A proprioceptive ability factor underlying all proprioception tests? Response to Tremblay (2013)

The effect of age and proprioceptive illusion susceptibility on gait

OBJECTIVE

Age-related gait decline has been associated with impaired proprioception, one's internal awareness of spatial location and movement. Although impaired proprioception has further been linked to greater susceptibility to proprioceptive illusions, it is unclear the impact such susceptibility has on gait and its interaction with age. The purpose of this study was to address these uncertainties.

METHODS

We measured proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle spindle manipulation and gait in young and older adults. We also compared illusory measures with traditionally used joint position matching to examine if illusory susceptibility can reveal proprioceptive impairments.

RESULTS

We found no effect of age on proprioceptive illusion susceptibility or joint position matching error. Compared to non-perceivers, illusion perceivers across both age groups showed greater joint matching error, suggesting reduced proprioceptive acuity. Consistent with previous studies, older adults had reduced cadence, gait velocity, and step length compared to young adults in both single- and dual-task walking. Interestingly, illusion perceivers, regardless of age, showed reduced cadence and step width compared to non-perceivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that gait impairments observed in those who perceive these proprioceptive illusions are age-independent, potentially rooted in deteriorated proprioception.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first study to examine these relations.

Do individuals with ankle instability show altered lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during walking? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine if individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) demonstrate altered lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during walking.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant studies were sourced from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO and PEDro.

STUDY SELECTION

Kinematic and kinetic studies involving joint angle and/or joint moment measured in individuals with CAI were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess literature quality. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) in joint angles and moments between CAI and controls were analyzed as continuous variables.

RESULTS

1261 articles were screened, with a final selection of 13 studies involving 729 participants. Compared to non-CAI controls, CAI participants showed significantly greater ankle inversion angle (degree) (WMD: 3.71, 95% CI: 3.15 to 4.27, p < 0.001), hip adduction angle (degree) (WMD: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.09 to 3.11, p = 0.04), and knee valgus moment (N m/kg) (WMD: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.13, p = 0.02) during walking. Additionally, there were no consistent findings or specific altered patterns in other lower extremity joint angles, or moment changes, regardless of the motion plane (sagittal, coronal, horizontal), for CAI compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides further evidence of altered lower limb kinematics and kinetics in the frontal plane in CAI participants during certain walking phases, which may partially explain the high level of recurrent ankle sprains observed in the CAI population, and support hip abduction and ankle eversion motor control exercises for CAI rehabilitation.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42023420418. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Effects of sensorimotor training on functional and pain outcomes in achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review

Background

Considering the neuromuscular alterations in Achilles tendinopathy (AT), sensorimotor training (SMT) might be beneficial to restore the neuromuscular capacity of the muscle-tendon complex and thereby improve patients' functions and alleviate symptoms. However, there is still a lack of knowledge concerning the effects of SMT on improving functional (e.g., strength) and pain outcomes in this population. Thus, the purpose of this study was to synthesize current evidence to analyze the efficacy of SMT in people with AT.

Methods

A systematic electronic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2023. Studies applying SMT in people with AT investigating functional or clinical pain outcomes were considered. Protocols had to incorporate balance, stabilization, proprioception, or vibration training. Patients with insertional or mid-portion AT (≥18 years age) diagnosed with clinical or sonographic evaluation were included.

Results

The search yielded 823 records. A total of three randomized controlled trials were considered eligible for the analysis. Each trial used a different SMT protocol: balance training, balance with stabilization training, or whole-body vibration training (WBVT) with other co-interventions. Most functional and pain parameters improved compared to baseline. The first study reported a decrease in pain and an increase in performance (i.e., countermovement jump height) and endurance (i.e., number of heel-raises) by 12-week use of a balance training in addition to isometric, concentric/eccentric, and eccentric exercises. The second study evaluated the four weeks effect of SMT (balance and stabilization training plus eccentric exercises) in addition to passive physiotherapy (deep frictions, ice, ultrasound), resulting in an increased plantarflexion peak torque and reduced pain levels. The third study investigating WBVT reported at 12 weeks an increase in flexibility and a decrease in tendon pain.

Discussion

SMT in addition to other co-interventions (i.e., eccentric, isometric, concentric/eccentric training, physiotherapy) showed improvements in strength, performance, muscle flexibility, and alleviated clinical outcomes of pain. SMT might therefore be useful as part of a multimodal treatment strategy protocol in patients suffering from AT. However, due to the small number of studies included and the diversity of SMT protocols, the current evidence is weak; its additional effectiveness should be evaluated.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=467698, Identifier CRD42023467698.

Toward Development of a Novel Proprioceptive Trail-Making Test: Comparing Healthy Dancers and Non-Dancers

There is a pressing need for ecologically valid versions of traditional neuropsychological tests indexing executive function (EF), such as the Trail-Making Task (TMT), that incorporate movement and bodily awareness in healthy participants with varying abilities. We designed a proprioceptive version of the TMT (pTMT) that involved coordinated gross motor movement and proprioceptive awareness to investigate whether this measure of visual attention, task switching, and working memory positively correlated with a computerized version of the TMT (the dTMT). We aimed to establish the initial validity of our proprioceptive TMT (pTMT) by comparing performances on the dTMT and pTMT among a cohort of 36 healthy participants (18 dancers, 18 non-dancers; M age = 22, SD = 5.27; 64% female) anticipating that dancers would express higher intrinsic bodily awareness than non-dancers. Results revealed a mild to moderate but statistically significant positive correlation between dTMT and pTMT completion times [part A: r (36) = .33, p = .04; part B: r (36) = .37, p = .03] and numbers of errors [part B: r (36) = .41, p = .01] across both participant groups. These data suggest partial measurement convergence between these two TMT versions. Relative to non-dancers, dancers exhibited a higher level of performance (likely due to their better proprioceptive ability) through their faster completion times on dTMT-B [t (34) = 3.81, p = .006, d = 1.27] and pTMT-B [t (34) = 2.97, p = .005, d = .99], and their fewer errors on dTMT-B [t (34) = 2.93, p = .006, d = 1.0]. By identifying cognitive differences between these different groups of healthy individuals, our data contribute to both a theoretical understanding and the initial development of gross motor movement-based cognitive assessments, providing a path toward the further refinement of an ecologically valid full-body TMT.

