsDWI), and a modified rsDWI version (topupDWI) for cholesteatoma diagnostics. Thirty-four patients with newly suspected unilateral cholesteatoma were examined on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating and comparing the sensitivity and specificity using histopathological results as the standard of reference. Image quality was independently reviewed by two readers using a 5-point Likert scale evaluating image distortions, susceptibility artifacts, image resolution, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence. Twenty-five cholesteatomas were histologically confirmed after surgery and originated in the study group. TseDWI showed the highest sensitivity with 96% (95% confidence interval (CI): 88–100%), followed by topupDWI with 92% (95% CI: 81–100%) for both readers. The sensitivity for rsDWI was 76% (95% CI: 59–93%) for reader 1 and 84% (95% CI: 70–98%) for reader 2, respectively. Both tseDWI and topupDWI revealed a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66–100%) and rsDWI of 89% (95% CI: 52–100%). Both tseDWI and topupDWI showed fewer image distortions and susceptibility artifacts compared to rsDWI. Image resolution was consistently rated best for topupDWI, followed by rsDWI, which both outperformed tseDWI. TopupDWI and tseDWI showed comparable results for lesions’ conspicuity and diagnostic confidence, both outperforming rsDWI. Modified readout-segmented DWI using the topup-correction method is preferable to standard rsDWI and may be regarded as an accurate alternative to single-shot turbo spin-echo DWI in cholesteatoma diagnostics.

Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The high diagnostic value of DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics is undisputed. This study compares the diagnostic value of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with newly suspected cholesteatoma were examined with a dedicated protocol, including readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI at 1.5T. Acquisition parameters of both diffusion-weighted sequences were as follows: b=1000 s/mm,² axial and coronal section orientations, and section thickness of 3 mm. Image quality was evaluated by 2 readers on a 5-point Likert scale with respect to lesion conspicuity, the presence of susceptibility artifacts mimicking cholesteatomas, and overall subjective image quality. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using histology results as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases of histologically confirmed cholesteatomas were included in the study group. Lesion conspicuity was higher and fewer artifacts were found when using TSE DWI (both P < .001). The overall subjective image quality, however, was better with readout-segmented DWI. For TSE DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 92% (95% CI, 74%-99%) and 88% (95% CI, 69%-97%), respectively, while the specificity for both readers was 80% (95% CI, 28%-99%). For readout-segmented DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%) and 68% (95% CI, 46%-85%), while the specificity for both readers was 60% (95% CI, 15%-95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of TSE DWI is advisable for cholesteatoma diagnostics and preferable over readout-segmented DWI.

Optimal target b-value on computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for visualization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and focal autoimmune pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To compare computed diffusion-weighted imaging (cDWI) feasibility with that of directly acquired DWI for visualizing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and focal autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS

From April 2012 to January 2017, 135 patients with PDAC (n = 111) or focal AIP (n = 24) were retrospectively enrolled. They underwent DWI with b-values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm². From DWI₀ and DWI₁₀₀₀, we generated cDWIs with targeted b-values of 1500, 2000, and 3000 s/mm². The lesions' signal intensities, image quality, signal intensity ratio (SIR) of lesions and pancreatic parenchyma to spinal cord, and lesion-to-pancreatic parenchyma contrast ratio (CR) were compared among the five DWI protocols (DWI₅₀₀, DWI₁₀₀₀, cDWI₁₅₀₀, cDWI₂₀₀₀, and cDWI₃₀₀₀). SIR was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

DWI₅₀₀, DWI₁₀₀₀, and cDWI₁₅₀₀ had higher image quality than cDWI₂₀₀₀ and cDWI₃₀₀₀ (P < 0.001). The incidence of clear hyperintense PDAC was highest on cDWI₂₀₀₀, followed by cDWI₁₅₀₀, and cDWI₃₀₀₀ (P < 0.001-0.002), while the incidence of clear hyperintense AIP was higher on DWI₁₀₀₀, cDWI₁₅₀₀, and cDWI₂₀₀₀ than on DWI₅₀₀ and cDWI₃₀₀₀ (P = 0.001-0.022). SIRs decreased whereas CRs increased as the b-value increased, for both PDAC and AIP. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of SIR_lesion was significantly lower on cDWI₁₅₀₀ than on cDWI₂₀₀₀ and cDWI₃₀₀₀ (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

cDWI₁₅₀₀ or cDWI₂₀₀₀ generated from b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² were the most effective for visualizing PDAC and focal AIP; however, the SIR_lesion AUC was significantly lower on cDWI₁₅₀₀ than on cDWI₂₀₀₀ and cDWI₃₀₀₀.