|
1
|
Malloy TE, Mitchell C, Gordon OE. Training Cognitive Strategies Underlying Intelligent Problem Solving. Percept Mot Skills 2016. [DOI: 10.2466/pms.1987.64.3c.1039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive strategies underlying excellent performance of intelligent people on the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test were used to develop a teaching package. 24 subjects in a Cognitive Strategies group were trained using this teaching package. An Exposure group of 17 subjects were not trained but solved all the examples of puzzles in the package. A Control group, with 13 subjects, received no intervention. Subjects were pre- and posttested on matrix solving ability and were posttested on a Piagetian multiplicative classification task. The Cognitive Strategies group showed the greatest improvement pre- to posttest, followed by the Exposure group and then the Control group. The Cognitive Strategies group was superior to both controls on the Piagetian task, indicating a broad improvement in cognitive functioning.
Collapse
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
Green KE, Kluever RC. Components of Item Difficulty of Raven's Matrices. The Journal of General Psychology 1992. [DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1992.9921172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
|
4
|
|