Can therapeutic exercises improve proprioception in chronic ankle instability? a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess exercise therapies that aim to enhance proprioception in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).

DATA SOURCES

Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EBSCO) were searched in October 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials involving exercise therapy conducted on individuals with CAI were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a standardized form. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with the PEDro scale.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The end-trial weighted mean difference and standard deviations were analyzed, and the synthetic value for the improvement in error scores of ankle joint position sense (JPS) in multiple directions was evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven trials with 333 participants were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and were included in the Network Meta-Analysis. Foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercise showed the highest probability of being among the best treatments (surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA)=74.6%). The next two were static balance exercise only (SUCRA=67.9%) and corrective exercise (SUCRA=56.1%). The SUCRA values of proprioceptive exercise, dynamic balance exercise only, aquatic exercise, rehabilitation exercise with brace, mixed static/dynamic balance exercise, and control were at relatively low levels, and scored at 49.6%, 48.8%, 47.8%, 47.7%, 44.0%, and 13.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercise may have a good effect when used to improve JPS in individuals with CAI. Probably, the more complex balance exercise intervention becomes, the less effective the proprioceptive outcome.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021240331.

Effects of core stabilization exercise and strengthening exercise on proprioception, balance, muscle thickness and pain related outcomes in patients with subacute nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Therapeutic exercises are used in clinical practice for patients with low back pain (LBP). Core stabilization exercises can retrain the important function of local trunk muscles and increase the accuracy of the sensory integration process for stability of the spine in individuals with LBP. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different exercise regimes, Core stabilization exercises (CSE) and Strengthening exercise (STE), on proprioception, balance, muscle thickness and pain-related outcomes in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).

Methods

Thirty-six subacute NSLBP patients, [mean age, 34.78 ± 9.07 years; BMI, 24.03 ± 3.20 Kg/m²; and duration of current pain, 8.22 ± 1.61 weeks], were included in this study. They were randomly allocated into either CSE (n = 18) or STE groups (n = 18). Exercise training was given for 30 min, three times per week, for up to 4 weeks. Proprioception, standing balance, muscle thickness of transversus abdominis (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM), and pain-related outcomes, comprising pain, functional disability and fear of movement, were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention.

Results

The CSE group demonstrated significantly more improvement than the STE group after 4 weeks of intervention. Improvements were in: proprioception [mean difference (95% CI): − 0.295 (− 0.37 to − 0.2), effect size: 1.38, (p <  0.001)], balance: single leg standing with eyes open and eyes closed on both stable and unstable surfaces (p <  0.05), and percentage change of muscle thickness of TrA and LM (p <  0.01). Although both exercise groups gained relief from pain, the CSE group demonstrated greater reduction of functional disability [effect size: 0.61, (p <  0.05)] and fear of movement [effect size: 0.80, (p < 0.01)]. There were no significant adverse effects in either type of exercise program.

Conclusion

Despite both core stabilization and strengthening exercises reducing pain, core stabilization exercise is superior to strengthening exercise. It is effective in improving proprioception, balance, and percentage change of muscle thickness of TrA and LM, and reducing functional disability and fear of movement in patients with subacute NSLBP.

Trial registration

Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR20180822001; August 21, 2018).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04858-6.

Assessing proprioception: A critical review of methods

To control movement, the brain has to integrate proprioceptive information from a variety of mechanoreceptors. The role of proprioception in daily activities, exercise, and sports has been extensively investigated, using different techniques, yet the proprioceptive mechanisms underlying human movement control are still unclear. In the current work we have reviewed understanding of proprioception and the three testing methods: threshold to detection of passive motion, joint position reproduction, and active movement extent discrimination, all of which have been used for assessing proprioception. The origin of the methods, the different testing apparatus, and the procedures and protocols used in each approach are compared and discussed. Recommendations are made for choosing an appropriate technique when assessing proprioceptive mechanisms in different contexts.

The Role of Ankle Proprioception for Balance Control in relation to Sports Performance and Injury

Balance control improvement is one of the most important goals in sports and exercise. Better balance is strongly positively associated with enhanced athletic performance and negatively associated with lower limb sports injuries. Proprioception plays an essential role in balance control, and ankle proprioception is arguably the most important. This paper reviews ankle proprioception and explores synergies with balance control, specifically in a sporting context. Central processing of ankle proprioceptive information, along with other sensory information, enables integration for balance control. When assessing ankle proprioception, the most generalizable findings arise from methods that are ecologically valid, allow proprioceptive signals to be integrated with general vision in the central nervous system, and reflect the signal-in-noise nature of central processing. Ankle proprioceptive intervention concepts driven by such a central processing theory are further proposed and discussed for the improvement of balance control in sport.