Right hemispheric contribution to motor programming of simultaneous bilateral response

Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements

The goal of this study was to determine the process or processes most likely to be involved in reaction-time costs for spatially cued bimanual reaching. We used reaction time to measure the cost of bimanual symmetric movements compared to unimanual movements (a bimanual symmetric cost) and the cost for bimanual asymmetric movements compared to symmetric movements (a bimanual asymmetric cost). The results showed that reaction times were comparable for all types of movements in simple reaction time; that is, there was neither a bimanual symmetric cost nor an asymmetric cost. Therefore, unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements have comparable complexity during response initiation. In choice conditions, there was no bimanual symmetric cost but there was a bimanual asymmetric cost, indicating that the preparation of asymmetric movements is more complex than symmetric movements. This asymmetric cost is likely the result of interference during response programming.

Comparison of bilateral force deficit in proximal and distal joints in upper extremities

Bilateral force deficit refers to the phenomenon that maximal generated force during simultaneous bilateral muscle contractions is lower than the sum of forces generated unilaterally. Based on the notion that neural inhibition is the main source for bilateral force deficit and existing differences in neural inhibiting interhemispheric organization of proximal and distal muscles, we expected differences in bilateral deficit in proximal and distal joints. The aim of the current behavioral experiment was to compare bilateral force deficit in proximal compared to distal upper extremity joints. Ten young adults performed single-joint maximal voluntary contractions in isometric flexions of the shoulder and index finger unilaterally and bilaterally. The results showed a significant absolute bilateral force deficit for both proximal (140.01 ± 86.99 N) and distal muscles (4.64 ± 4.86 N). More importantly, relative bilateral force deficit for shoulder flexion was significantly larger than for index finger flexion, -20.51 ± 7.8% and -5.07 ± 3.84% respectively. The hypothesis of a more pronounced bilateral force deficit for proximal compared to distal muscles was confirmed in our results. Thus, our findings, in combination with the neuroanatomical differences for proximal and distal muscles, make it worthwhile to further explore the hypothesis that the commissural fibers provide differences in interhemispheric inhibitory interactions during bimanual actions for proximal and distal muscles.

Hemispheric Competition in Left-Handers on Bimanual Reaction Time Tasks

The authors examined possible differences in left- and right-handers on bimanual reaction times to centralized visual stimuli. Eighty participants (n = 40 in each group of left- and right-handers) were tested on unimanual and bimanual reaction time (RT) tasks. Consistently across the 2 groups, the dominant-hand RT was faster, on average, than the nondominant-hand RT, and unimanual RTs were faster than bimanual RTs. However, RT differences between hands revealed a higher percentage of dominant-hand-led trials in right-handers than in left-handers, despite similar absolute RT differences in the 2 groups. On the basis of those findings, the authors conclude that hand dominance does not generally determine which hand leads in a bimanual task and that left-handers have stronger between-hemisphere competition than right-handers do.